Reframing art online through collective meaning-making

References

• Aboubaker Ettis, S. (2017). Examining the relationships between online store atmospheric color, flow experience and consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1086/432230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M., & Crié, D. (2018). I virtually try it … I want it! virtual fitting room: A tool to increase on-line and off-line exploratory behavior, patronage and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., Kozinets, R. V., & Elliott, R. (2005). Videography in marketing and consumer research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510592418
   Google Scholar
• Benford, S., Bowers, J., Fahlén, L. E., Greenhalgh, C., & Snowdon, D. (1995). User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 242–249.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, S., Bowers, J., Fahlén, L. E., Greenhalgh, C., & Snowdon, D. (1997). Embodiments, avatars, clones and agents for multi-user, multi-sensory virtual worlds. Multimedia Systems, 5(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005300050045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, R., Garg, R., Chhikara, R., Kataria, A., & Talwar, V. (2021). Sensory Marketing—A Review and Research Agenda. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 25(4), 31.
   Google Scholar
• Biehl-Missal, B., & Saren, M. (2012). Atmospheres of seduction: A critique of aesthetic marketing practices. Journal of Macromarketing, 32(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146711433650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, B., & Vom Lehn, D. (2021). Atmospheres as dynamic configurations: The case of a museum and a techno club. In D. M. Federica & V. Marilena (Eds.), The metamorphosis of cultural and creative organizations (pp. 27–39). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borges, A., Chebat, J.-C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Does a companion always enhance the shopping experience? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(4), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J., Pycock, J., & O’Brien, J. (1996). Talk and embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238404
   Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canniford, R., Riach, K., & Hill, T. (2018). Nosenography: How smell constitutes meaning, identity and temporal experience in spatial assemblages. Marketing Theory, 18(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117732462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S., Kramer, T., & Wong, E. M. (2018). Do touch interface users feel more engaged? The impact of input device type on online shoppers’ engagement, affect, and purchase decisions. Psychology & Marketing, 35(11), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colm, L., Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2017). When service customers do not consume in isolation: A typology of customer copresence influence modes (CCIMs). Journal of Service Research, 20(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517690025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cova, B., & Pace, S. (2006). Brand community of convenience products: New forms of customer empowerment - the case ‘my nutella the community’. European Journal of Marketing; Bradford, 40(9/10), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610681023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, P. (1982). Merleau-Ponty: Perception into art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 22(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/22.2.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, D., Sitz, L., & Rémy, E. (2011). Embodied ethnicity: The ethnic affiliation grounded in the body. Consumption Markets & Culture, 14(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2011.574834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Purity and danger. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evanschitzky, H., Sharma, A., & Prykop, C. (2012). The role of the sales employee in securing customer satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing; Bradford, 46(3/4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211202576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, L. (2020). ‘Beginning of a new era’: How culture went virtual in the face of crisis. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2020/apr/08/art-virtual-reality-coronavirus-vr
   Google Scholar
• Finsterwalder, J., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2011). Co-creation by engaging beyond oneself: The influence of task contribution on perceived customer-to-customer social interaction during a group service encounter. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(7), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2011.599494
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, C. (2013). Cognition, knowing and learning in the flesh: Six views on embodied knowing in organization studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. SAGE Publications. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=743521
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Lehn, D. V., & Osborne, J. (2005). Interaction and interactives: Collaboration and participation with computer-based exhibits. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505047343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Vom Lehn, D. (2008). Configuring ‘Interactivity’: Enhancing engagement in science centres and museums. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, P., & Din, H. (2007). The digital museum: A think guide. Amer Assn of Museums. http://www.amazon.com/dp/1933253096
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Stivers, T. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science & Medicine, 49(11), 1501–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00219-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, T., Canniford, R., & Mol, J. (2014). Non-representational marketing theory. Marketing Theory, 14(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114533232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S., & Greenhalgh, C. (2000). Object-focused interaction in collaborative virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(4), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/365058.365088
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124100129023990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C., & Fraser, M. (2006). (Im)materiality, virtual reality and interaction: Grounding the ‘virtual’ in studies of technology in action. The Sociological Review, 54(4), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A. (2007). Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1395–1416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607068258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, A. H.-C., Oh, J., & Scheinbaum, A. C. (2020). Interactive music for multisensory e-commerce: The moderating role of online consumer involvement in experiential value, cognitive value, and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 37(8), 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari, A., Taheri, B., & Vom Lehn, D. (2013). Cultural consumption, interactive sociality, and the museum. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(15–16), 1729–1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.811095
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript Notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A., Charters, S., Wang, J. J., & Grohmann, B. (2020). A multi-sensory and embodied understanding of wine consumption. Journal of Wine Research, 31(4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1854700
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (2003). Speaking of art as embodied imagination: A multisensory approach to understanding aesthetic experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1086/376802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R. (2020). Sounds on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2018). Virtual exhibitions and communication factors. Museum Management & Curatorship, 33(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1466190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, E., Smith, M. P., Wilson, P. F., & Williams, M. A. (2021). Digital responses of UK museum exhibitions to the COVID-19 crisis, March–June 2020. Curator the Museum Journal, 64(3), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. (2002). Can consumers escape the market? Emancipatory illuminations from burning man. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/339919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of star trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/321948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R., Sherry, J., Jr., Storm, D., Duhachek, A., Nuttavuthisit, K., & DeBerry-Spence, B. (2004). Ludic agency and retail spectacle. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1086/425101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuru, T.-K., & Närvänen, E. (2019). Embodied interaction in customer experience: A phenomenological study of group fitness. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(13–14), 1241–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1649295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, A., Keeling, D., & Newholm, T. (2011). Virtual communities come of age: Parallel service, value, and propositions offered in communal online space. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(3–4), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.545679
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, L., & Toadvine, T. (2007). The Merleau-Ponty reader. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, V. M., Irigaray, H. A. R., & Lourenco, C. (2019). Consumer engagement on social media: Insights from a virtual brand community. Qualitative Market Research; Bradford, 22(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2017-0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, N. (2021). The embodiment of consumer knowledge. The Journal of Consumer Research, ucab003. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab003
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A. E., & Luk, S. T. K. (2011). Interaction behaviors leading to comfort in the service encounter. The Journal of Services Marketing; Santa Barbara, 25(3), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041111129164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1926). The objective reality of perspectives. In E. S. Brightman (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth international congress of philosophy (pp. 75–85).
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1932). The physical thing. In E. M. Arthur (Ed.), The philosophy of the present (pp. 119–139). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the perspective of a social behaviourist. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Signs. Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). The world of perception (O. Davis, Trans.). Routledge. ( Original work published 1948)
   Google Scholar
• Min, H. J., & Peñaloza, L. (2019). The agentic body in immigrant maternal identity reconstruction: Embodiment, consumption, acculturation. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(3), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1494590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, R. F., & Riedel, A. S. (2020). ‘Touch it, swipe it, shake it’: Does the emergence of haptic touch in mobile retailing advertising improve its effectiveness? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniz, A. M., Jr., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1086/319618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C. D., & Sixsmith, J. (1999). The corporeal body in virtual reality. Ethos, 27(3), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1999.27.3.315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, R. (2010). New directions for customer-to-customer interaction research. The Journal of Services Marketing; Santa Barbara, 24(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011017916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, T. (2010). Dangling conversations: Web-forum use by a symphony orchestra’s audience members. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7–8), 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.481866
   Google Scholar
• Parry, R. (2010). Museums in a digital age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., & Larsen, G. (2019). Listening to consumption: Towards a sonic turn in consumer research. Marketing Theory, 19(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118787583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, O., Velasco, C., & Spence, C. (2019). Digital sensory marketing: Integrating new technologies into multisensory online experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45, 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, J. B., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). The experience economy. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, C., Rodner, V., & Rojas-Gaviria, P. (2022). Landing in affective atmospheres. Marketing Theory, (3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931221076561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokka, J., Hietanen, J., & Brownlie, D. (2018). Screening marketing: Videography and the expanding horizons of filmic research. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(5–6), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1403112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. S., Massiah, C., & Fisk, R. P. (2011). An expanded servicescape perspective. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. B., & Bourgeois, P. L. (2002). Role taking, corporeal intersubjectivity, and self: Mead and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today, 34(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday199034219
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures in conversation: Volumes I and II. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., Albert, M., Muñiz, J., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. E. (2005). Visual consumption. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R., Cayla, J., Cova, B., Fischer, E., & Kozinets, R. (2017). Selling pain to the saturated self. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. A. (2014). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stavraki, G., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Clarke, J. (2018). The appropriation cycle: Novice and expert consumers. European Journal of Marketing, 52(9/10), 1886–1908. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2017-0527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman, C., Roberts, G., Medway, D., Millington, S., & Platt, L. (2020). (Re)thinking place atmospheres in marketing theory. Marketing Theory, 21(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593120920344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, L., Maclaran, P., & Brown, S. (2019). An embodied approach to consumer experiences: The hollister brandscape. European Journal of Marketing; Bradford, 53(4), 806–828. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2017-0558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, S. A. J. (2012). Enkinaesthesia: The essential sensuous background for co-agency. In Z. Radman (Ed.), Knowing without thinking: Mind, action, cognition and the phenomenon of the background (pp. 167–186). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. J., & Hirschman, E. C. (1998). An existential analysis of the embodied self in postmodern consumer culture. Consumption Markets & Culture, 2(4), 401–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.1998.9670323
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. (1984). The body and social theory. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Tutt, D., & Hindmarsh, J. (2011). Reenactments at work: Demonstrating conduct in data sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.591765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtonen, A., Markuksela, V., & Moisander, J. (2010). Doing sensory ethnography in consumer research. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00876.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Lehn, D. (2006). Embodying experience: A video‐based examination of visitors’ conduct and interaction in museums. European Journal of Marketing, 40(11/12), 1340–1359. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610702849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Lehn, D. (2010). Discovering ‘experience-ables’: Socially including visually impaired people in art museums. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7–8), 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672571003780155
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J., den Ambtman, A., Bloemer, J., Horváth, C., Ramaseshan, B., van de Klundert, J., Canli, Z. G., Kandampully, J., & Aksoy, L. (2013). Managing brands and customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Service Management; Bingley, 24(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231311326978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakhlef, A. (2015). Customer experience within retail environments: An embodied, spatial approach. Marketing Theory, 15(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115569016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., Wu, J. P., Zhang, Q., & Xu, S. (2013). Transforming visitors into members in online brand communities: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2438–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar