Gifted Girls: Gender Bias in Gifted Referrals

REFERENCES

• Baker , D. 1986 . Gender differences in classroom interactions in secondary science . Journal of Classroom Interaction , 22 : 212 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin , A. Y. 1999 . “ Learning disability: The mysterious mask—The USA perspective ” . In The many faces of giftedness , Edited by: Baldwin , A. Y. and Vialle , W. 103 – 134 . Belmont, CA : Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar
• Berelson , B. 1952 . Content analysis in communicative research , New York, NY : Free Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bianco , M. 2005 . The effects of disability labels on special and general education teachers' referrals for gifted program . Learning Disability Quarterly , 28 ( 4 ) : 285 – 293 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco , M. and Leech , N. 2010 . Effects of teacher preparation and disability labels on gifted referrals . Teacher Education Special Education , 33 ( 4 ) : 319 – 334 .
   Google Scholar
• Callahan , C. M. 2005 . Identifying gifted students from underrepresented populations . Theory Into Practice , 44 : 98 – 104 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell , P. B. and Sanders , J. 1997 . Uniformed but interested: Findings of a national survey on gender equity in preservice teacher education . Journal of Teacher Education , 48 : 69 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin , S. A. and Moore , A. D. 2006 . Cognizance of gifted education among elementary-education professors from MCREL member states . Roeper Review , 29 : 49 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Clinkenbeard , P. R. and Kolloff , P. B. 2001 . Ten suggestions for including gifted education in preservice teacher education . The Teacher Educator , 36 : 214 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. 1988 . Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences , 2nd , Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo , N. and Davis , G.A. 2003 . Handbook of gifted education , Boston, MA : Pearson Education .
   Google Scholar
• Coleman , M.R. , Gallagher , J.J. and Foster , A. 1994 . Updated report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students , Chapel Hill, NC : University of North Carolina .
   Google Scholar
• Cooley , D. , Chauvin , J. C. and Karnes , F. A. 1984 . Gifted females: A comparison of attitudes by male and female teachers . Roeper Review , 6 : 164 – 167 .
   Google Scholar
• Croft , L. 2003 . “ Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers ” . In Handbook of gifted education , 3rd , Edited by: Colangelo , N. and Davis , G. A. 558 – 571 . Boston, MA : Pearson Education .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , G. A. and Rimm , S. B. 2004 . Education of the gifted and talented , 5th , Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Davison , J. 1996 . Meeting state mandates for gifted and talented: Iowa teacher preparation programs . Roeper Review , 19 : 41
   Google Scholar
• Donovan , M. S. and Cross , C. T. , eds. 2002 . Minority students in special and gifted education , Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fleming , P. M. 2000 . Three decades of educational progress (and continuing barriers) for women and girls . Equity & Excellence in Education , 33 ( 1 ) : 74 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Ford , D. Y. 1996 . Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs , New York, NY : Teachers College Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ford , D. Y. and Grantham , T. C. 2003 . Providing access for culturally diverse gifted students: From deficit to dynamic thinking . Theory Into Practice , 42 : 217 – 225 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford , D. Y. , Grantham , T. C. and Whiting , G. W. 2008 . Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues . Exceptional Children , 74 : 289 – 306 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox , L. and Soller , J. 2007 . “ Gender equity for gifted students ” . In Handbook for achieving gender equity through education , Edited by: Klein , S. , Kramare , C. , Richardson , B. , Fox , L. and Pollard , D. 573 – 582 . London, England : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Gagné , F. 1994 . Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's (1959) study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques . Gifted Child Quarterly , 38 : 124 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gear , G. H. 1978 . Effects of training on teachers' accuracy in the identification of gifted children . Gifted Child Quarterly , 22 : 90 – 97 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser , B. G. and Strauss , A. L. 1967 . The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research , Chicago, IL : Aldine .
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan , D. P. , Kauffman , J. M. and Pullen , P. C. 2009 . Exceptional learners , 11th , Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Opportunity Act of . 2008 . Pub. L. No. 110--315 § 201 (2008)
   Google Scholar
• Hoge , R. D. and Cudmore , L. 1986 . The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils . Teaching and Teacher Education , 2 : 181 – 196 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen , S. , VanTassel-Baska , J. and Robinson , A. 2008 . Using the national gifted education standards for university teacher preparation programs , Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kerr , B. A. 1991 . “ Educating gifted girls ” . In Handbook of gifted education , Edited by: Colangelo , N. and Davis , G. A. 402 – 415 . Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Kerr , B. A. 2000 . “ Gifted girls and young women ” . In International handbook of giftedness and talent , Edited by: Heller , K. A. , önks , F. J. M. M , Sternberg , R. J. and Subotnik , R. F. 649 – 658 . New York, NY : Elsevier Science .
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman , V. and Suranna , K. 2003 . “ Gifted and talented females ” . In Special populations in gifted education , Edited by: Castellano , J. 97 – 109 . Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Leech , N. L. and Onwuegbuzie , A. J. 2009 . A typology of mixed methods research designs . Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology , 43 : 265 – 275 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley , H. A. and Keithley , M. E. 1991 . Gender expectations and student achievement . Roeper Review , 13 : 213 – 215 .
   Google Scholar
• McBee , M. T. 2006 . A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status . Journal of Secondary Gifted Education , 17 : 103 – 111 .
   Google Scholar
• Minner , S. 1989 . Initial referral recommendations of teachers toward gifted students with behavioral problems . Roeper Review , 12 : 78 – 80 .
   Google Scholar
• Minner , S. 1990 . Teacher evaluation of case descriptions of LD gifted children . Gifted Child Quarterly , 34 : 37 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minner , S. M. , Prater , G. M. , Bloodworth , H. and Walker , S. 1987 . “ Referral and placement recommendations of teachers toward gifted handicapped children ” . In Roeper Review, 9 247 – 249 .
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Gifted Children . 2007 . State of states in gifted education , Washington, DC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Neu , T. W. and Weinfeld , R. 2007 . Helping boys succeed in school: A practical guide for parents and teachers , Waco, TX : Prufrock Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pegnato , C. W. and Birch , J. W. 1959 . Locating gifted junior high school students: A comparison of methods . Exceptional Children , 25 : 300 – 304 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson , J. S. and Margolin , L. 1997 . Naming gifted children: An example of unintended “reproduction.” . Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 21 : 83 – 100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell , T. and Siegle , D. 2000 . Teacher bias in indentifying gifted and talented students . The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter , Spring : 13 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Reis , S. M. 1991 . The need for clarification in research designed to examine gender differences in achievement and accomplishment . Roeper Review , 13 : 193 – 198 .
   Google Scholar
• Reis , S. M. and Callahan , C. 1996 . My boyfriend, my girlfriend, or me: The dilemma of talented teenaged girls . Journal of Secondary Gifted Education , 7 : 34 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Richert , E. S. 1997 . “ Excellence with equity in identification and programming ” . In Handbook of gifted education , 2nd , Edited by: Colangelo , N. and Davis , G.A. 75 – 88 . Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , A. , Shore , B. M. and Enersen , D. L. 2007 . Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide , Waco, TX : Prufrock Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sadker , D. 2000 . Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door . Equity & Excellence in Education , 33 : 80 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadker , D. and Zittleman , K. 2005 . Closing the gender gap—Again! . Principle Magazine , 84 ( 4 ) : 19 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadker , M. and Sadker , D. 1994 . Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls , New York, NY : Touchstone Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schroth , S. T. and Jefler , J. A. 2008 . Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures . Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 32 : 155 – 179 .
   Google Scholar
• Siegle , D. 2001 . Overcoming bias in gifted and talented referrals . Gifted Education Communicator , 32 ( 2 ) : 22 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Siegle , D. and Reis , S. 1998 . Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of gifted students' ability and effort . Gifted Child Quarterly , 42 : 39 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman , L. K. 2003 . “ Gifted children with learning disabilities ” . In Handbook of gifted education , 3rd , Edited by: Colangelo , N. and Davis , G.A. 533 – 543 . Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Starko , A. J. 2008 . “ Teacher preparation ” . In Critical issues and practices in gifted education , Edited by: Plucker , J. A. and Callahan , C. M. 681 – 694 . Waco, TX : Prufrock Press .
   Google Scholar
• Swesson , K. 1994 . Helping the gifted/learning disabled: Understanding the special needs of the “twice exceptional” . Gifted Child Today , 17 ( 15 ) : 24 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Tobin , K. and Garmett , P. 1987 . Gender related differences in science activities . Science Education , 71 : 91 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood , M. , Galenand , B. and Paquette , J. 2001 . Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along? . Social Development , 10 : 248 – 266 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdés , G. 2003 . Expanding definitions of giftedness , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Wellesley College Center for Research on Women . 1992 . How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education (AAUW Report) , Washington, DC : American Association of University Women Educational Foundation .
   Google Scholar