1,527
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Being hybrid: a conceptual update of consumer self and consumption due to online/offline hybridity

Pages 40-74 | Received 31 Jan 2018, Accepted 17 Oct 2018, Published online: 18 Feb 2019

References

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge, UK: PolityPress.
  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society, 7(2–3), 295–310.
  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ares, G., & Varela, P. (Eds.). (2018). Methods in consumer research, volume 2. Alternative approaches and special applications. Cambridge, MA: Woodhead Publishing.
  • Askegaard, S., & Linnet, J. (2011). Towards an epistemology of consumer culture theory: Phenomenology and the context of context. Marketing Theory, 11(4), 381–404.
  • Babic Rosario, A. (2017). Moral legitimation of hybrid consumption practices: A study of gluten-free lifestyles. In A. Gneezy, V. Griskevicius, & P. Williams (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, (Vol. 45, p. 1013). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
  • Bailey, L. W. (2005). The enchantments of technology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1986). The problem of the text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences: An experiment in philosophical analysis. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 103–131). Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2017). Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582–597.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1990). Fatal strategies. Paris: Semiotext(e).
  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Bauman, Z. (2015). The making and unmaking of strangers. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (2nd revised ed., pp. 46–57). London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
  • Belk, R. W. (2003). The sims and the retro future. In S. Brown & J. Sherry (Eds.), Time, space, and the market: Retroscapes rising (pp. 35–53). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Belk, R. W. (2007). Why not share rather than own? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126–140.
  • Belk, R. W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734.
  • Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.
  • Belk, R. W. (2016). Understanding the robot: Comments on Goudey and Bonnin (2016). Recherche Et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 31(4), 83–90.
  • Belk, R. W. (2017). Consumers in an age of autonomous and semiautonomous machines. In E. M. Fischer & J. F. Sherry (Eds.), Contemporary consumer culture theory (pp. 5–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bennett, D. (1994). Hollywood’s indeterminacy machine. Arena, 3, 30.
  • Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Bhabha, H. K. (2015). Foreword. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (2nd revised ed., pp. IX–XIII). London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x
  • Bode, M., & Kristensen, D. (2016). The digital Doppelgänger within: A Study on self-tracking and the quantified self movement. In R. Canniford & D. Bajde (Eds.), Assembling consumption: Researching actors, networks and markets (pp. 119–134). London: Routledge.
  • Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Branaman, A. (2010). The protean Goffman: Erving Goffman and the new individualism. In M. H. Jacobsen (Ed.), Contemporary Goffman (pp. 232–256). London: Routledge.
  • Bruner, E. (2004). Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Cruz, A. (2011). Discourses of technology consumption: Ambivalence, fear, and liminality. Advances in Consumer Research, 39, 287–291.
  • Campbell, N. (2012). Posthuman consumer. In R. W. Belk & R. Llamas (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital consumption (pp. 39–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Canclini, N. G. (1995). Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Casey, E. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L., & Sey, A. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chatzidakis, A., Maclaran, P., & Bradshaw, A. (2012). Heterotopian space and the utopics of ethical and green consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3/4), 494–515.
  • Cole-Turner, R. (Ed.). (2011). Transhumanism and transcendence: Christian hope in an age of technical enchantment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Coskuner-Balli, G., & Ertimur, B. (2017). Legitimation of hybrid cultural products: The case of American Yoga. Marketing Theory, 17(2), 127–147.
  • Cross, S. N. N., Ruvalcaba, C., Venkatesh, A., & Belk, R. W. (Eds.). (2018). Consumer culture theory. Research in consumer behavior (Vol. 19). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Cruz, E. G., & Meyer, E. T. (2012). Creation and control in the photographic process: IPhones and the emerging fifth moment of photography. Photographies, 5(2), 203–221.
  • Davis, E. (1998). Techgnosis: Myth, magic and mysticism in the age of information. New York, NY: Harmony Books.
  • De Souza E Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid. Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278.
