Investigating the effectiveness of iPad based language learning in the UAE context

References

• Ahmad, P., & Brogan, M. (2013). Scholarly use of e-books in a virtual academic environment: A case study. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 43(3), 189–213.
   Google Scholar
• Ber, J., Lombardo, N., Honisett, A., Jones, P., & Weber, A. (2013). Assessing user preferences for e-readers and tablets. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32(1), 1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2003). Research in Education. Boston: Library of Congress Cataloguing –in-publication data.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. (2014). Can tablet computers enhance learning in further education? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(6), 755–875. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, R., & French, D. P. (2008). How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programs? A meta- analysis. Psychology and Health. ISSN: 0887-0446 (Print) 1476-8321 (Online) Journal homepage. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gpsh20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. J. (2012). An iPad education? Diverse. Retrieved from www.diverseeducation.com
   Google Scholar
• Cruaud, C. (2016). The playful frame: Gamification in a French-as-a foreign-language class. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2016.1213268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, E. (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York, NY: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, D. (2002). The paperless classroom: E-filing and e-valuating students’ work in English Composition. Teaching English in the Two-year College, 30(2), 162–178.
   Google Scholar
• Doane, A. N., Pearson, M. R., & Kelley, M. L. (2014). Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Computers in Human Behaviour, 36(1), 154–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Google books, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Enriquez, A. (2010). Enhancing student performance using tablet computers. College Teaching, 58(3), 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Esch, K., & John, O. (2004). New insights into foreign language learning and teaching. Wissenschaften: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2014). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York,
   Google Scholar
• Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Lapp, D. (2015). iPad deployment in a diverse urban high school: A formative experiment. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 31(2), 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, J., Kulzy, W., & Appleget, J. (2012). Using factor analysis with survey data. California: Naval Postgraduate School.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L. (2012). Digital technologies and English instruction in China’s higher education System. Teacher Development: an International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(2), 161–179.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, M. (2011). Presenting with iPads. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 8(4), 441–448.
   Google Scholar
• Ghezzi, A., Rangone, A., & Balocco, R. (2013). Technology diffusion theory revisited: A regulation, environment, strategy, technology model for technology activation analysis of mobile ICT. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(10), 1223–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitsaki, C., & Robby, M. A. (2014). Post-secondary students using the iPad to learn English: An Impact Study. Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 6(4), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gitsaki, C., Robby, M. A., Priest, T., Hamdan, K., & Ben-Chabane, Y. (2013). A research agenda for the UAE iPad initiative. Gulf Perspectives, 10(2). Retrieved from http://the.zu.ac.ae
   Google Scholar
• Grigoryan, T. (2017). Researching the effectiveness of modern TEFL pedagogy on language learners’ attitudes. International Journal of Arts and Sciences., 10(2), 421–434.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoryan, T. (2018). Investigating digital native female learners attitudes towards paperless language learning. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, J. (2012). Unlock literacy with iPads. Learning and Leading with Technology. International Society for Technology in Education. U.S. and Canada, 39(8), 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S. K. (2011). Affect and acceptability: Exploring teachers’ technology-related risk Perceptions. Educational Media International, 48(4), 261–272.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, P. (2012). Examining the impact of educational technology courses on pre-service teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching Education, 23(2), 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Chuang, T. (2016). Technology-assisted sheltered instruction: Instructional streaming video in an EFL multi-purpose computer course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 618–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, C., Sun, J. C., & Yu, P. (2015). The benefits of a challenge: Student motivation and flow experience in tablet-PC-game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments. Published online. Taylor & Francis, 23(2), 172–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2010). Educational technology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jukes, I., McCain, T., & Crockett, L. (2010). Understanding the digital generation. Canada: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2014). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: The effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, G. B. (1968). Education and ecstasy. New York: Delacorte Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2014). Investigating learner attitudes toward e-books as learning tools: Based on the activity theory approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 10(9), 10–80.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. (2012). Teacher professional development for technology integration in a primary school learning community. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meder, A. M., & Wegner, J. R. (2015). iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: A survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(1), 27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlinger, H. D., & Powers, S. M. (2002). Technology and teacher education: A guide for educators and policymakers. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, D., Akman, I., & Mishra, A. (2014). Theory of reasoned action application for green information technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 36(1), 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants (Vol. 9, pp. 1–6). Bingley: NCB University Press. (5).
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, K. F. (2011). Introduction to social research. Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rasku-Puttonen, H., Etelapelto, A., Hakkinen, P., & Arvaja, M. (2006). Teachers’ instructional scaffolding in an innovative information and communication technology-based history learning environment. Teacher Development: an International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 6(2), 269–287.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2005). Real world research. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., Radford, L., & LaCroix, L. (2012). Working with cultural-historical activity theory. Qualitative Social Research, 13(2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. L., & Schneiderheinze, A. (2005). Understanding innovation in education using activity theory. Educational Technology and Society, 8(1), 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saudelli, M. G., & Ciampa, K. (2014). Exploring the role of TPACK and teacher self-efficacy: An ethnographic case study of three iPad language arts classes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 285–418. Taylor & Frances.
   Google Scholar
• Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerich, A., Ward, R., Sikdar, K., Payne, J., & Herman, L. (2007). A survey of high school students with ubiquitous access to tablet PCs. Ergonomics, 50(5), 706–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stols, G. (2013). The use of a tablet PC for instruction: A theoretical framework. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M. (2013). Comparison of selected e-books and equivalent print books: Have handheld portable devices increased use in three aggregated resources? Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 10(1), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2009). The impact of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on pre-service teachers’ attitude toward computer use: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 89–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. (2011). Deconstructing digital natives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Troudi, S., & Alwan, F. (2010). Teachers’ feelings during curriculum change in the UAE: Opening Pandora’s box. Teacher Development: an International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(1), 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M., Chen, K., & Chien, J. (2012). The factors impact of knowledge sharing intentions: The theory of reasoned action perspective. Qual Quant, 41(1), 1479–1491. United Arab Emirates Ministry of Education (2016): http://ws2.mohesr.ae/
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, S. (2011). Should schools go paperless? Learning and Leading with Technology, 38(5), 6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, E. A., & Baum, M. (2011). Will the iPad revolutionize education? Learning and Leading with Technology. International Society for Technology in Education. U.S. and Canada, 38(7), 6-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. (2005). Research methods in education: An introduction. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar