Designing and developing a programme-focused assessment strategy: a case study

References

• Ascough, R. S. (2011). Learning (About) outcomes: How the focus on assessment can help overall course design. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41, 44–61.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18, 57–75.10.1080/0729436990180105
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 399–413.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Freeman, M., James, R., Joughin, G., Sadler, R., Dochy, F., … Fitzgerald, T. (2010). Student assessment for learning in and after courses. Sydney: University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120.10.3102/0034654312474350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, R. (2002). Making professional development flexible: A case study. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 17, 251–258.10.1080/0268051022000048246
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M., Henderson, S., & Bustamante, R. (2015). Assessment leaders’ perspectives of institutional cultures of assessment: A Delphi study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2, 28–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, O. A. B. (2011). Learning theories and assessment methodologies – An engineering educational perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 327–339.10.1080/03043797.2011.591486
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Moule, P. (2007). Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: A new approach. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 15, 37–50.10.1080/09687760601129588
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2009). Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year. Scottish Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) for Higher Education. Mansfield: All Enhancement Themes.
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan, L., Brown, M., Maguire, M., Harding, N., Walsh, E., Gallagher, G., & McDermott, G. (2015). Assessment feedback in first year using digital technologies – Preliminary findings from an Irish multiinstitutional project. Poster session presented at The International Assessment in Higher Education Conference, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2009). Assessing the online learner: Resources and strategies for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Programme Assessment Strategies. (2012). The case for programme focused assessment: PASS position paper. Programme Assessment Strategies. Retrieved from http://www.pass.brad.ac.uk/position-paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Race, P., Brown, S., & Smith, B. (2005). 500 tips on assessment. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J. A. (2013). Case studies in making assessment efficient while developing student professionalism and managing transition. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38, 582–594.10.1080/03043797.2013.824409
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2004). E-Moderating; the key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., de Freitas, S., & Conole, G. (2010). An introduction to rethinking learning for a digital age. In H. Beetham, R. Sharpe, & S. de Freitas (Eds.), Rethinking learning for a digital age: How learners are shaping their own experience (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, O. (2013). Supporting students in online open and distance learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, O. (2014). Technology supported assessment for retention. In L. Clouder, C. Brougham, S. Jewell, & G. Steventon (Eds.), Captivation: Student engagement and development through assessment (pp. 181–196). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Speck, B. W. (1998). Unveiling some of the mystery of professional judgment in classroom assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 17–31.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E., & Brunton, J. (2014, October 27). Assessment strategy: Designing and developing assessments for online distance education. In A. A. Moreira Teixeira & A. Szűcs (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight EDEN Research Workshop, challenges for research into open and distance learning: Doing things better – Doing better things (pp. 455–460). Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D. M. (2008). Accelerating the assessment agenda: Thinking outside the black box. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Cornelious, L. F. (2005). Preparing instructors for quality online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8, 216–223.
   Google Scholar