  • De Souza E Silva, A., & Sheller, M. (Eds.). (2014). Mobility and locative media. Mobile communication in hybrid spaces. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1972). L’Anti-Oedipe. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
  • Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Diamantaki, K. (2014). The ambiguous construction of place and space. In U. Gehman & M. Reiche (Eds.), Real virtuality: About the destruction and multiplication of world (pp. 245–268). Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Dilley, R. (1999). Introduction: The problem of context. In R. Dilley (Ed.), The problem of context (pp. 3–46). Oxford: Berghahn.
  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Ensslin, A., & Muse, E. (Eds.). (2011). Creating second lives: Community, identity and spatiality as constructions of the virtual. London: Routledge.
  • Erikson, K. (2005). On the ontology of networks. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2(4), 305–323.
  • Etkin, J. (2016). The hidden cost of personal quantification. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 967–984.
  • Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer culture and postmodernism. London: Sage.
  • Firat, A. F., & Shultz, C. (1997). From segmentation to fragmentation: Markets and marketing in the postmodern era. European Journal of Marketing, 31(3/4), 183–207.
  • Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory post-modernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.
  • Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. London: Routledge.
  • Fizek, S., & Wasilewska, M. (2011). Embodiment and gender identity in virtual worlds: Reconfiguring our “volatile bodies”. In A. Ensslin & E. Muse (Eds.), Creating second lives. Community, identity and spatiality as constructions of the virtual (pp. 75–98). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Friedman, J. (2015). Global crises, the struggle for cultural identity and intellectual porkbarrelling: Cosmopolitans versus locals, ethnics and nationals in an era of de-hegemonisation. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (2nd revised ed., pp. 70–89). London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Frith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7(1), 131–149.
  • Gehman, U. (2014). The frame context. In U. Gehman & M. Reiche (Eds.), Real virtuality: About the destruction and multiplication of world (pp. 21–46). Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). I’d like to buy the world a coke: Consumptionscapes of the “less affluent world”. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 271–304.
  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 43–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
  • Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
  • Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work. An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.
  • Gordon, E., & de Souza E Silva, M. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Gottschalk, S. (2010). The presentation of avatars in second life: Self and interaction in social virtual spaces. Symbolic Interaction, 33(4), 501–525.
  • Goudey, A., & Bonnin, G. (2016). Must smart objects look human? Study of the impact of anthropomorphism on the acceptance of companion robots. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing, 31(2), 2–20.
  • Goulding, C., Shankar, A., & Elliott, R. (2002). Working weeks, rave weekends: Identity fragmentation and the emergence of new communities. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 5(4), 261–284.
  • Graham, S. (2011). Cities under siege: The new military urbanism. London: Verso.
  • Hackley, C., & Hackley, R. A. (2017, July). The hybridisation of advertising under convergence – from text to paratext [Conference paper]. CCT Conference, 9–12, Anaheim, California: University of California-Irvine. https://merage.uci.edu/_files/documents/events/2017/CCT2017-FullConferenceProgram.pdf.
  • Hannerz, U. (1992). Cultural complexity: Studies in the social organization of meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Hansen, M. (2006). Bodies in code: Interfaces with digital media. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hao, J. (2018). Live streaming, the new sales engine for e-commerce in China [online] Medium.com. https://medium.com/@jinghanhao/live-broadcasting-the-new-sales-engine-for-e-commerce-in-china-part-1-2-64b1fe1b960a
  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women. London: Free Association Books.
  • Harmann, B. J., & Ostberg, J. (2013). Authenticating by re-enchantment: The discursive making of craft production. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(7–8), 882–911.
  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Haskel, J., & Westlake, S. (2017). Capitalism without capital: The rise of the intangible economy. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
  • Hazan, H. (2015). Against hybridity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Heidegger, M. (1967). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. London: Garland Publishing.
  • Huizinga, J. (1968). Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Ishii, H. (1999). Tangible bits: Coupling physicality and virtuality through tangible user interfaces. In Y. Ohta & H. Tamura (Eds.), Mixed reality: Merging real and virtual worlds (1st ed., pp. 229–246). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Jacobsen, M. H. (Ed.). (2010). Contemporary Goffman. London: Routledge.
  • Jenkins, R. (2000). Disenchantment, enchantment and re-enchantment: Max Weber at the millennium. Max Weber Studies, 1, 11–32.
