The Effects of Oral and Silent Reading on Reading Comprehension

References

• Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (2010). Why so much oral reading? In E. H. Hiebert & D. R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers (pp. 45–56). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children's comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29, 137–164. doi:10.1080/02702710801963951.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. S. (2008). Reading assessment: A primer for teachers and coaches (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. S. (2014). Reading assessment: A primer for teachers in the Common Core era (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, L. (1938). The improvement of reading. New York, NY: Farrar and Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Krauss, L. (1996). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Purcell-Gates, V. (2003). Genres at home and at school: Bridging the known to the new. Reading Teacher, 57(1), 30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Roberts, K. M. (2010). The genre-specific nature of reading comprehension. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 74–86). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrich, J. F. (2006). Vygotskyan inner speech and the reading process. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6, 12–25. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2389&context=edupapers
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Maxwell, L. (1988). Interactive effects of reading mode, production format, and structural importance of text among LD pupils. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(2), 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp.82–98). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, A. D., Hawkins, R. O., Sheeley, W., Reynolds, J. R., Jenkins, S., Schmitt, A. J., & Martin, D. A. (2011). An investigation of silent versus aloud reading comprehension of elementary students using maze assessment procedures. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 4–13. doi:10.1002/pits.20543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, A. D., Skinner, C. H., Williams, J., Hawkins, R., Neddenriep, C. E., & Dizer, J. (2007). Comparing comprehension following silent and aloud reading across elementary and secondary students: implication for curriculum-based measurement. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(1), 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., Samuels, S. J., & Rasinski, T. (2012). Comprehension-based silent reading rates: What do we know? What do we need to know? Literacy Research and Instruction, 51, 110–124. doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.531887.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Lockhart, A. V. (1919). A study of oral and silent reading in the elementary schools of Evanston. School and Society, 10(225), 587–590.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, C., & Holmes, B. (1981). Oral and silent reading of sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(4), 545–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Wagner, R., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragler, S. (1995). The transition from oral to silent reading. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 16, 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, L. L., & Caldwell, J. A. (2009). Formal and informal measures of reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 403–427). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L. L., & Caldwell, J. A. (2011). Qualitative reading inventory-5. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. (1979). Reading silently and aloud. In A. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development (pp. 169–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000a). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K. & Dreyer, L. G. (2000b). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.): Manual for scoring and interpretation, levels 4-6. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Maloch, B., & Bomer, R. (2013). Informational texts and the Common Core Standards: What are we talking about, anyway? Language Arts, 90(3), 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Marinak, B., & Gambrell, L. B. (2008). Elementary informational text instruction: A research review. The International Journal of Learning, 15(9), 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, R. S., Sharp, S., Bell, S. M., & George, T. (2004). Silent versus oral reading comprehension and efficiency. Psychology in the Schools, 41(2), 241–246. doi:10.1002/pits.10152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2009). Assessment for reading instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., & Ray, M. N. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 127–152.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. P. (1985). Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 341–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. P. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(2), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S, Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA's study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2011). The nation's report card: Findings in brief reading and mathematics 2011 (NCES 2012-459). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects: Appendix A: Research supporting key elements of the standards and glossary of terms. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Carpenter, R. D., Paris, A. H., & Hamilton, E. E. (2005). Spurious and genuine correlates of children's reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 131–160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Primor, L., Pierce, M. E., & Katzir, T. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts among Hebrew-speaking readers with and without a reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 6 (2), 242–268. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0059-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, S. M., Fenwick, K. D., Saunders, K. S., Ouellette, R., O'Quinn, C., & Harvey, S. (2011). Comprehension after oral and silent reading: Does grade level matter? Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, S. M., & Welling, K. A. (2001). “Read in your head”: A Vygotskian analysis of the transition from oral to silent reading. Reading Psychology, 22, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rack, J., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. & Wightman, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children learning to read words: The direct-mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 42–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350–361.
   Google Scholar
• Rowell, E. H. (1976). Do elementary students read better orally or silently? The Reading Teacher, 29(4), 367–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulties of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative texts. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Stenner, A. J., Horabin, I., & Smith, M. (1989). The Lexile scale in theory and practice: Final report. Washington, DC: MetaMetrics (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED307577).
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov, A. N. (1972). Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R. (1996). The emergence of narrative understanding: Evidence for rapid learning in personally relevant contexts. Issues in Education, 2, 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930)
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C. R., Sahlen, B., & Nettlebladt, U. (1999). What's the story? Narration and comprehension in Swedish children with language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 15, 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. A. III, & Kintch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), The handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 230–245). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Sociocognitive processes in guided silent reading: A microanalysis of small-group lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 710–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3), 129–144. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1203_2
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test-revised. Circle Plains, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, G., Sherman, R., & Jones, T. B. (2004). Are silent reading behaviors of first graders really silent? The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 546–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar