The more the better? Exploring the effects of reviewer social networks on online reviews

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1983). Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(2), 146–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand public. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 727–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2016). The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 297–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, W. E., & Iyer, A. V. (1992). Information networks and market behavior. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 16(4), 305–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Eckel, C., Grossman, P. J., & Zame, W. (2001). Status in markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 161–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Ravid, S. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Iyengar, R. (2013). Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 567–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Schwartz, E. M. (2011). What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 869–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bienenstock, E. J., Bonacich, P., & Oliver, M. (1990). The effect of network density and homogeneity on attitude polarization. Social Networks, 12(2), 153–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheema, A., & Kaikati, A. M. (2010). The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 553–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, N. J., & Carlson, J. (2014). Examining the drivers and brand performance implications of customer engagement with brands in the social media environment. Journal of Brand Management, 21(6), 495–515.
   Google Scholar
• Dellarocas, C., & Narayan, R. (2006). A statistical measure of a population’s propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statistical Science, 21(2), 277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X. M., & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forer, L. 2017. The lowdown of social media influencers. Retrieved from https://www.marketingprofs.com/chirp/2017/31547/the-lowdown-on-social-media-influencers-infographic
   Google Scholar
• Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godes, D., & Silva, J. C. (2012). Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science, 31(3), 448–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, D. (2014) Are interest-based networks the way of the future? Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/drewhendricks/2014/10/16/are-interest-based-networks-the-way-of-the-future/#4beac367643f
   Google Scholar
• Hinz, O., Skiera, B., Barrot, C., & Becker, J. U. (2011). Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas, M. U., & Radha, H. (2011, June). Identifying influential nodes in online social networks using principal component centrality. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science, 30(2), 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanouse, D. E. (1984). Explaining negativity biases in evaluation and choice behavior: Theory and research. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 703–708). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R., Jr. 1972. Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones (Ed.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 47–62). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, C., & Bichler, M. (2008). Identification of influencers—Measuring influence in customer networks. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 233–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Tian, M., & Mahajan, N. (2014). O2O primer online-to-offline commerce in China. CKGSB Knowledge. Retrieved from http://knowledge.ckgsb.edu.cn/2014/09/30/technology/o2o-primer-online-to-offline-commerce-inchina/
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu-Thompkins, Y., & Rogerson, M. (2012). Rising to stardom: An empirical investigation of the diffusion of user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. J., Peres, R., & Shachar, R. (2013). On brands and word-of-mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 427–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Sun, B., & Kekre, S. (2015). The squeaky wheel gets the grease—An empirical analysis of customer voice and firm intervention on Twitter. Marketing Science, 34(5), 627–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2012). Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Science, 31(3), 372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, W. W., & Trusov, M. (2011). The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 444–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, C. (2014). CMO survey report: Highlights and insights. Retrieved from http://cmosurvey.org/files/2015/02/The_CMO_Survey-Highlights_and_Insights-Feb-2015_Compressed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Naik, P. A., & Raman, K. (2003). Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Hu, Y. J., & Ulmer, J. R. (2015). Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behavior. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 683–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soboleva, A., Burton, S., Mallik, G., & Khan, A. (2017). ‘Retweet for a chance to … ’: An analysis of what triggers consumers to engage in seeded eWOM on Twitter. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(13–14), 1120–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toubia, O., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Science, 32(3), 368–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, K., & Perez-Vega, R. (2017). Digital media and marketing interactivity. In G. Bell & B. Taheri (Eds.), Marketing communications: An advertising, promotion and branding perspective (pp. 151–166). Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, Y., Vadakkepatt, G. G., & Joshi, A. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Liu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2015). Social learning in networks of friends versus strangers. Marketing Science, 34(4), 573–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., & Duan, W. (2015). An empirical study of how third-party websites influence the feedback mechanism between online word-of-mouth and retail sales. Decision Support Systems, 76, 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar