Open educational resources: an analysis of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities student preferences

References

• Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S [online]. Available from: https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthecurriculum2014.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities (Report). Menlo Park, CA: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, T., Cook, L., Hill, N., & Stevens, K. (2010). An exploratory analysis of textbook usage and study habits: Misconceptions and barriers to success. College Teaching, 59(1), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Caudill, J. (2011). Using OpenCourseWare to enhance on-campus educational programs. TCC Worldwide Online Conference Refereed Proceedings (pp. 43–47). Retrieved from: http://etec.hawaii.edu/proceedings/2011/[Accessed 15 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Christie, A., Pollitz, J. H., & Middleton, C. (2009). Student strategies for coping with textbook costs and the role of library course reserves. Libraries and the Academy, 9(4), 491–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coladarci, T., Cobb, C. D., Minium, E. W., & Clarke, R. C. (2010). Fundamentals of statistical reasoning in education. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, K. K., & Davidson, M. M. (2013). General education oral communication assessment and student preferences for learning: E-textbook versus paper textbook. Communication Teacher, 27(2), 111–125.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2013). Students have greater access to textbook information. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton III, J., Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The four ‘R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning, 25(1), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howle, E. (2008, August). Affordability of college textbooks: Textbook prices have risen significantly in the last four years, but some strategies may help to control these costs for students [online]. California State Auditor Report. Retrieved from http://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2007-116.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at the Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content, Logan, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Kelton, K., Guilloteau, N., & Blyth, C. (2017). Français interactif. Austin, Texas: Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning (COERLL).
   Google Scholar
• Masterman, E. (2016). Bringing open educational practice to a research-oriented university: Prospects and challenges. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1, 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, M., & Schrier, T. (2015). Digital or printed textbooks: Which do students prefer and why? Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(2), 166–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. (2017). About Minnesota State. Retrieved from: http://www.mnscu.edu/system/index.html [Accessed 15 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, J. (2016, January 21). ‘Open educational resources survey’, Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M. (2012, December 24). The college textbook bubble and how the ‘open educational resources’ movement is going up against the textbook cartel. Retrieved from: http://www.aei.org/publication/the-college-textbook-bubble-and-how-the-open-educational-resources-movement-is-going-up-against-the-textbook-cartel/[Accessed 15 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Senack, E. Fixing the broken textbook market: How students respond to high textbook costs and demand alternatives (Report). U.S. PIRG Education Fund and the Student PRIGS. [2014, January 27].
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries. Final report [online]. Retrieved from: www.unesco.org/iiep/eng/focus/opensrc/PDF/OERForumFinalReport.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open Educational Resources: A review of the literature. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 781–789). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, D., Williams, L., DeMarte, D., & Hilton, J. (2016). The tidewater Z-degree and the INTRO model for sustaining OER adoption. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 41.
   Google Scholar