  • Jenkins, R. (2010). The 21st-Century interaction order. In M. H. Jacobsen (Ed.), Contemporary Goffman (pp. 257–274). London: Routledge.
  • Jensen, O. B. (2006). Facework, flow and the city: Simmel, Goffman, and mobility in the contemporary city. Mobilities, 1(2), 143–165.
  • Jensen, O. B. (2009). Flows of meaning, cultures of movements – Urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities, 4(1), 139–158.
  • Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53–78.
  • Josephson-Storm, J. A. (2017). The myth of disenchantment. Magic, modernity, and the birth of the human sciences. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kärrholm, M. (2012). Retailising space architecture. Retail and the territorialisation of public space. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Katz, J. (2007). Mobile media and communication: Some important questions. Communication Monograph, 74(3), 389–394.
  • Kluitenberg, D. (2006). The network of waves. Living and acting in a hybrid space. Open! [online]. http://www.onlineopen.org/the-network-of-waves
  • Kohn, M. (2003). Radical spaces: Building the house of the people. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Kozinets, R. V., & Kedzior, R. (2009). I, Avatar: Autonetnographic research in virtual worlds. In N. T. Wood & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Virtual social identity and consumer behavior (1st ed., pp. 3–19). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Leppänen, H., & Grönroos, C. (2009). The hybrid consumer: Exploring the drivers of a new consumer behaviour type [online]. Hanken School of Economics Working Papers no. 543. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10227/465/543-978-952-232-069-8.pdf?sequence=3
  • Lévy, P. (2001). Cyberculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ling, R. (2010a). Texting as a life phase phenomenon. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 2797.
  • Ling, R. (2010b). The “unboothed” phone: Goffman and use of mobile communication. In M. H. Jacobsen (Ed.), Contemporary Goffman (pp. 275–292). London: Routledge.
  • Luke, C., & Luke, A. (1999). Theorizing interracial families and hybrid identity: An Australian perspective. Educational Theory, 49(2), 223–249.
  • MacKenzie, D. A. (2007). Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets. In D. A. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (1st ed., pp. 54–86). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Mardon, R., & Belk, R. W. (2018). Materializing digital collecting: An extended view of digital materiality. Marketing Theory, 1–28. doi:10.1177/1470593118767725
  • Masso, I. C. (2011). The grips of fantasy: The construction of female characters in and beyond virtual game worlds. In A. Ensslin & E. Muse (Eds.), Creating second lives. Community, identity and spatiality as constructions of the virtual (pp. 113–144). London: Routledge.
  • Matei, S. A. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Virtual community discourse and the dilemma of modernity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 3.
  • McEwen, I. K. (1993). Socrate's ancestor: An essay on architectural beginnings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Middaugh, E., Bowyer, B., & Kahne, J. (2017). U Suk! Participatory media and youth experiences with political discourse. Youth & Society, 49(7), 902–922.
  • More, M., & Vita-More, N. (2013). The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Morley, D., & Kuan-Hsing, C. (Eds.). (1996). Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London: Routledge.
  • Newell, S. (2013). Brands as masks: Public secrecy and the counterfeit in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(1), 138–154.
  • Numerato, D. (2009). Revisiting Weber’s concept of disenchantment: An examination of the re-enchantment with wailing in the post-communist Czech Republic. Sociology, 43(3), 439–456.
  • Oksman, V., & Rautiainen, P. (2003). ‘Perhaps it is a body part’: How the mobile phone became an organic part of everyday lives of Finnish chidren and teenagers. In J. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become Us (pp. 263–308). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place. New York: Marlowe.
  • Oswald, L. R. (1999). Culture swapping: Consumption and ethnogenesis of middle-class Haitian immigrants. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 303–318.
  • Papastergiadis, N. (2015). Tracing hybridity in theory. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (2nd revised ed., pp. 257–281). London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Presi, C., Maehle, N., & Kleppe, I. A. (2016). Brand selfies: Consumer experiences and marketplace conversations. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1814–1834.
  • Rainsch, R., & Sorgner, S. L. (Eds.). (2014). Post- and transhumanism: An introduction (Beyond humanism: Trans- and posthumanism/Jenseits des Humanismus: Trans- und Posthumanismus). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.
  • Rettie, R. (2009). Mobile phone communication: Extending Goffman to mediated interaction. Sociology, 43(3), 421–438.
  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York, NY: Perseus Books.
  • Ritzer, G. (2005). Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Roden, D. (2014). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. London: Routledge.
  • Rokka, J. (2010). Netnographic inquiry and new translocal sites of the social. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 381–387.
  • Rokka, J., & Canniford, R. (2016). Heterotopian selfies: How social media destabilizes brand assemblages. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9–10), 1789–1813.
  • Rushdie, S. (1988). The satanic verses. London: Viking.
  • Rutsky, R. L. (1999). High techné: Art and technology from the machine aesthetic to the posthuman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 152–171.
  • Schau, H., & Gilly, M. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385–404.
  • Schumpeter, A. (1934). The theory of economic development. London: Transaction Publishers.
  • Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sherman, K. M. (2011). An imagined community of avatars? A theoretical interrogation of second life as nation through the lens of Benedict Anderson’s imagined communities. In A. Ensslin & E. Muse (Eds.), Creating second lives. Community, identity and spatiality as constructions of the virtual (pp. 32–54). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sherry, J. F., Jr. (2000). Place, technology, and representation. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 273–278.
  • Siddiqui, S., & Turley, D. (2006). Extending the self in a digital world. In C. Pechmann & L. Price (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 33, pp. 647–648). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
  • Silverstone, R. (1999). Why study the media? London: SAGE.
  • Sloop, J. M., & Gunn, J. (2010). Status control: An admonition concerning the publicized privacy of social networking. The Communication Review, 13(4), 289–308.
  • Steinkuehler, C. A., & Williams, D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as third places. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 885–909.
  • Tenhunen, S. (2018). A village goes mobile. Telephony, mediation, and social change in rural India. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York, NY: Knopf.
  • Thompson, C., & Tambyah, S. (1999). Trying to be cosmopolitan. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 214–241.
  • Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Enchanting ethical consumerism. The case of community supported agriculture. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(3), 275–303.
  • Thompson, C. J., & Hirschman, E. C. (1995). Understanding the socialised body: A poststructuralist analysis of consumers’ self conceptions, body images, and self care practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 139–153.
  • Thornton, S. (1995). Club cultures: Music, media, and subcultural capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Tiidenberg, K., & Cruz, E. G. (2015). Selfies, image and the re-making of the body. Body & Society, 21(4), 1–26.
  • Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 122–138). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Urry, J., & Sheller, M. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.
  • Üstüner, T., & Holt, D. B. (2007). Dominated consumer acculturation: The social construction of poor migrant women’s consumer identity projects in a Turkish squatter. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 41–56.
  • Väliaho, P. (2010). Mapping the moving image. Gesture, thought and cinema circa 1900. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Vanden Abeele, M.-M. P. (2016). Mobile youth culture: A conceptual development. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 85–101.
  • Venkatesh, A., Karababa, E., & Ger, G. (2002). The emergence of the posthuman consumer and the fusion of the virtual and the real: A critical analysis of Sony’s Ad for memory stick™. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 446–452.
  • Visconti, L. M., Sherry, J. F., Jr., Borghini, S., & Anderson, L. (2010). Street art, sweet art? Reclaiming the “public” in public space Journal of Consumer Research, 37. doi:10.1086/652731
  • Watkins, R., & Molesworth, M. (2012). Attachment to virtual possessions in videogames. In R. W. Belk, S. Askegaard, & L. Scott (Eds.), Research in consumer behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 153–170). Bingley: Emerald Group.
  • Weber, M. (1971). Science as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), Essays in sociology (pp. 129–156). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Werbner, P. (2015). Introduction: The dialectics of cultural hybridity. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (2nd revised ed., pp. 1–28). London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Werbner, P., & Modood, T. (2015). Preface to the critique influence change edition. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (2nd revised ed., pp. XIV–XIX). London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Yadav, M., Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Mobile social media: The new hybrid element of digital marketing communications. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 335–343.
  • Young, R. (1995). Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture and race. London: Routledge.
  • YY (2018). Official website. Retrieved from: http://www.yy.com

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.