Enhancing Outcomes for Struggling Readers: Empirical Analysis of The Fluency Development Lesson

References

• Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2002). What I’ve learned about effective reading instruction from: a decade of studying exemplary teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 740–747. doi: 10.1177/003172170208301007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2006). Fluency: Still waiting after all these years. In S.J. Samuels & A. D. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 94–105). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R., Heisey, N., & Roller, C. (2010). Preparing reading professionals (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2008). Reading Comprehension: Strategies for Independent Learners. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., Grote-Garcia, S. (2014). What’s not… and what’s not. Reading Today, 32(2), 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5), 386–406. doi: 10.1177/00222194020350050101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J.M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., & Wichmann, A. (2002). Prosodic characteristics of skilled reading: Fluency and expressiveness in 8–10 year-old readers. Language and Speech, 45(1), 47–82. doi: 10.1177/00238309020450010301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade Students Reading Aloud: NAEP 2002 Special Study of Oral Reading (NCES 2006-469). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center of Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219–232. doi: 10.1177/001440298505200303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domby, H. (2009, December). The simple view of reading explained. United Kingdom Literacy Association. Teaching Times. Archived from the original on 2011-08-24. Retrieved from http://www.teachingtimes.com/articles/the-simple.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2006). Teaching for comprehending and fluency: Thinking, talking, and writing about reading K-8. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. L. (1982). Reliability and validity of curriculum-based informal reading inventories. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(1), 6–26. doi: 10.2307/747536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20–28. doi: 10.1177/074193258800900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1984). Word recognition. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 225–254). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi: 10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2008). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading and Quarterly, 25(1), 4–32. doi: 10.1080/10573560802491208
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Kress, R., & Pikulski, J. (1987). Informal reading inventories (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. (2013, April). Rethinking fluency: Instruction for the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Paper presented at the 58th Annual Conference of the International Reading Association, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Levy, B. A., & Rasinski, T. V. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Morris, R. D., Morrow, L. M., Woo, D. G., Meisinger, E. B., … Stahl, S. A. (2006). Teaching children to become fluent and automatic readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(4), 357–387. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 123–146. doi: 10.1080/1057356970130203
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D. B. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: What it is and why do it? In M.R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. (pp. 18–78). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. (2007). Instructing students who have literacy problems. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839–853. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 336–354. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.43.4.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming, K., & Dukes, C. (2008). Fluency: A necessary ingredient in comprehensive reading instruction in classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 4(4), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. G., & Wilcox, B. (2014). Developing literacy: Reading and writing to, with, and by children. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, G. P., Sudweeks, R. R., Morrison, T. G., & Wilcox, B. (2014). Reliability of ratings of children’s expressive reading. Reading Psychology, 35(1), 58–79. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2012.675417
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards Initiative. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/english-language-arts-standards.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T. V., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2012). Is fluent, expressive reading important for high school readers? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 67–76. doi: 10.1002/JAAL.00103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pikulski, J. J. (1990). Informal reading inventories. The Reading Teacher, 11, 514–516.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (2009). When readers struggle: Teaching that works, grades K-3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V. (1989). Fluency for everyone: Incorporating fluency in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 42(9), 690–693. doi: 10.1598/RT.63.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V., & Padak, N. D. (2005). 3-Minute reading assessments: Word recognition, fluency and comprehension. New York, NY: Scholastic Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., Linek, W. L., & Sturtevant, E. (1994). Effects of fluency development on urban second grade readers. Journal of Educational Research, 87(3), 158–165. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1994.9941237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V., Reutzel, R. Chard., & Linan-Thompson. (2011). Reading Fluency. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 286–319). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350–361. doi: 10.1080/19388070802468715
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V., & Zutell, J. B. (1996). Is fluency yet a goal of the reading curriculum? In E. G. Sturtevant and W. M. Linek (Eds.), Growing literacy: 18th yearbook of the college reading association (pp. 237–246). Harrisonburg, VA: College Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., Good, R., & Corcoran, S. (2005). Story retell: A fluency-based indicator of reading comprehension. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(3), 304–317. doi: 10.1521/scpq.2005.20.3.304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. A., Christo, C., & Shefelbine, J. A. (2011). Word recognition. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 229–258). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119–129. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Heuback, K., & Holcomb, A. (2005). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 37(1), 25–60. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, P., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular and instructional decisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Departments of Education and Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, S., & Gehsmann, K. M. (2014). Teaching reading and writing: The developmental approach. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., Smith, A., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequent validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J., & Griffith-Ross, D. (2007). How important is reading skill fluency for comprehension? The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 560–569. doi: 10.1598/RT.60.6.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonder-McDowell, C., Reutzel, D. R., & Smith, J. T. (2011). Does instructional alignment matter? Effects on struggling second graders’ reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 112(2), 259–279. doi: 10.1086/661524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zutell, J., & Rasinski, T. V. (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30(3), 211–217. doi: 10.1080/00405849109543502
   Google Scholar