The effects of competitive context on consumer response to price changes

References

• Bell, D. R., & Lattin, J. M. (2000). Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: The confounding effect of price response heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 19(2), 185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bemmaor, A. C., & Mouchoux, D. (1991). Measuring the short-term effect of in-store promotion and retail advertising on brand sales: A factorial experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 202–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijmolt, T. H. A., van Heerde, H. J., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2005). New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, XLII(May), 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Blattberg, R. C., & Wisniewski, K. J. (1989). Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Science, 8(4), 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogomolova, S., Dunn, S., Trinh, G., Taylor, J., & Volpe, R. J. (2015). Price promotion landscape in the US and UK: Depicting retail practice to inform future research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 25(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, R. N. (1989). The relationship between market characteristics and promotional price elasticities. Marketing Science, 8(2), 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briesch, R., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P. (1997). A comparative analysis of reference price models. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 202–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg, B. J., & Wathieu, L. (1996). Asymmetric promotion effects and brand positioning. Marketing Science, 15(4), 16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R. R., Harlam, B. A., Kahn, B. E., & Lodish, L. M. (1992). Comparing dynamic consumer choice in real and computer-simulated environments. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K., Siddarth, S., & Weinberg, C. B. (1999). The impact of heterogeneity in purchase timing and price responsiveness on estimates of sticker shock effects. Marketing Science, 18, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, P. J., & Brodie, R. J. (2000). Understanding the characteristics of price elasticities for frequently purchased packaged goods. Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 917–936.
   Google Scholar
• Dekimpe, M. G., Hanssens, D. M., & Silva-Risso, J. M. (1998). Long-run effects of price promotions in scanner markets. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1–2), 269–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, P. R., & Sawyer, A. G. (1990). The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, A. (1995). Empirical generalisations, theory, and method. Marketing Science, 14(3), G20–G28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fok, D., Horvath, C., Paap, R., & Franses, P. H. (2006). A hierarchical bayes error correction model to explain dynamic effects of price changes. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12(4, Fall), 378–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, T. B., Ryu, G., Chatterjee, S., McCarthy, M. S., Mothersbaugh, D. L., Milberg, S., & Gaeth, G. J. (2000). Asymmetric competition in choice and the leveraging of competitive disadvantages. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(December), 251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., Rose, J., & Greene, W. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, S. J., Kim, B.-D., Montgomery, A. L., & Rossi, P. E. (1995). Determinants of store-level price elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(February), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, J., Holbrook, M. B., & Kahn, B. (1986). Effects of competitive context and of additional information on price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, USA: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram, G., & Little, J. D. C. (1994). An empirical analysis of latitude of price acceptance in consumer package goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(December), 408.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi, L., & Raj, S. P. (1991). An empirical analysis of the relationship between brand loyalty and consumer price elasticity. Marketing Science, 10(2), 172–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. M., & Ehrenberg, A. (1993). The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician, 47(3), 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowengart, O. (2002). Reference price conceptualisations: An integrative framework of analysis. Journal of Marketing Management, 18, 145–171.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, T., & Papatla, P. (1995). Loyalty differences in the use of internal and external reference prices. Marketing Letters, 6(2), 111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005). Reference price research: Review and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(October), 84–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, K., Srinivasan, S., & Franses, P. H. (2007). When do price thresholds matter in retail categories? Marketing Science, 26(1), 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendran, K. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1994). Contextual and temporal components of reference price. Journal of Marketing, 58(January), 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, J. S. (1992). The effect of price promotions on variability in product category sales. Marketing Science, 11(3), 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A. (1975). Demand artifacts in laboratory experiments in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(March), 20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, J., & Ehrenberg, A. (2004). Consistent consumer responses to price changes. Australasian Marketing Journal, 12(3), 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sethuraman, R., Srinivasan, V., & Kim, D. (1999). Asymmetric and neighborhood cross-price effects: Some empirical generalizations. Marketing Science, 18(No 1), 23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1989). Price management. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, K., & Raj, S. P. (1997). Quality tier competition: How price change influences brand choice and category choice. Journal of Marketing, 61(July), 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, G. J., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Competitive price and quality under asymmetric information. Marketing Science, 6(3), 240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totten, J. C., & Block, M. (1994). Analyzing sales promotions. Chicago: Dartnell Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39(10), 1179–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heerde, H. J., Gupta, S., & Wittink, D. R. (2003). Is 75% of the sales promotion bump due to brand switching? No, only 33% is. Journal of Marketing Research, XL, 481–491.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhuele, M., & Dreze, X. (2002). Measuring the price knowledge shoppers bring to the store. The Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, B. T., Welch, K. B., Galecki, A. T., & Gillespie, B. W. (2007). Linear mixed models: A practical guide to using statistical software. Florida, US: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winer, R. S. (2006). Pricing. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G., & Ozcan, T. (2009). Customer choices of manufacturer versus retailer brands in alternative price and usage contexts. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(2), 100–108.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., Gendall, P., & Lewis, T. (1999). Making survey-based price experiments more accurate. Journal of the Market Research Society, 41(2), 245–249.
   Google Scholar
• Zenor, M. J., Bronnenberg, B. J., & McAlister, L. (1998). The impact of marketing policy on promotional price elasticities and baseline sales. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 5(1), 25–32.
   Google Scholar