2,649
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

‘What works’ depends: teacher accountability policy and sociocultural context in international large-scale surveys

ORCID Icon
Pages 474-499 | Received 19 Apr 2021, Accepted 18 Nov 2021, Published online: 20 Dec 2021

References

  • Abelmann, Charles, and Richard F. Elmore. 1999. “When Accountability Knocks, Will Anyone Answer?.” CPRE Research Report Series RR-42. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Accessed 19 August 2017. http://www.cpre.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/782_rr42.pdf
  • Alesina, Alberto, and Paola Giuliano. 2015. “Culture and Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 53 (4): 898–944. doi:10.1257/jel.53.4.898.
  • Altrichter, H., and D. Kemethofer. 2015. “Does Accountability Pressure through School Inspections Promote School Improvement?.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (1): 32–56. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.927369.
  • Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey. 2014. Rethinking Value-Added Models in Education: Critical Perspectives on Tests and Assessment-Based Accountability. New York; London: Routledge.
  • Andrews, Matt, Lant Pritchett, and Michael Woolcock. 2017. Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bates, Mary Ann, and Rachel Glennerster. 2017. “The Generalizability Puzzle (SSIR).” Stanford Social Innovation Review Summer. Accessed 3 December 2018. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_generalizability_puzzle
  • Bell, Andrew, and Kelvyn Jones. 2015. “Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data.” Political Science Research and Methods 3 (1): 133–153. doi:10.1017/psrm.2014.7.
  • Benoliel, Pascale, and Izhak Berkovich. 2018. “A Cross-National Examination of the Effect of the Schwartz Cultural Dimensions on PISA Performance Assessments.” Social Indicators Research 139 (2): 825–845. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1732-z.
  • Benveniste, Guy. 1985. “The Design of School Accountability Systems.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 7 (3): 261–279. doi:10.3102/01623737007003261.
  • Bergbauer, Annika B, Eric A Hanushek, and Ludger Woessmann. 2018. “Testing.” NBER Working Paper 24836. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w24836.
  • Booher-Jennings, Jennifer. 2005. “Below the Bubble: “Educational Triage” and the Texas Accountability System.” American Educational Research Journal 42 (2): 231–268. doi:10.3102/00028312042002231.
  • Bovens, Mark. 2007. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Journal 13 (4): 447–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.
  • Broadfoot, Patricia, and Marilyn Osborn. 1993. Perceptions of Teaching: Primary School Teachers in England and France. Cassell Education. London; New York: Cassell.
  • Broekman, Art. 2016. “The Effects of Accountability: A Case Study from Indonesia.” In Flip the System: Changing Education from the Ground Up, edited by Jelmer Evers and René Kneyber, 72–96. Oxford, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315678573.
  • Bryk, Anthony S., and Barbara Schneider. 2002. Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Cambridge Assessment. 2017. “A Cambridge Approach to Improving Education” Cambridge, United Kingdom: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. Accessed 21 December 2018. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/cambridge-approach-to-improving-education.pdf
  • Cartwright, Nancy, and Jeremy Hardie. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Accessed 9 November 2018. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199841608.001.0001
  • Cerna, Lucie. 2014. “Trust: What It Is and Why It Matters for Governance and Education” OECD Education Working Papers. Accessed 16 November 2016. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/5jxswcg0t6wl-en
  • Chiu, Ming Ming, and Robert M. Klassen. 2010. “Relations of Mathematics Self-Concept and Its Calibration with Mathematics Achievement: Cultural Differences among Fifteen-Year-Olds in 34 Countries.” Learning and Instruction 20 (1): 2–17. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.002.
  • Coco, Giuseppe, and Raffaele Lagravinese. 2014. “Cronyism and Education Performance.” Economic Modelling 38 (Supplement C): 443–450. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.027.
  • Coffield, Frank. 2012. “Why the McKinsey Reports Will Not Improve School Systems.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (1): 131–149. doi:10.1080/02680939.2011.623243.
  • Cohn, Alain, Michel André Maréchal, David Tannenbaum, and Christian Lukas Zünd. 2019. “Civic Honesty around the Globe.” Science June: eaau8712. doi:10.1126/science.aau8712.
  • Condron, Dennis J. 2011. “Egalitarianism and Educational Excellence Compatible Goals for Affluent Societies?.” Educational Researcher 40 (2): 47–55. doi:10.3102/0013189X11401021.
  • Czerniawski, G. 2011. “Emerging Teachers-Emerging Identities: Trust and Accountability in the Construction of Newly Qualified Teachers in Norway, Germany, and England.” European Journal of Teacher Education 34 (4): 431–447. doi:10.1080/02619768.2011.587114.
  • De Philippis, Marta, and Federico Rossi. 2021. “Parents, Schools and Human Capital Differences across Countries.” Journal of the European Economic Association 19 (2): 1364–1406. doi:10.1093/jeea/jvaa036.
  • Diamond, John B., and James P. Spillane. 2004. “High-Stakes Accountability in Urban Elementary Schools: Challenging or Reproducing Inequality.” Teachers College Record 106 (6): 1145–1176. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00375.x.
  • EVS. 2011. “European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008).” ZA4800 Data file version 3.0.0. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. doi:10.4232/1.11004.
  • EVS. 2015. “Integrated Values Surveys 1981-2014” European Values Study. Accessed 5 March 2015 2017. http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu
  • EVS. 2016. “EVS 2008 Method Report.” GESIS Papers 2016/18. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
  • Feenstra, Robert C., Robert Inklaar, and Marcel P. Timmer. 2016. “Penn World Table 9.0.” Groningen Growth and Development Centre. doi:10.15141/S5J01T.
  • Feniger, Yariv, and Adam Lefstein. 2014. “How Not to Reason with PISA Data: An Ironic Investigation.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (6): 845–855. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.892156.
  • Fischman, Gustavo E., Amelia Marcetti Topper, Iveta Silova, Janna Goebel, and Jessica L. Holloway. 2019. “Examining the Influence of International Large-Scale Assessments on National Education Policies.” Journal of Education Policy 34 (4): 470–499. doi:10.1080/02680939.2018.1460493.
  • Fryer, Roland G, and Steven D Levitt. 2010. “An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in Mathematics.” American Economic Journal. Applied Economics 2 (2): 210–240. doi:10.1257/app.2.2.210.
  • Gelfand, Michele J., Beng-Chong Lim, and Jana L. Raver. 2004. “Culture and Accountability in Organizations: Variations in Forms of Social Control across Cultures.” Human Resource Management Review 14 (1): 135–160. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.007.
  • Green, Andy, Jan Germen Janmaat, and Christine Han. 2009. “Regimes of Social Cohesion” LLAKES Research Paper 1. London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. Accessed 16 August 2019. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/10486/1/Z.-Regimes-of-Social-Cohesion.pdf
  • Guiso, Luigi, Ferdinando Monte, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales. 2008. “Culture, Gender, and Math.” Science 320 (5880): 1164–1165. doi:10.1126/science.1154094.
  • Han, Seong Won, Francesca Borgonovi, and Sonia Guerriero. 2018. “What Motivates High School Students to Want to Be Teachers? The Role of Salary, Working Conditions, and Societal Evaluations about Occupations in a Comparative Perspective.” American Educational Research Journal 55 (1): 3–39. doi:10.3102/0002831217729875.
  • Hanushek, Eric A., and Ludger Woessmann. 2011. “The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, and Ludger Woessmann, 89–200. Vol. 3. San Diego: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00002-8.
  • Hanushek, Eric A., and Steven G. Rivkin. 2006. “Chapter 18 Teacher Quality.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 2. edited by E. Hanushek, and F. Welch, 1051–1078. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02018-6.
  • Hanushek, Eric A., Susanne Link, and Ludger Woessmann. 2013. “Does School Autonomy Make Sense Everywhere? Panel Estimates from PISA.” Journal of Development Economics 104 (September): 212–232. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002.
  • Hanushek, Eric A. 2019. “Testing, Accountability, and the American Economy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 683 (1): 110–128. doi:10.1177/0002716219841299.
  • Hanushek, Eric A, Lavinia Kinne, Philipp Lergetporer, and Ludger Woessmann. 2020. “Culture and Student Achievement: The Intertwined Roles of Patience and Risk-Taking.” Working Paper 27484. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w27484.
  • He, Jia, Fons J. R. van de Vijver, and Alena Kulikova. 2017. “Country-Level Correlates of Educational Achievement: Evidence from Large-Scale Surveys.” Educational Research and Evaluation 23 (5–6): 163–179. doi:10.1080/13803611.2017.1455288.
  • Heller-Sahlgren, Gabriel. 2018. “Smart but Unhappy: Independent-School Competition and the Wellbeing-Efficiency Trade-off in Education.” Economics of Education Review 62 (February): 66–81. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.10.005.
  • Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Holloway, Jessica, and Jory Brass. 2018. “Making Accountable Teachers: The Terrors and Pleasures of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (3): 361–382. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636.
  • Honig, Dan, and Lant Pritchett. 2019. “The Limits of Accounting-Based Accountability in Education (And Far Beyond): Why More Accounting Will Rarely Solve Accountability Problems.” Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE). doi:10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2019/030.
  • Hopmann, S.T. 2008. “No Child, No School, No State Left Behind: Schooling in the Age of Accountability.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 40 (4): 417–456. doi:10.1080/00220270801989818.
  • Hwa, Yue-Yi. 2019. “Teacher Accountability Policy and Sociocultural Context: A Cross-Country Study Focusing on Finland and Singapore.” Doctoral thesis., University of Cambridge. doi:10.17863/CAM.55349.
  • Hwa, Yue-Yi. 2021. “Contrasting Approaches, Comparable Efficacy? How Macro-Level Trust Influences Teacher Accountability in Finland and Singapore.” In Trust, Accountability and Capacity in Education System Reform: Global Perspectives in Comparative Education, edited by Melanie Ehren and Jacqueline Baxter, 222–251. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429344855-11.
  • Ingersoll, Richard M., Lisa Merrill, and Henry May. 2016. “Do Accountability Policies Push Teachers Out?.” Educational Leadership 73 (8): 44–49.
  • Inglehart, Ronald, C., Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin, and B. Puranen, eds. 2014a. World Values Survey: Round Five - Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp Accessed 28 November 2018.
  • Inglehart, Ronald, C., Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin, and B. Puranen, eds. 2014b. World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp Accessed 28 November 2018
  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iyengar, Radhika. 2012. “Social Capital as the Catalyst for School Participation.” Compare 42 (6): 839–862. doi:10.1080/03057925.2012.657930.
  • Jerrim, John. 2015. “Why Do East Asian Children Perform so Well in PISA? An Investigation of Western-Born Children of East Asian Descent.” Oxford Review of Education 41 (3): 310–333. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1028525.
  • Jerrim, John, Luis Alejandro Lopez-Agudo, Oscar D. Marcenaro-Gutierrez, and Nikki Shure. 2017. “What Happens When Econometrics and Psychometrics Collide? An Example Using the PISA Data.” Economics of Education Review 61 (December): 51–58. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.09.007.
  • Kim, Dae Jung. 1994. “Is Culture Destiny? The Myth of Asia’s Anti-Democratic Values.” Foreign Affairs 1 (November): 1994. Accessed 22 August 2017. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/southeast-asia/1994-11-01/culture-destiny-myth-asias-anti-democratic-values
  • Koppell, Jonathan GS. 2005. “Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder”.” Public Administration Review 65 (1): 94–108. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x.
  • Laukaityte, Inga, and Marie Wiberg. 2017. “Using Plausible Values in Secondary Analysis in Large-Scale Assessments.” Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 46 (22): 11341–11357. doi:10.1080/03610926.2016.1267764.
  • Liew, Warren Mark. 2012. “Perform or Else: The Performative Enhancement of Teacher Professionalism.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 32 (3): 285–303. doi:10.1080/02188791.2012.711297.
  • Markus, Hazel Rose, and Alana Conner. 2013. Clash! How to Thrive in a Multicultural World. New York: Penguin Publishing Group.
  • Markus, Hazel Rose, and Shinobu Kitayama. 2010. “Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (4): 420–430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557.
  • Martin, Michael O., Ina V.S. Mullis, and Ian Hooper, eds. 2016. Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015. Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Martin, Michael O., Ina V.S. Mullis, Pierre Foy, and Martin Hooper. 2016. TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill. Massachusetts: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Maxwell, Joseph A. 2012. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  • Mbiti, Isaac, Karthik Muralidharan, Mauricio Romero, Youdi Schipper, Constantine Manda, and Rakesh Rajani. 2019. “Inputs, Incentives, and Complementarities in Education: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134 (3): 1627–1673. doi:10.1093/qje/qjz010.
  • McDonnell, Lorraine M., and Richard F. Elmore. 1987. “Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instruments.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 (2): 133–152. doi:10.3102/01623737009002133.
  • McLaughlin, Milbrey Wallin. 1987. “Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 (2): 171–178. doi:10.3102/01623737009002171.
  • Meyer, Heinz-Dieter, and Kathryn Schiller. 2013. “Gauging the Role of Non-Educational Effects in Large-Scale Assessments: Socio-Economics, Culture and PISA Outcomes.” In PISA, Power, and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance, edited by Heinz-Dieter Meyer and Aaron Benavot, 207–224. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Mizel, O. 2009. “Accountability in Arab Bedouin Schools in Israel: Accountable to Whom?.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 37 (5): 624–644. doi:10.1177/1741143209339654.
  • Monaghan, Christine, and Elisabeth King. 2018. “How Theories of Change Can Improve Education Programming and Evaluation in Conflict-Affected Contexts.” Comparative Education Review 62 (3): 365–384. doi:10.1086/698405.
  • Mourshed, Mona, Marc Krawitz, and Emma Dorn. 2017. How to Improve Student Educational Outcomes: New Insights from Data Analytics. Discussion paper. McKinsey & Company. Accessed 3 December 2018. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Social%20Sector/Our%20Insights/How%20to%20improve%20student%20educational%20outcomes/How-to-improve-student-educational-outcomes-New-insights-from-data-analytics.ashx
  • Müller, J., and F. Hernández. 2010. “On the Geography of Accountability: Comparative Analysis of Teachers’ Experiences across Seven European Countries.” Journal of Educational Change 11 (4): 307–322. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9126-x.
  • Muller, Jerry Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Murnane, Richard J., and Barbara R. Phillips. 1981. “Learning by Doing, Vintage, and Selection: Three Pieces of the Puzzle Relating Teaching Experience and Teaching Performance.” Economics of Education Review 1 (4): 453–465. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(81)90015-7.
  • Narwana, K. 2015. “A Global Approach to School Education and Local Reality: A Case Study of Community Participation in Haryana, India.” Policy Futures in Education 13 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1177/1478210314568242.
  • Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • OECD. 2009. PISA Data Analysis Manual: SPSS Second Edition. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. 2014a. PISA 2012 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. 2014b. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised Edition). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • OECD. 2016a. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. 2016b. “PISA 2015 Annex B1.4 Results (Tables): Governance, Assessment and Accountability.” Dataset. OECD Code. Accessed 2 September 2019. http://statlinks.oecdcode.org/982016071p1t004.xlsx
  • OECD. 2017a. PISA 2015 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. 2017b. “School Questionnaire for PISA 2018: Main Survey Version” OECD Publishing.Accessed 19 February 2021. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2018database/CY7_201710_QST_MS_SCQ_NoNotes_final.pdf
  • OECD. 2020. PISA 2018 Results (Volume V): Effective Policies, Successful Schools. PISA. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/ca768d40-en.
  • Pawson, Ray, and Nick Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - into the Age of Austerity. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Pritchett, Lant, and Martina Viarengo. 2021. “Learning Outcomes in Developing Countries: Four Hard Lessons from PISA-D.” RISE Working Paper. 21/069: Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE). doi:10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2021/069.
  • Rizvi, Fazal, and Bob Lingard. 2009. Globalizing Education Policy. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
  • Rodríguez-Planas, Núria, and Natalia Nollenberger. 2018. “Let the Girls Learn! It Is Not Only about Math … It’s about Gender Social Norms.” Economics of Education Review 62 (February): 230–253. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.11.006.
  • Romzek, Barbara S., and Melvin J. Dubnick. 1987. “Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy.” Public Administration Review 47 (3): 227–238. doi:10.2307/975901.
  • Rubin, Donald B. 1996. “Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434): 473–489. doi:10.2307/2291635.
  • Rutkowski, Leslie, Eugenio Gonzalez, Marc Joncas, and Matthias Von Davier. 2010. “International Large-Scale Assessment Data: Issues in Secondary Analysis and Reporting.” Educational Researcher 39 (2): 142–151. doi:10.3102/0013189X10363170.
  • Schleicher, Andreas. 2018. World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System Paris: OECD.
  • Sellar, Sam, and Bob Lingard. 2013. “The OECD and Global Governance in Education.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 710–725. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.779791.
  • Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1999. “Democracy as a Universal Value.” Journal of Democracy 10 (3): 3–17. doi:10.1353/jod.1999.0055.
  • Spillane, James P. 2009. Standards Deviation: How Schools Misunderstand Education Policy. Cambridge. Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press.
  • Steiner-Khamsi, Gita. 2014. “Cross-National Policy Borrowing: Understanding Reception and Translation.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 34 (2): 153–167. doi:10.1080/02188791.2013.875649.
  • Stout, Lynn. 2010. Cultivating Conscience: How Good Laws Make Good People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Survey Research Center. 2016. Guidelines for Best Practice in Cross-Cultural Surveys. 4th ed. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
  • Taras, Vas, Bradley L. Kirkman, and Piers Steel. 2010. “Examining the Impact of Culture’s Consequences: A Three-Decade, Multilevel, Meta-Analytic Review of Hofstede’s Cultural Value Dimensions.” Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (3): 405–439. doi:10.1037/a0018938.
  • Thiel, Corrie, Sebastian Schweizer, and Johannes Bellmann. 2017. “Rethinking Side Effects of Accountability in Education: Insights from a Multiple Methods Study in Four German School Systems.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25 (August): 93. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2662.
  • Thompson, Michael, Richard Ellis, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
  • Tulowitzki, Pierre.2016. “Educational Accountability around the Globe: Challenges and Possibilities for School Leadership.” In Educational Accountability: International Perspectives on Challenges and Possibilities for School Leadership, edited by Jacob II Easley, and Pierre Tulowitzki. London; New York: Routledge 233–238 .
  • UNESCO. 2017. Global Education Monitoring Report 2017/2018: Accountability in Education – Meeting Our Commitments. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Velayutham, S., and M. H. B. Perera. 2004. “The Influence of Emotions and Culture on Accountability and Governance.” Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 4 (1): 52–64. doi:10.1108/14720700410521961.
  • Verger, Antoni, and Lluís Parcerisa.2017. “A Difficult Relationship. Accountability Policies and Teachers: International Evidence and Key Premises for Future Research Akiba, Motoko, and LeTendre, Gerald K. eds. ” In International Handbook of Teacher Quality and Policy, 241–254. New York: Routledge. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1256602.
  • Von der Embse, Nathaniel P., Laura L. Pendergast, Natasha Segool, Elina Saeki, and Shannon Ryan. 2016. “The Influence of Test-Based Accountability Policies on School Climate and Teacher Stress across Four States.” Teaching and Teacher Education 59 (October): 492–502. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.013.
  • Wagemaker, Hans. 2010. “IEA: Globalization and Assessment”. In International Encyclopedia of Education (Oxford: Academic Press), edited by Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker, and Barry McGaw, 663–668.doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01477-9.
  • Wagner, Robert B. 1989. Accountability in Education: A Philosophical Inquiry. New York: Routledge.
  • Webber, D.J. 2010. “School District Democracy: School Board Voting and School Performance.” Politics and Policy 38 (1): 81–95. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00229.x.
  • West, Martin R., and Ludger Woessmann. 2010. ““Every Catholic Child in a Catholic School”: Historical Resistance to State Schooling, Contemporary Private Competition and Student Achievement across Countries.” The Economic Journal 120 (546): F229–55. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02375.x.
  • Williams, Martin J. 2020. “External Validity and Policy Adaptation: From Impact Evaluation to Policy Design.” The World Bank Research Observer 35 (2): 158–191. doi:10.1093/wbro/lky010.
  • Woessmann, Ludger. 2016. “The Importance of School Systems: Evidence from International Differences in Student Achievement.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3): 3–32. doi:10.1257/jep.30.3.3.
  • Woessmann, Ludger, Elke Luedemann, Gabriela Schuetz, and Martin R. West. 2009. School Accountability, Autonomy and Choice around the World. Cheltenham; Northhampton: Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing .
  • WVS Association. n.d. “WVS Database: Fieldwork and Sampling” Official web site. World Values Survey. Accessed 11 August 2017. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
  • You, Yun. 2017. “Comparing School Accountability in England and Its East Asian Sources of “Borrowing”.” Comparative Education 53 (2): 224–244. doi:10.1080/03050068.2017.1294652.
  • Zhao, Yong. 2018. What Works May Hurt: Side Effects in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.