Service Science Management Engineering and Design (SSMED): a semiautomatic literature review

References

• Baccarani, C., & Golinelli, G. M. (2008). The entrepreneur and the frontiers of complexity. Sinergie, 75, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Badinelli, R., Barile, S., Ng, I., Polese, F., Saviano, M., & Di Nauta, P. (2012). Viable service systems and decision making in service management. Journal of Service Management, 23(4), 498–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barile, S., & Polese, F. (June, 2009). Service dominant logic and service science: A contribute deriving from network theories. In E. Gummesson, C. Mele, & F. Polese (Eds.), Service science, S-D logic and network theory (pp. 1–18). Napoli: Giannini.
   Google Scholar
• Barile, S., & Polese, F. (2010a). Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Barile, S., & Polese, F. (2010b). Smart service systems and viable service systems: Applying systems theory to service science. Service Science, 2(1–2), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Barile, S., Polese, F., Saviano, M., & Carrubbo, L. (2017). Service innovation in translational medicine. In T. Russo-Spena, C. Mele, & M. Nuutinen (Eds.), Innovating in practice (pp. 417–438). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2011). Foundations of systems thinking: The structure-system paradigm. In Contributions to theoretical and practical advances in management. A viable systems approach (VSA) (pp. 1-25). Avellino: International Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311.
   Google Scholar
• Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Goul, M., & Urban, S. (2008). Services science journey: Foundations, progress, challenges. In B. Hefley & W. Murphy (Eds.), Service science, management and engineering education for the 21st century. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, A., Cherry, G., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2017). Doing a systematic review: A student‘s guide. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Breidbach, C. F., & Maglio, P. P. (2015, May). A service science perspective on the role of ICT in service innovation. In J. Becker, J. Vom Brocke, M. De Marco (Eds.), Proceedings of ECIS. Münster, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge University and IBM. (Eds). (2007). Succeeding through service innovation. Discussion paper. Cambridge University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing.
   Google Scholar
• Carrubbo, L. (2013). La Co-creazione di valore nelle destinazioni turistiche. Roma: Rirea.
   Google Scholar
• Cassia, F., Cobelli, N., & Ugolini, M. (2017). The effects of goods-related and service-related B2B brand images on customer loyalty. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(5), 722–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassia, F., Ugolini, M. M., Cobelli, N., & Gill, L. (2015). Service-based vs. goods-based positioning of the product concept: Effects on customer perceived value. The TQM Journal, 27(2), 247–255.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley: Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, H. M., & Wineman, I. (2014). Factors associated with quality of life in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(8), 974–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B. C. K., & Park, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciasullo, M. V., Polese, F., Troisi, O., & Carrubbo, L. (2016, May). How service innovation contributes to co-create value in service networks. In T. Borangiu, M. Dragoicea, & H. Nóvoa (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on exploring services science (pp. 170–183). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Maio, C., Fenza, G., Gallo, M., Loia, V., & Senatore, S. (2014). Formal and relational concept analysis for fuzzy-based automatic semantic annotation. Applied Intelligence, 40(1), 154–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Maio, C., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Parente, M. (2016). Time aware knowledge extraction for microblog summarization on twitter. Information Fusion, 28(2), 60–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Maio, C., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Senatore, S. (2012). Hierarchical web resources retrieval by exploiting fuzzy formal concept analysis. Information Processing & Management, 48(3), 399–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Péry, C., Ageron, B., & Neubert, G. (2013). A service science framework to enhance value creation in Service Innovation projects. An RFID case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(2), 440–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edvardsson, B. (2014). Service-dominant logic and service science as lenses for service productivity. In J. Bessant, C. Lehmann, & K. M. Moeslein (Eds.), Driving service productivity (pp. 73–91). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzinga, P., Wolff, K. E., & Poelmans, J. (2012, August). Analyzing chat conversations of pedophiles with temporal relational semantic systems. In N. Memon & D. Zeng (Eds.), Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC) (pp. 242–249). Washington: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B. Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 291–314.
   Google Scholar
• Fenza, G., & Senatore, S. (2010). Friendly web services selection exploiting fuzzy formal concept analysis. Soft Computing, 14(8), 811–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, L. E., & Spohrer, J. C. (2013). The human side of service engineering. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(1), 2–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fynes, B., & Lally, A. M. (2008). Innovation in services: From service concepts to service experiences. In B. Hefley & W. Murphy (Eds.), Service science, management and engineering: Education for the 21st century (pp. 329–333). SpringerLink.
   Google Scholar
• Galvagno, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: A systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 643–683.
   Google Scholar
• Ganter, B., & Wille, R. (2012). Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. Boston: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., Smith, M. L., & McGaw, B. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Golinelli, G. M. (2010). Viable systems approach (VSA): Governing business dynamics. Padova: Cedam.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummesson, E., Mele, C., & Polese, F. (2009). Service science, SD logic and network theory: Integrating the perspectives for a new research agenda. In E. Gummesson, C. Mele, & F. Polese (Eds.), Service science, S-D logic and network theory (pp. 1–6). Napoli: Giannini.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, A., Högström, C., Radnor, Z., Friman, M., Heinonen, K., Jaakkola, E., & Mele, C. (2016). Developing service research – Paving the way to transdisciplinary research. Journal of Service Management, 27(1), 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. L., & Chiang, C. H. (2015). A bibliometric study of SSME in information systems research. Scientometrics, 102(3), 1835–1865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IfM and IBM. (2008). Succeeding through service innovation: A service perspective for education, research, business and government. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing.
   Google Scholar
• Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. F., Wang, J. J., Yu, H. L., & Yang, D. L. (2007, December). Services science, management, and engineering: A literature review in the perspective of management science. In M. Helander, M. Xie, R. Jiao & K. C. Tan (Eds.), Industrial engineering and engineering management, 2007 IEEE international conference on (pp. 1438–1441). Washington: IEEE Computer society.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Loia, V., Polese, F., Fenza, G., Troisi, O., & Maione, G. (2017). SSMED and its multidisciplinary nature: an automatic literature review. In E. Gummesson, C. Mele & F. Polese (Eds.). Proceeding of Service dominant logic, network and systems theory and service science: integrating three perspectives for a new service Agenda. The 5th Naples forum on service (pp. 1–14). Tricase, Italy: Youcanprint.
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., & Spohrer, J. C. (2012). Evolving service for a complex, resilient, and sustainable world. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13–14), 1491–1503.
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Gustafsson, A. (2016). Fostering a trans-disciplinary perspectives of service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2957–2963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Wessels, G. (2008). Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Systems Journal, 47(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Maglio, P. P. (2007). Service science, management and engineering (SSME): An interdisciplinary approach to service innovation. San Jose, CA: IBM Almaden Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Maglio, P. P. (2013). Service science 2.0. Service Science, 5(2), 85–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglio, P. P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J. T., & Spohrer, J. (2006). Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 81–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and E-business Management, 7(4), 395–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2(1–2), 126–135.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, C., Sebastiani, R., & Corsaro, D. (2013). Service innovation as a process of sense-making. Roma: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, Y., & Li, C. (2010, July). Enhancing query-oriented summarization based on sentence wikification. In Workshop of the 33rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval- SIGIR 2010 (pp. 32). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mihalcea, R., & Csomai, A. (2007, November). Wikify!: Linking documents to encyclopedic knowledge. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 233–242). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, D., & Witten, I. H. (2008, October). Learning to link with wikipedia. In D. Cheung & Y. J. Song (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management (pp. 509–518). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington: Computer Horizons.
   Google Scholar
• Neouchi, R., Tawfik, A. Y., & Frost, R. A. (2001, June). Towards a temporal extension of formal concept analysis. In E. Stroulia & S. Matwin (Eds.), Conference of the Canadian society for computational studies of intelligence (pp. 335–344). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (1996). La transdisciplinarit´e manifeste. Monaco: Rocher.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (1998). The transdisciplinary evolution of the University condition for sustainable development. In Centre International de Recherches et d’Etudes Transdisciplinaires (CIRET). Paris. Retrieved from http://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/bulletin/b12c8.php
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Burkhard, K. A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., & Rabinovich, E. (2010). Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. Journal of Service Research, 13(1), 4–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson, L. D. (2006). Service science: A new field for today’s economy. Computer, 39(8), 18–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phene, A., & Guisinger, S. (1998). The stature of the Journal of International Business Studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 621–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piciocchi, P., & Bassano, C. (2009). Governance and viability of franchising networks from a Viable Systems Approach (vSa). In E. Gummesson, C. Mele, & F. Polese (Eds.), Proceedings of The 2009 Naples Forum on Service. Service Dominant Logic, Service Science and Network Theory (pp. 1–10). Naples: Giannini Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Pinhanez, C., & Kontogiorgis, P. (2008, October 2–5). A proposal for a service science discipline classification system. Paper presented at the Frontiers in service Conference. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Polese, F. (2008). Service Science, Management and Engineering: Riflessioni su nascita e sviluppo della Scienza del Servizio. Impresa, Ambiente, Management, 2(2), 153–177.
   Google Scholar
• Polese, F., Barile, S., Loia, V., & Carrubbo, L. (2019). The demolition of service scientists’ cultural-boundaries. In P. Maglio, C. Kieliszewski, J. Spohrer, K. Lyons, L. Patrício, & Y. Sawatani (Eds..), Handbook of service science (Vol. II, pp. 1–13). Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadier, T. (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures, 36(4), 423–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhine, J. B., Pratt, J. G., Smith, B. M., Stuart, C. E., & Greenwood, J. A. (1940). Extra-sensory perception after sixty years. Oxford: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Saggese, S., Sarto, F., & Cuccurullo, C. (2016). Evolution of the debate on control enhancing mechanisms: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviano, M., Barile, S., Spohrer, J., & Caputo, F. (2017). A service research contribution to the global challenge of sustainability. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27, 951–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiley, D., Pugh, E., Parisa, K., & Mitchell, M. (2015). Apache Solr enterprise search server. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J. (2005, September 8). Emergence of service science: Services sciences, management, engineering (SSME) as the next frontier in innovation. Japan SSME Workshop, Tokyo Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J. (2006). Service Science, Management, and Engineering (SSME): A next frontier in education, employment, innovation, and economic growth. San Jose, California: IBM Almaden Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J. (2007). Service science. Journal of Grid Computing, Special Issue on Grid Economics and Business Models, 6(3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2010b). Service science: Toward a smarter planet. In G. Salvendy & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Introduction to service engineering (pp. 3–30). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., Anderson, L., Pass, N., & Ager, T. (2008, December). Service science and service-dominant logic. Paper Presented at the Otago Forum 2, Dunedin, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., Giuiusa, A., Demirkan, H., & Ing, D. (2013). Service science: Reframing progress with universities. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30, 561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., & Kwan, S. K. (2009). Service science, management, engineering, and design (SSMED): An emerging discipline–Outline and references. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 1(3), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2010a). Toward a science of service systems. In P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science (pp. 157–194). Boston: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stoshikj, M., Kryvinska, N., & Strauss, C. (2016). Service systems and service innovation: Two pillars of service science. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Száva‐Kováts, E. (2002). Unfounded attribution of the “half-life” index-number of literature obsolescence to Burton and Kebler: A literature science study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1098–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004a). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004b). The four service marketing myths: Remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 324–335.
   Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory – foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, J. K., Hua, P. H., Rousseau, R., & Sun, X. K. (2010). The journal download immediacy index (DII): Experiences using a Chinese full-text database. Scientometrics, 82(3), 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Z. H., & Zhang, M. L. (2014, October). Value propositions in accordance with service-dominant logic and service science: New insights into the Zhongguancun electrics market. In A. Wang, L. J. Jia & C. P. Dou (Eds.), Proceedings of 2014 IEEE international conference (pp. 177–182). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, K., & Reid, C. (2004). Assumptions, ambiguities, and possibilities in interdisciplinary population health research. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 95, 434–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar