2,070
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Resolving dilemmas: Swedish special educators and subject teachers’ perspectives on their enactment of inclusive education

ORCID Icon
Pages 303-320 | Received 04 Oct 2022, Accepted 20 Apr 2023, Published online: 04 May 2023

References

  • Ainscow, M., T. Booth, and A. Dyson. 2006. “Inclusion and the Standards Agenda: Negotiating Policy Pressures in England.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 10 (4–5): 295–308. doi:10.1080/13603110500430633.
  • Ainscow, M., R. Slee, and M. Best. 2019. “Editorial: The Salamanca Statement: 25 Years on.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (7–8): 671–676. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1622800.
  • Amor, A. M., M. Hagiwara, K. A. Shogren, J. R. Thompson, M. Á. Verdugo, K. M. Burke, and V. Aguayo. 2018. “International Perspectives and Trends in Research on Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (12): 1277–1295. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1445304.
  • Artiles, A. J., Elizabeth B. Kozleski, S. Dorn, and C. Christensen. 2006. “Learning in Inclusive Education Research: Re-Mediating Theory and Methods with a Transformative Agenda.” Review of Research in Education 30 (30): 65–108. doi:10.3102/0091732X030001065.
  • Ball, S.J., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2012. How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. London: Routledge.
  • Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, A. Braun, and K. Hoskins. 2011a. “Policy Actors: Doing Policy Work in Schools.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32 (4): 625–639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565.
  • Ball, S.J., M. Maguire, A. Braun, and K. Hoskins. 2011b. “Policy Subjects and Policy Actors in Schools: Some Necessary but Insufficient Analyses.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32 (4): 611–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601564.
  • Barow, T., and D. Östlund. 2018. “The Significance of SEN Assessment, Diagnoses and Psychometric Tests in Inclusive Education: Studies from Sweden and Germany.” In Testing and Inclusive Schooling. International Challenges and Opportunities, edited by B. Hamre, A. Morin, and C. Ydesen, 231–247. London: Routledge.
  • Berlak, A., and H. Berlak. 1981. Dilemmas of Schooling : Teaching and Social Change. London: Methuen.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Clark, C., A. Dyson, and A. Millward. 1998. “Theorising Special Education: Time to Move On?” In Theorising Special Education, edited by C. Clark, A. Dyson, and A. Millward, 156–173. London: Routledge.
  • Done, E. J., and M. J. Andrews. 2020. “How Inclusion Became Exclusion: Policy, Teachers and Inclusive Education.” Journal of Education Policy 35 (4): 447–464. doi:10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763.
  • Dyson, A., F. Gallannaugh, and A. Millward. 2003. “Making Space in the Standards Agenda: Developing Inclusive Practices in Schools.” European Educational Research Journal EERJ 2 (2): 228–244. doi:10.2304/eerj.2003.2.2.3.
  • Dyson, A., and A. Millward. 2000. Schools and Special Needs: Issues of Innovation and Inclusion. London: Paul Chapman.
  • Engsig, T. T., and C. J. Johnstone. 2015. “Is There Something Rotten in the State of Denmark? The Paradoxical Policies of Inclusive Education - Lessons from Denmark.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 19 (5): 469–486. doi:10.1080/13603116.2014.940068.
  • European Commission. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA Relevance). Brussels: European Commission.
  • Göransson, K., and C. Nilholm. 2014. “Conceptual Diversities and Empirical Shortcomings - a Critical Analysis of Research on Inclusive Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (3): 265–280. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.933545.
  • Hamre, B., A. Morin, and C. Ydesen. 2018. “Optimizing the Educational Subject Between Testing and Inclusion in an Era of Neoliberalism. Musings on a Research Agenda and Its Future Perspectives.” In Testing and Inclusive Schooling. International Challenges and Opportunities, edited by B. Hamre, A. Morin, and C. Ydesen, 254–261. London: Routledge.
  • Ineland, J. 2015. “Logics and Ambivalence - Professional Dilemmas During Implementation of an Inclusive Education Practice.” Education Inquiry 6 (1): 53–71. doi:10.3402/edui.v6.26157.
  • Isaksson, J., and R. Lindqvist. 2015. “What is the Meaning of Special Needs Education? Problem Representations in Swedish Policy Documents: Late 1970s-2014.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 30 (1): 122. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.964920.
  • Kelly, P. 2018. “Standardized Assessment and the Shaping of Neoliberal Student Subjectivities.” In Testing and Inclusive Schooling. International Challenges and Opportunities, edited by B. Hamre, A. Morin, and C. Ydesen, 64–78. London: Routledge.
  • Kerins, P. 2014. “Dilemmas of Difference and Educational Provision for Pupils with Mild General Learning Disabilities in the Republic of Ireland.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (1): 47–58. doi:10.1080/08856257.2013.849841.
  • Lindqvist, G., C. Nilholm, L. Almqvist, and G. Wetso. 2011. “Different Agendas? The Views of Different Occupational Groups on Special Needs Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 26 (2): 143–157. doi:10.1080/08856257.2011.563604.
  • Magnússon, G. 2019. “An Amalgam of Ideals - Images of Inclusion in the Salamanca Statement.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (7–8): 677–690. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1622805.
  • Magnússon, G. 2020. “Inclusive Education and School Choice Lessons from Sweden.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 35 (1): 25–39. doi:10.1080/08856257.2019.1603601.
  • Magnússon, G., K. Göransson, and G. Lindqvist. 2019. “Contextualizing Inclusive Education in Educational Policy: The Case of Sweden.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 5 (2): 67–77. doi:10.1080/20020317.2019.1586512.
  • Miller, P. 2018. Dilemmas and Decisions : A Critical Addition to the Curriculum. Boston: Brill Sense.
  • Minow, M. 1985. “Learning to Live with the Dilemma of Difference: Bilingual and Special Education.” Law and Contemporary Problems 48 (2): 157–211. doi:10.2307/1191571.
  • Molbaek, M. 2018. “Inclusive Teaching Strategies - Dimensions and Agendas.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (10): 1048–1061. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1414578.
  • Nilholm, C. 2005. “Specialpedagogik: Vilka Är de Grundläggande Perspektiven? [Special Education: Which are the Basic Perspectives?].” Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige 10 (2): 124–138.
  • Norwich, B. 1993. “Ideological Dilemmas in Special Needs Education: Practitioners’ Views.” Oxford Review of Education 19 (4): 527–546. doi:10.1080/0305498930190408.
  • Norwich, B. 2002. “Education, Inclusion and Individual Differences: Recognising and Resolving Dilemmas.” British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (4): 482–502. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00215.
  • Norwich, B. 2008. “Dilemmas of Difference, Inclusion and Disability: International Perspectives on Placement.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 23 (4): 287–304. doi:10.1080/08856250802387166.
  • OECD. 2018. Equity in Education: Breaking Down Barriers to Social Mobility, PISA. OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264073234-en.
  • Sandström, M., N. Klang, and G. Lindqvist. 2019. “Bureaucracies in Schools-Approaches to Support Measures in Swedish Schools Seen in the Light of Skrtic’s Theories.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 63 (1): 89–104. doi:10.1080/00313831.2017.1324905.
  • SFS. 2003. Concerning the Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans. Vol. 460. Stockholm: Swedish Code of Statutes.
  • SFS. 2007. Statute of Postgraduate Diploma in Special Education Needs. Vol. 638. Stockholm: Swedish Code of Statutes.
  • SFS. 2010. Education Act, 800. Stockholm: Swedish Code of Statutes.
  • Shieh, E. 2022. “How Teachers See Policy: School Context, Teacher Inquiry, and Policy Visibility.” Journal of Education Policy, Ahead-Of-Print(ahead-Of-Print) 38 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/02680939.2021.1959650.
  • Slee, R. 2001. ““Inclusion in Practice”: Does Practice Make Perfect?: Special Issue: Inclusion in Practice.” Educational Review (Birmingham) 53 (2): 113–123. doi:10.1080/00131910120055543.
  • Slee, R. 2019. “Belonging in an Age of Exclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (9): 909–922. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1602366.
  • Smith, W. C. 2018. “Quality and Inclusion in the SDGs: Tension in Principle and Practice.” In Testing and Inclusive Schooling. International Challenges and Opportunities, edited by B. Hamre, A. Morin, and C. Ydesen, 89–104. London: Routledge.
  • Swedish National Agency for Education. (2022). Arbete med extra anpassningar, särskilt stöd och åtgärdsprogram. [Work with extra adapations, special support, and action plans.]. Retrieved September 8, 2022, from https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=10021
  • Swedish Research Council. 2002. Forskningsetiska Principer Inom Humanistisk-Samhällsvetenskaplig Forskning [Research Ethics Principles in Humanities-Social Science Research]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
  • Swedish Research Council. 2017. God forskningssed, Good research practice. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
  • Tetler, S. 1998. “Group Inclusion as a Stepping Stone to Full Inclusion.” International Journal of Educational Research 29 (2): 131–141. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00019-6.