Digital practices tracing: studying consumer lurking in digital environments

References

• Abidin, C. (2021). From “networked publics” to “refracted publics”: A companion framework for researching “below the radar” studies. Studies Social Media + Society, 7(1), 205630512098445. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, C., & Thompson, T. L. (2016). Researching a posthuman world: Interviews with digital objects. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Aipperspach, R., Rattenbury, T. L., Woodruff, A., Anderson, K., Canny, J. F., & Aoki, P. (2006). Ethno-mining: integrating numbers and words from the ground up (Report UCB/EECS-2006, 125). Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley Tech. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2006/EECS-2006-124.html
   Google Scholar
• Airoldi, M., & Rokka, J. (2022). Algorithmic consumer culture. Consumption Markets & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988269
   Google Scholar
• Antin, J., & Cheshire, C. (2010). Readers are not free-riders: Reading as a form of participation on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW 2010 (pp. 127–130). https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718942
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand public. The Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashman, R., Solomon, M. R., & Wolny, J. (2015). An old model for a new age: Consumer decision making in participatory digital culture. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 14(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539215x14373846805743
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, B., Wider, S., Williams, R., Stevenson, N., Whitehead, E., & Canter, A. (2016). Defining branded content for the digital age. The industry experts’ views on branded content as a new marketing communications concept. A collaborative research project commissioned by the BCMA and conducted by Oxford Brookes University and Ipsos MORI.
   Google Scholar
• Audy Martínek, P. (2021). Mapping methods of research on consumer engagement with brands on social media: A literature review. Methodological Innovations, 14(1), 205979912098538. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120985384
   Google Scholar
• Bainotti, L., Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2020). From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back: Studying Instagram stories with digital methods. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3656–3676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820960071
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2014). Digital consumption and the extended self. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(11–12), 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.939217
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., Caldwell, M., Devinney, T. M., Eckhardt, G. M., Henry, P., Kozinets, R., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2018). Envisioning consumers: How videography can contribute to marketing knowledge. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(5–6), 432–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1377754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., Weijo, H., & Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Enchantment and perpetual desire: Theorizing disenchanted enchantment and technology adoption. Marketing Theory, 21(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593120961461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benevenuto, F., Rodrigues, T., Cha, M., & Almeida, V. (2009). Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. IMC ’09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/1644893.1644900
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boase, J., & Ling, R. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccia Artieri, G., Brilli, S., & Zurovac, E. (2021). Below the radar: Private groups, locked platforms, and ephemeral content—Introduction to the special issue. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 205630512198893. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., Moon, B., Avijit, P., & Münch, F. (2016). Towards a typology of hashtag publics: A large-scale comparative study of user engagement across trending topics. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B., Malthouse, E., & Schaedel, U. (2009). An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 321–331. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2017). Qualitative research in digital environments: A research toolkit. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caliandro, A. (2018). Digital methods for ethnography: Analytical concepts for Ethnographers exploring social media environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(5), 551–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliandro, A., Garavaglia, E., Sturiale, V., & DiLeva, A. (2021). Older people and smartphone practices in everyday life: An inquire on digital sociality of Italian older users. The Communication Review, 24(1), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2021.1904771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W. (2015). Mobile communication and network privatism: A literature review of the implications for diverse, weak, and new ties. Review of Communication Research, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2015.03.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Carah, N., & Angus, D. (2018). Algorithmic brand culture: Participatory labour, machine learning and branding on social media. Media, Culture & Society, 40(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718754648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Li, X., & Yao, D. (2019). Seeking the support of the silent majority: Are lurking users valuable to UGC platforms? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-00624-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-In-Practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3641–3656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818756290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (2011). Listening, not lurking: The neglected form of participation. In Cultures of participation (pp. 63–77). Peter Lang. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/listening-not-lurking-the-neglected-form-of-participation/
   Google Scholar
• Culotta, A., & Cutler, J. (2016). Mining brand perceptions from twitter social networks. Marketing Science, 35(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denegri-Knott, J., Jenkins, R., & Lindley, S. (2020). What is digital possession and how to study it: A conversation with Russell Belk, Rebecca Mardon, Giana M. Eckhardt, Varala Maraj, Will Odom, Massimo Airoldi, Alessandro Caliandro, Mike Molesworth and Alessandro Gandini. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(9–10), 942–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1761864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denegri-Knott, J., Jenkins, R., & Molesworth, M. (2022). Transformations in digital virtual consumption.
   Google Scholar
• Denegri‐knott, J., & Molesworth, M. (2010). Concepts and practices of digital virtual consumption. Consumption Markets & Culture, 13(2), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860903562130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denegri-Knott, J., & Molesworth, M. (2013). Redistributed consumer desire in digital virtual worlds of consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 29( 13-14), 1561-1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.821420
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M., Blank, P., & Speers, L. (2012). A life lived in media. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 6(1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/6/1/000110/000110.html
   Google Scholar
• DeVeirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2016). Why are people interacting with brands on Facebook: Unraveling consumers’ motivations for lurking and posting on Facebook brand pages. EMAC 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 245–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, B., Shrimpton, H., Clemence, H., Thomas, F., Whyte-Smith, H., & Abboud, T. (2018). Ipsos thinks: Beyond binary: The lives and choices of generation Z. Ipsos MORI. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2018-08/ipsos_-_beyond_binary_-_the_lives_and_choices_of_gen_z.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., & Boyd, D. M. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., & Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment: Monitoring behavior in daily life settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, T., & Castro, A. (2020). Understanding drivers and outcomes of lurking vs. posting engagement behaviours in social media-based brand communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(7–8), 660–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1724179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Rosales, A., Loos, E., Peine, A., Beneito-Montagut, R., Blanche, D., & Östlund, B. (2019). Methodological strategies to understand smartphone practices for social connectedness in later life. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 46–64). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Figeac, J., & Chaulet, J. (2018). Video-Ethnography of social media apps’ connection cues in public settings. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917747642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, J., Plagnol, A., & Corr, P. J. (2017). Passive and active Facebook use measure (PAUM): Validation and relationship to the reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gorin, A. A., & Stone, A. A. (2001). Recall biases and cognitive errors in retrospective self-reports: A call for momentary assessments. In A. Baum, T. Revenson, J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 405–413). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, D., Ahlbom, C. P., Beitelspacher, L., Noble, S. M., & Nordfält, J. (2018). In-Store mobile phone use and customer shopping behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.17.0277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. The American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, B., Wiertz, C., & Arnould, E. (2015). Exploring consumptive moments of value-creating practice in online community. Psychology & Marketing, 32(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied, and everyday. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinmardi, H., Ghasemian, A., Clauset, A., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2021). Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), e2101967118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101967118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, N., Agarwal, P., & Pruthi, J. (2015). HashJacker-Detection and analysis of hashtag hijacking on Twitter. International Journal of Computer Applications, 114(19), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.5120/20085-2111
   Google Scholar
• Kawaf, F. (2019). Capturing digital experience: The method of screencast videography. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefi, H., & Maar, D. (2020). The power of lurking: Assessing the online experience of luxury brand fan page followers. Journal of Business Research, 117, 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R., Patterson, A., & Ashman, R. (2017). Networks of desire: How technology increases our passion to consume. The Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., Scaraboto, D., & Parmentier, M. A. (2018). Evolving netnography: How brand auto-ethnography, a netnographic sensibility, and more-than-human netnography can transform your research. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3–4), 231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner, S. (2016). Read only: The persistence of lurking in web 2.0. First Monday, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i6.6789
   Google Scholar
• Leban, M., Seo, Y., & Voyer, B. G. (2020). Transformational effects of social media lurking practices on luxury consumption. Journal of Business Research, 116(August), 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.010
   Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P., & Quinton, S. (2018). More-Than-Human netnography. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3–4), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1431303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchanda, P., Packard, G., & Pattabhiramaiah, A. (2015). Social dollars: The economic impact of customer participation in a firm-sponsored online customer Community. Marketing Science, 34(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Moats, D. (2015). Mapping controversies with social media: The case for symmetry. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604176
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, F. (2019, March 31). 4 in 10 Facebookers now browsing the site passively - GlobalWebIndex Blog. [online] GlobalWebIndex Blog. https://blog.globalwebindex.com/chart-of-the-day/4-in-10-facebookers-now-browsing-the-site-passively/
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, D., McGregor, M., & Brown, B. (2015 August 24 - 27). From in the wild to in vivo: Video analysis of mobile device use. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 494–503).
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in big data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Thomas, A., Dessart, L., & Veloutsou, C. (2020). Digital ecosystem and consumer engagement: A socio-technical perspective. Journal of Business Research, 121, 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. A., Cheong, H. J., & McMillan, S. J. (2013). Posting, lurking, and networking: Behaviors and characteristics of consumers in the context of user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2013.826552
   Google Scholar
• Muller, M. (2012). Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition: Lurking and contributing in enterprise social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’12) (pp. 253–256). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145245.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Leiva, F., Hernández-Méndez, J., & Gómez-Carmona, D. (2019). Measuring advertising effectiveness in travel 2.0 websites through eye-tracking technology. Physiology & Behavior, 200, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederer, S., & Colombo, G. (2019). Visual methodologies for networked images: Designing visualizations for collaborative research, cross-platform analysis, and public participation. Revista Diseña, 14(14), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.14.40-67
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. In Proceedings of Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems 2001 (pp. 1521–1530).
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Silent participants: Getting to know lurkers better. In C. Lueg, C. Lueg (Eds.), Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 110–132). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., & Andrews, D. (2004). What lurkers and posters think of each other [Paper presentation]. Internet and the Digital Economy Track of the Thirty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 5–8).
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-Public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5985-x
   Google Scholar
• Ohme, J., Araujo, T., de Vreese, C. H., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2020). Mobile data donations: Assessing self-report accuracy and sample biases with the iOS screen time function. Mobile Media & Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920959106
   Google Scholar
• Ørmen, J., & Thorhauge, A. M. (2015). Smartphone log data in a qualitative perspective. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914565845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagani, M., Hofacker, C. F., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2011). The influence of personality on active and passive use of social networking sites. Psychology and Marketing, 28(5), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., & Morgan, J. (2013). Short‐term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, E., & Duffy, K. (2018). A netnographic sensibility: Developing the netnographic/social listening boundaries. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3–4), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1450282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridings, C., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2006). Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 18(16), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01816
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018). From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’ investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence, 24(1), 50–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risi, E., Bonini, T., & Pronzato, R. (2020). Algorithmic media in everyday life. An experience with auto-ethnographic student diaries. Etnografia E Ricerca Qualitativa, 13(3), 407–422.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2017). Foundations of digital methods: Query design. In M. T. Schäfer, & M. T. Schäfer (Eds.), The datafied society: Studying culture through data (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2018). Otherwise engaged: Social media from vanity metrics to critical analytics. International Journal of Communication, 12, 23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Niederer, S. (2020). The politics of social media manipulation. Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohm, A., Kaltcheva, V. D., & Milne, G. R. (2013). A mixed-method approach to examining brand-consumer interactions driven by social media. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2013-0009
   Google Scholar
• Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2019). Smartphone usage diversity among older people. In S. Sayago (Ed.), Perspectives on human-computer interaction research with older people (pp. 51–66). Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06076-3_4
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, B., & Brito, E. P. (2017). How virtual brand community traces may increase fan engagement in brand pages. Business Horizons, 60(3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhleder, K., & Jordan, B. (1997). Capturing complex, distributed activities: Video-based interaction analysis as a component of workplace ethnography. In A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 246–275). Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, H., Muniz, A., & Arnould, E. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schivinski, B., Christodoulides, G., & Dabrowski, D. (2016). Measuring consumers’ engagement with brand-related social-media content: Development and validation of a scale that identifies levels of social-media engagement with brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1), 64–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, A. E. (2005). Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. The Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1086/432235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, V., & Rafaeli, S. (2006, May 23-26). Invisible participants: How cultural capital relates to lurking behavior. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2020). Integrating survey data and digital trace data: Key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. A., & Broderick, J. E. (2007). Real-Time data collection for pain: Appraisal and current status. Pain Medicine, 8(3), S85–S93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00372.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, N., Rau, P., & Ma, L. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. C., Liu, S. B., Muller, M., Lin, J., & Drews, C. (2006). Unobtrusive but invasive: Using screen recording to collect field data on computer-mediated interaction. In Proceedings of CSCW ’06 (pp. 479–482). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., Locander, W., & Pollio, H. (1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. The Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/209203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifiro, B. M., & Gerson, J. (2019). Social media usage patterns: Research note regarding the lack of universal validated measures for active and passive use. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 205630511984874. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119848743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
   Google Scholar
• van Dongen, P., Wakkary, R., Tomico, O., & Wensveen, S. (2019). Towards a postphenomenological approach to wearable technology through design journeys (Version1). Loughborough University. https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.9724649.v1
   Google Scholar
• Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2021). Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society, 24(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510387558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, T., Bounegru, L., Gray, J., & Rogers, R. (2018). A reality check (list) for digital methods. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4195–4217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. (2016). Toward a theory of technological mediation: A program for postphenomenological research. In J. Friis, R. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and postphenomenology: The Manhattan papers (pp. 189–204). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? a critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicari, S., & Kirby, D. (2022). Digital platforms as socio-cultural artifacts: Developing digital methods for cultural research. Information, Communication & Society, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2027498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vindenes, J., & Wasson, B. (2021). A postphenomenological framework for studying user experience of immersive virtual reality. Front Virtual Real, 2(656423).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei, G., Lim, E.-P., & Zhu, F. (2015). (2015, May 26–29). Characterizing silent users in social media communities. In Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, (pp. 140–149). Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., Treré, E., & Bonini, T. (2022). The emergence of algorithmic solidarity: Unveiling mutual aid practices and resistance among Chinese delivery workers. Media International Australia, 183(1) 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M., Barocas, S., Boyd, D., Crawford, K., Keller, E., Gangadharan, S. P., Goodman, A., Hollander, R., Koenig, B. A., Metcalf, J., Narayanan, A., Nelson, A., Pasquale, F., & Lewitter, F. (2017). Ten Simple rules for responsible big data research. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(3), e1005399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar