The Differential Impact of Video-Stimulated Recall and Concurrent Questioning Methods on Beginning Readers' Verbalization About Self-Monitoring During Oral Reading

References

• Afflerbach, P., & Johnston, P. (1984). Research methodology on the use of verbal reports in reading research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 6(4), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., Kim, J., Crassas, M. E., & Doyle, B. (2013). Reading: What else matters besides strategies and skills? The Reading Teacher, 66(6), 440–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, D. P., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading strategies and skills. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R. (2012). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based reading programs. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Annevirta, T., & Vauras, M. (2006). Developmental changes of metacognitive skill in elementary school children. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3), 197–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2005). Developmental differences in metacognition: Implications for metacognitively oriented reading instruction. In S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch ( Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, and professional development (pp. 61–79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2008). Metacognitive development in reading: Contributors and consequences. In K. Mokhtari &R. Sheorey ( Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second-language learners: See how they read (pp. 25–42). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson ( Ed.) Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, A. E., & Kim, Y-S. (2016). Low-skilled adult readers look like typically developing child readers: A comparison of reading skills and eye movement behavior. Reading and Writing, 29, 1889–1914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2002). Questioning the author: Making sense of Social Studies. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 44–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, B., & Bradbury-Wolff, M. (2010). “If it's not fixed, the staples are out!” Documenting young children's perceptions of strategic reading processes. Reading Horizons, 50(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Blything, L. P., Davies, R., & Cain, K. (2015). Young children's comprehension of temporal relations in complex sentences: The influence of memory on performance. Child Development, 86(6), 1922–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 253–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, W., Lindell, A. K., & Kidd, E. (2013). Investigating the role of verbal working memory in young children's sentence comprehension. Language Learning, 63(2), 211–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenna, B. A. (1995). The metacognitive reading strategies of five early readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(1), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Brenna, B. A. (2011). An early reader two decades later: A follow-up case study on the metacognitive reading strategies of “Jan.” Literacy, 45(2), 55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer ( Eds.), The theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453–479). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, C., & Daneman, M. (2007). Compensating for a limited working memory capacity during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Psychology, 28, 163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research: An introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education, 12(2), 68–82.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. (1998). By different paths to common outcomes. York, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. B. (2014). Kindergarten bibliophiles in their own words: How they learned to read. Reading Psychology, 35(1), 80–100.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, E., Farrington-Flint, L., Underwood, J. D. M., & Stiller, J. (2012). Children's sensitivity to rime unit frequency and their early word-reading strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(4), 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2005). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Danby, S., Ewing, L., & Thorpe, K. (2011). The novice researcher: Interviewing young children. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2004). Accounting for young children's competence in educational research: New perspectives on research ethics. Australian Educational Researcher, 31(3), 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and comprehension: A meta-analysis. Pscyhonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Gog, T. (2012). Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 22, 245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destan, N., & Roebers, C. M. (2015). What are the metacognitive costs of young children's overconfidence? Metacognition Learning, 10, 347–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elosúa, M. R., García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. O., Gómez-Veiga, I., & Gil, L. (2013). Improving reading comprehension: From metacognitive intervention on strategies to the intervention on working memory executive processes. Universitas Psychologica, 12(5), 1426–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington-Flint, L. (2015). Uncovering strategy profiles in young children's reading and spelling. Learning and Individual Differences, 42(1), 64–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldon, D. F. (2007). Cognitive load and classroom teaching: The double-edged sword of automaticity. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. M. (1982). Ethnography in educational research: The dynamics of diffusion. Educational Researcher, 11(3), 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C. & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• García-Madruga, J. A., Elosúa, M. R., Gil, L., Gómez-Veiga, I., Vila, J. O., Orjales, I., … Duque, G. (2013). Reading comprehension and working memory's executive processes: An intervention study in primary school students. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 155–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M. (1996). Revaluing readers while readers revalue themselves: Retrospective Miscue Analysis. The Reading Teacher, 49(8), 600–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M. & Goodman, W. J. (2011). Eager young readers, a well-constructed text and an insightful teacher. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(20), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y., Martens, P., & Flurkey, A. (2016). Revaluing readers: Learning from Zachary. Language Arts, 93(3), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. & Owocki, G. (2002). Kidwatching: Documenting children's literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S., Green, S., Alt, M., Hogan, T., Kuo, T., Brinkley, S., & Cowan, N. (2017). The structure of working memory in young children and its relation to intelligence. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 183–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement (2nd ed). Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huey, E. B. (1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ( Originally published 1908).
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, L. & Johnson, J. (2005). Interviewing young children: Explicating our practices and dilemmas. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 821–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M. & Eveleigh, E. L. (2011). A review of the effects of self-monitoring on reading performance of students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliebo, M., Malicky, G. V., & Norman, C. (1998). Metacognition of young readers in an early intervention programme. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S., & Wagner, R. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from Grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 224–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S., Wagner, R. K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 338–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragler, S., Martin, L., & Schreier, V. (2015). Investigating young children's use of reading strategies: A longitudinal study. Reading Psychology, 36(5), 445–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. A. & Schmitt, M. C. (2014). Teacher language scaffolds the development of independent strategic reading activities and metacognitive awareness in emergent readers. Reading Psychology, 35, 32–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lijnse, P. L. (1995). “Developmental research” as a way to an empirically based “didactical structure” of science. Science Education, 79(2), 189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McTavish, M. (2008). “What were you thinking?”: The use of metacognitive strategy during engagement with narrative and informational genres. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 405–430.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. E. & Kragler, S. (2011). Becoming a self-regulated reader: A study of primary-grade students' reading strategies. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Mellard, D. F. & Fall, E. (2012). Component model of reading comprehension for adult education participants. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z. R., & Haibi, L. (2009). Elementary school children reading scientific texts: Effects of metacognitive instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 32(5), 363–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2012). Reading with meaning: Teaching comprehension in the primary grades (2nd ed). Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nutbrown, C. & Hannon, P. (2003). Children's perspectives on family literacy: Methodological issues, findings, and implications for practice. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(2), 115–145.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson ( Eds.), Handbook of reading research (2nd ed.), (pp. 609–640). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, S. M. & Urbanowski, M. (2016). Teaching early readers to self-monitor and self-correct. The Reading Teacher, 69(5), 559–567.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Belanger, N. N. (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 834–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, W. & Einarsdottir, J. (2009). Listening to young children's voices in research – changing perspectives/changing relationships. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. (2003). Metacognitive strategy knowledge: Comparison of former Reading Recovery children and their current classmates. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 7(1&2), 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. C. (2011). Using a network of strategies rubric to become a self-regulated learner. Voices from the Middle, 19(2), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. (2003). Reading comprehension and text organization. New York, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheriston, L, Critten, S., & Jones, E. (2016). Routes to reading and spelling: Testing the predictions of dual-route theory. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(4), 403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A. (2014). How the brain learns to read (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. & Howell, M. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory, and speech rate as predictors of children's reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 720–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle, A., Binder, K. S., Walsh, C. B., Nemier, C., & Bangs, K. E. (2013). Eye movements, prosody, and word frequency among average- and high-skilled second-grade readers. School Psychology Review, 42(2), 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The Think-Aloud Method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Velzen, J. (2016). Metacognitive learning: Advancing learning by developing general knowledge of the learning process. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vukovic, R. K. & Siegel, L. D. (2006). The role of working memory in specific reading comprehension difficulties. In T. P. Alloway & S. E. Gathercole ( Eds.), Working memory and neurodevelopmental disorders (pp. 89–112). New York, NY: Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, S. E. (1990). Using think aloud to assess comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 43(7), 442–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J. (2000). The interplay between automatic and control processes in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4), 554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. London: Hodder & Stoughon.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar