Adaptive Teaching During Reading Instruction: A Multi-Case Study

References

• Allen, M. H., Matthews, C. E., & Parsons, S. A. (2013). A second-grade teacher’s adaptive teaching during an integrated science-literacy unit. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L., & Johnston, P. H. (2002). Reading to learn: Lessons from exemplary fourth-grade classrooms. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf, L. C., & Lopez, M. (2012). Reading rocks: Creating a space for pre-service teachers to become responsive teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33(4), 365–381. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2012.732667
   Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. S., Belfatti, M. A., & Santori, D. M. (2008). Teaching and learning dialogically organized reading instruction. English Education, 40, 340–364.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2004). Words their way. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. doi: 10.2307/1162861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Boushey, G., & Moser, J. (2006). The daily 5: Fostering literacy independence in the elementary grades. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P. (2012). Planning and realigning a lesson in response to student contributions: Intentions and decision making. Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 25–51. doi: 10.1086/665817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. (2006). Launching the writing workshop (Grades 3–5). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Campano, G. (2007). Immigrant students and literacy: Reading, writing, and remembering. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. doi: 10.1177/003804070407700302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Initiative. (2010). English language arts standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• de Berg, K. C, & Greive, C. E. (1999). Understanding the siphon: An example of the development of pedagogical content knowledge using textbooks and the writing of early scientists. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(4), 19–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2002). Visioning and the development of outstanding teachers. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(4), 331–344. doi: 10.1080/19388070209558375
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2005). Developing metacognitive teachers: Visioning and the expert’s changing role in teacher education and professional development. In S. Israel, C. Block, K. Bauserman & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning (pp. 299–314). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G., & Hoffman, J. V. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search for a perfect method. Reading Teacher, 53, 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G., Miller, S. D., Kear, K. A., Parsons, S. A., Davis, S. G & Williams, J. B. (2008). Teachers’ instructional adaptations during literacy instruction. In Y. Kim, V. J. Risko, D. L. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, M. K., Hundley, R. T. Jimenez, … D. W. Rowe (Eds.), 57th Yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 160–171). Oak Creek, WI: NRC.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G., Miller, S. D., Parsons, S. A., & Meloth, M. (2009). Teachers as metacognitive professionals. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 240–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B. B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 161–171. doi: 10.1177/0022487109347874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Critical incidents in ELT initial teacher training. ELT Journal, 62(1), 3–10. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm072
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. B., Malloy, J. A., & Mazzoni, S. A. (2011). Evidence-based best practices for comprehensive literacy instruction. In L. B. Gambrell & L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (4th ed., pp. 11–36). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K. (2003). Learning to hope, or hoping to learn: The role of vision in the early professional lives of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 43–56. doi: 10.1177/0022487102238657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K. (2008). If you don’t know where you are going, any path will do: The role of teachers’ visions in teachers’ career paths. The New Educator, 4(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/15476880701829184
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. V., & Duffy, G. G. (2016). Does thoughtfully adaptive teaching actually exist? A challenge to teacher educators. Theory into Practice, 55(3), 172–179. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1173999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (2005). Introduction to methods in community-based participatory research for health. In B. A. Israel, E. Eng, A. Schulz & E. A. Parker (Eds.), Methods in community-based participatory research for health (pp. 3–26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L. (2016). Common Core State Standards and adaptive teaching. Theory into Practice, 55(3), 234–241. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1173991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kena, G., Musu, G. L., Robinson, J., Wang, X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., & Velez, E. D. V. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015–144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Borko, H. (2011). Mathematics professional development: Critical features for developing leadership skills and building teachers’ capacity. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. T., Chalmers, C., Chandra, V., Yeh, A., & Nason, R. (2014). Retooling Asian-Pacific teachers to promote creativity, innovation and problem solving in science classrooms. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(1), 47–64. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2013.864017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. doi: 10.1080/09500780902954273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). (PL 107-110). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: Case studies of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 149–170. doi: 10.1177/1086296X12440261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., Davis, S. G., Scales, R. Q., Williams, J. B., & Kear, K. (2010). How and why teachers adapt their literacy instruction. Mentoring Literacy Professionals: Continuing the Spirit of CRA/ALER after, 50, 221.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A, Massey, D., Vaughn, M., Scales, R., Faircloth, B. S., Howerton, W. S., Griffith, R. R., Atkinson, T. S. (2010). Developing thoughtfully adaptive teachers of reading in face to-face and online teacher education course. Journal of School Connections, 3(93), 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S.A., & Vaughn, M. (2013). Exploring adaptive teaching across contexts: Cross-case analysis of rural and urban educators’ instructional adaptations. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., Williams, B., Burrowbridge, S., & Mauk, G. (2011). The case for adaptability as an aspect of reading teacher effectiveness. Voices from the Middle, 19(1), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D. (2007). An endangered species act for literacy education. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(2), 145–162. doi: 10.1080/10862960701331878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Hoffman, J. V. (2011). Principles of practice for the teaching of reading. In T. V. Rasinski (Ed.), Rebuilding the foundation: Effective reading instruction for 21st century literacy (pp. 9–38). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Pifarre, M., & Staarman, J. K. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dialogic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 187–205. doi: 10.1007/s11412-011-9116-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poimenidou, M., & Christidou, V. (2010). Communication practices and the construction of meaning: Science activities in the kindergarten. Creative Education, 1(2), 81–92. doi: 10.4236/ce.2010.12013
   Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D. R., Child, A., Jones, C. D., & Clark, S. K. (2014). Explicit instruction in core reading programs. The Elementary School Journal, 114(3), 406–430. doi: 10.1086/674420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. E. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., Raphael, T. E., & Au, K. H. (2011). Reading and school reform. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & Afflerbach, P. P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 594–628). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2012). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Twiner, A., Littleton, K., Coffin, C., & Whitelock, D. (2014). Meaning making as an interactional accomplishment: A temporal analysis of intentionality and improvisation in classroom dialogue. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every student succeeds act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/ESSA
   Google Scholar
• Vagle, M. D. (2016). Making pedagogical adaptability less obvious. Theory into Practice, 55(3), 207–216. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1184535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M. (2013). Examining teacher agency: Why did Les leave the building? New Educator, 9(2), 119–134
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M. (2015). Adaptive teaching: Case studies of two elementary teachers’ visions and adaptations during literacy instruction. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 16(1), 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M.& Parsons, S. A. (2013). Teachers as innovators: Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning. Language Arts Journal, 91(2), 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2016). Adaptive teaching: Theoretical implications for practice [themed journal issue]. Theory Into Practice, 55(3).
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., Parsons, S.A., Gallagher, M., & Branen, J. (2016). Teachers’ adaptive instruction supporting students’ literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 69(5), 539–547.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., Parsons, S.A., Kologi, S., & Saul, M.S. (2014). Action research as a reflective tool: A multiple case study of eight rural educators’ understandings of instructional practice. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15(3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, A. (2011). The siege of the cultural city is underway: Adolescents with disabilities making art. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 53(1), 53–70. doi: 10.1080/00393541.2011.11518852
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Perry, M., Anderson, C., & Grosshandler, D. (2012). Engaging young students in scientific investigations: Prompting for meaningful reflection. Instructional Science, 40(1), 19–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (2013). Reflective teaching: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X. D. (2012). Teaching adaptability of object-oriented programming language curriculum. International Education Studies, 5(4), 237–242. doi: 10.5539/ies.v5n4p237
   Google Scholar