Memory for Textual Conflicts Predicts Sourcing When Adolescents Read Multiple Expository Texts

References

• Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1984). Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency and type of standard. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Zimlin, L. (1989). Instructional effects on children's use of two levels of standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 340–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Ka'adan, I. (2016). Learning to integrate divergent information sources: The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Metacognition and Learning. doi:10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., Tzadok, E., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts: Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation. Instructional Science, 43, 737–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björnsson, C. H. (1968). Läsbarhet [Readability]. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2016). The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Submitted manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students' evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 180–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Rouet, J. F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M.A. (2012). Readers' use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40, 450–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., Brandmo, C., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30, 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Braasch, J. L. G. (in press). Key issues in research on students' critical reading and learning in the 21st century information society. In C. Ng & B. Bartlett (Eds.), Improving reading in the 21st century: International research and innovations. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Braasch, J. L. G., & Salmerón, L. (2016). Reading multiple and non-traditional texts: New opportunities and new challenges. Submitted manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Stadtler, M., & Salmerón, L. (in press). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In M. F. Schober, M. A. Britt, & D. N. Rapp (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Andreassen, R. (2016). Sourcing in professional education: Do text factors make any difference? Reading and Writing, 29, 1599–1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Britt, M.A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Braasch, J. L. G. (2013). Documents as entities: Extending the situation model theory of comprehension. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman, & J. F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to multiple texts (pp. 160–179). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• de Pereyra, G., Belkadi, S., Marbach, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2014, August). Do teenage readers use source information when faced with discrepant information? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, D. P., & Sutton, S. (2010). Reactivity of measurement in health psychology: How much of a problem is it? British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 453–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R., & Kraus, C. (1981–82). Good and poor comprehender differences in knowing and regulating reading behaviors. Education Research Quarterly, 6, 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska. K. M. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 356–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C.,…Project READI (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51, 219–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2014). Quellenbewertungen und Quellenverweise beim Lesen und Zusammenfassen wissenschaftsbezogener Informationen aus multiplen Webseiten [Source evaluations and source references when reading and summarizing science-related information from multiple web pages]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 42, 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., Kalbfell, E., & Gerjets, P. (2016). Is this information source commercially biased? How contradictions between web pages stimulate the consideration of source information. Discourse Processes, 53, 430–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., Meier, N., & Stahl, E. (2016). Fostering secondary-school students' intertext model formation when reading a set of websites: The effectiveness of source prompts. Computers & Education, 102, 52–64. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Keck, D., Kammerer, Y., & Starauschek, E. (2015). Reading science texts online: Does source information influence the identification of contradictions within texts? Computers & Education, 82, 442–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaernslie, M., Lie, S., Olsen, R. V., & Turmo, A. (2004). Rett spor eller ville veier [Right track or off road]? Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• List, A., Alexander, P. A., & Stephens, L. A. (in press). Trust but verify: Examining the association between students' sourcing behaviors and ratings of text trustworthiness. Discourse Processes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Junyent, A. A., & Tornatora, M. C. (2014). Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web-source information on controversial science-related topics: Effects of a short-term instructional intervention. Computers & Education, 76, 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moan, J., Baturaite, Z., Juzeniene, A., & Porojnicu, A. C. (2012). Vitamin D, sun, sunbeds and health. Public Health Nutrition, 15, 711–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Cancer Association. (2009). The adolescent study: Sunbed. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Cancer Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, P., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F. (2006). The skills of document use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Le Bigot, L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers' attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing, 29, 1549–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Rouet, J. F. (2016). Multiple viewpoints increase students' attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2404–2419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., Greene, J. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). Understanding and promoting thinking about knowledge: Origins, issues, and future directions of research on epistemic cognition. Review of Research in Education, 40, 457–496. doi:10.3102/0091732X16669319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saux, G., Britt, A., Le Bigot, L., Vibert, N., Burin, D., & Rouet, J. F. (2017). Conflicting but close: Readers' integration of information sources as a function of their disagreement. Memory and Cognition, 45, 151–157. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0644-5
   Google Scholar
• Scharrer, L., & Salmerón, L. (2016). Sourcing in the reading process: Introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing, 29, 1539–1548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Bromme, R. (2013). Dealing with uncertainty: Readers' memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as a function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 130–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Skodzik, T., & Bromme, R. (2014). Comprehending multiple documents on scientific controversies: Effects of reading goals and signaling rhetorical relationships. Discourse Processes, 51, 93–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2014) Students' sourcing while reading and writing from multiple web documents. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9, 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 18, 513–527.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 176–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Stenseth, T. (2016). The role of students' prior topic beliefs in recall and evaluation of information from texts on socio-scientific issues. Nordic Psychology. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2016.1198270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25, 1665–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerick, J. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Association Journal, 46, 1060–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar