Children Using Robotics for Engineering, Science, Technology, and Math (CREST-M): The Development and Evaluation of an Engaging Math Curriculum

REFERENCES

• Catsambis, S. (1994). The path to math: Gender and racial–ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67, 199–215. doi:10.2307/2112791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, S. V. (2012). The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a FIRST LEGO League simulation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 291–316. doi:10.1177/0162353212451788
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, S. V., & Dohrman, R. L. (2015, October). CREST-M curriculum: Children using robotics for science, technology, engineering, and math. Paper presented at the Gifted Association of Missouri Conference, Columbia, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future (Spotlight on statistics). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013, September). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? (Working paper).Oxford, England: University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/future-of-employment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., & Coxon, S. V. (2016). Fostering creativity using robotics among students in STEM fields to reverse the creativity crisis. In M. K. Demetrikopoulos & J. L. Pecore (Eds.), Interplay of creativity and giftedness in science (pp. 53–68). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (1996). Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Science Education, 80, 613–650. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199611)80:6<613::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, C. A. (2009). The integrated curriculum model. In B. MacFarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 271–284). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F. (2003a). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III and the Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6): Are the general factors the same? Iowa City: University of Iowa. Retrieved from http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F. (2003b). The Woodcock–Johnson III and the Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6): A concurrent validity study. Iowa City: University of Iowa. Retrieved from http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F. (2011). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 7). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. P. (2001). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender differences in beliefs and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 26, 254–263. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. S., & Horrigan, J. B. (2014). STEM urgency: Science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in an increasingly unequal and competitive world. Retrieved from http://jointcenter.org/sites/default/files/STEM%20Final%20-%202.5.2014_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Women & Information Technology. (2014). By the numbers. Retrieved from https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/btn_02282014web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014: A broad base of quantitative information on the U.S. and international science and engineering enterprise. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-1/c1s3.htm
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2014). Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-3/c3h.htm
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: aptitude, behaviour, confidence. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264229945-en
   Google Scholar
• Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294–315). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and inspire: K–12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America’s future. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stem-ed-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sainz, M., & Eccles, J. (2011). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 486–499. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senne, J., & Coxon, S. V. (2016). Architecture: A nexus of creativity, math, and spatial ability. Gifted Child Today, 39, 31–39. doi:10.1177/1076217515613385
   Google Scholar
• STEM Opportunities Act of 2016. S. 2784, 114th Congress. (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (1986). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 164–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, L. L, Hanks, B, & McDowell, C. (2004). Pair-programming helps female computer science students. Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 4(1), 1–8. doi:10.1145/1060071
   Google Scholar