Leading Differentiated Learning for the Gifted

REFERENCES

• Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. (2004). Gifted students’ perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 7–20. doi:10.1177/001698620404800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2000). The research base for APA’s learner-centered psychological principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 25–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign (Rev ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., Marron, M., & Colangelo, N. (2014). Acceleration: The fair and equitable intervention for highly able students. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 15–28). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2011). Australian Professional Standard for Principals. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: AITSL. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standard-for-principals
   Google Scholar
• Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C., Tomlinson, C., & Moon, T. (2005). The feasibility of high-end learning in a diverse middle school (Research Monograph 05210). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, C., Tomlinson, C., Moon, T., Brighton, C., & Herbert, H. (2003). Feasibility of high end learning in the middle grades. Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505377.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong teacher perspective. Roeper Review, 23, 197–202. doi:10.1080/02783190109554098
   Google Scholar
• Chessor, D., & Whitton, D. (2008). The impact of grouping gifted primary school students on self concept and achievement. TalentEd, 25(2), 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Marron, M. A. (2013). Evidence trumps beliefs: Academic acceleration is an effective intervention for high-ability students. In C. M. Callahan & H. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 164–175). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2004). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2006). Learning to lead change: Building system capacity. Partnerships in learning: International workshop series with Michael Fullan. Retrieved from http://www.is-toolkit.com/workshop/fullanworkshops/Short_Course.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2013). Motion leadership in action: More skinny on becoming change savvy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximising impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Firmender, J. M., & Carroll, S. R. (2013). The impact of advanced geometry and measurement curriculum units on the mathematics achievement of first-grade students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 71–84. doi:10.1177/0016986213479564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, S. K. (2015). From listening to empowering: A study of high school principals’ perceptions of student voice in classroom instruction (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/23702/
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. (2014). Cluster grouping. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 212–225). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Fugate, C. M. (2013). Cluster grouping programs and the total school cluster grouping model. In C. M. Callahan & H. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 212–225). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (2006). To group or not to group: Is that the question? In C. Smith (Ed.), Including the gifted and talented: Making inclusion work for more gifted and able learners (pp. 119–137). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 125–142. doi:10.1108/09578231111116699
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hertberg-Davis, H. L., & Callahan, C. M. (2013). Defensible curriculum for gifted students: An introduction. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 259–262). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higham, R., Hopkins, D., & Matthews, P. (2009). System leadership in practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., Hunter, A., Lambert, T., & Clark, A. (2015). Aspiring principal preparation. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L. (2011). Deferential differentiation: What types of differentiation do students want? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 279–299. doi:10.1177/0016986211422098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20–28. doi:10.1080/02783190309554235
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. N. (2009). Layering differentiated curricula for the gifted and talented. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 107–136). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L., & Plunkett, M. (2012). Examining teacher attitudes and perceptions of teacher competencies required in a new selective high school. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(2), 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lassig, C. J. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, E., & Milton, M. (2005). Attitudes of teachers before and after professional development. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, C. J., & Nielson, A. (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2010). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Matsko, V., & Thomas, J. (2014). The problem is the solution: Creating original problems in gifted mathematics classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 153–170. doi:10.1177/0162353214529043
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L. (2003). Providing a framework for the redesign of K–12 education in the context of current educational reform issues. Theory into Practice, 42, 93–101. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4202_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L., & Miller, L. (2007). Learner-centered classroom practices and assessments: Maximizing student motivation, learning, and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McHatton, P. A., Boyer, N. R., Shaunessy, E., Terry, P. M., & Farmer, J. L. (2010). Principals’ perceptions of preparation and practice in gifted and special education content: Are we doing enough? Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5, 1–20. doi:10.1177/194277511000500101
   Google Scholar
• Missett, T. C., Brunner, M. M., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Azano, A. P. (2014). Exploring teacher beliefs and use of acceleration, ability, grouping, and formative assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 245–268. doi:10.1177/0162353214541326
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2004). Policy and implementation strategies for the education of gifted and talented students (Revised 2004). Retrieved from https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy-library/associated-documents/polimp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382–396. doi:10.1177/0016986207306324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, K. (2007, February). The imperative of evidence based instructional leadership: Building capacity within professional learning communities via a focus on effective teaching practice. Background paper to keynote address presented at the Sixth International Conference on Educational Leadership, Wollongong, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, A., Croft, L., & Godor, B. (2018). Determining attitudes toward ability: A new tool for new understanding. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29, 29–55. doi:10.1177/1932202X17738989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school's journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 77–87. doi:10.1177/001698629503900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimjoin, K., … Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 119–145. doi:10.1177/016235320302700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Brimjoin, K., & Narvaez, L. (2008). The differentiated school. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004). Assessing classroom practice: The use of a structured observation form. In J. Van Tassel-Baska & A. X. Feng (Eds.), Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement (pp. 87–107). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L. D., Little, C., & Hughes, C. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of curriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244–272. doi:10.1177/016235320002300201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (Eds.). (2011). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners. Theory into Practice, 44, 211–217. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4403_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepeda, S. J. (2013). The principal as instructional leader. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
   Google Scholar