1,476
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
International Perceptions of Giftedness and Gifted Education

Finnish Elementary School Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Gifted Education

Pages 76-87 | Accepted 15 Sep 2018, Published online: 08 May 2019

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27−58. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 1−33.
  • Archambault, F., Westberg, K., Brown, S., Hallmark, B., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers (Research Monograph No. 93102). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2015). Introduction. In S. G. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Lupkowski-Shoplik (Eds.), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 1−6). Cedar Rapids, IA: Colorweb Printing.
  • Atjonen, P., Halinen, I., Hämäläinen, S., Korkeakoski, E., Knubb-Manninen, G., Kupari, P., … Wikman, T. (2008). Tavoitteista vuorovaikutukseen [From goals to interaction] (Report of the Finnish Education Evaluation Council No. 30). Retrieved from http://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2014/09/KAN_30.pdf
  • Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994). Predictors of a general attitude toward gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 74−86.
  • Bracken, B. A., & Brown, E. F. (2006). Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 112−122. doi:10.1177/0734282905285246
  • Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H. L., Moon, T. R., Tomlinson, C. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2005). The feasibility of high-end learning in a diverse middle school (Research Monograph RM05210). Charlottesville, VA: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004a). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 1). [The Templeton National Report on Acceleration]. Iowa City: Iowa University, Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 535 137). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535137.pdf
  • Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004b). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2). [The Templeton National Report on Acceleration]. Iowa City: Iowa University, Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 535 138). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535138.pdf
  • Copenhaver, R., & McIntyre, D. (1992). Teachers’ perception of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 151–153. doi:10.1080/02783199209553411
  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1−9.
  • Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345−374. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034
  • Cross, J. R., Cross, T., & Frazier, A. D. (2013). Student and teacher attitudes toward giftedness in a two laboratory school environment: A case for conducting a needs assessment. NALS Journal, 5(1), 1−21.
  • Davalos, R., & Griffin, G. (1999). The impact of teachers’ individualized practices on gifted students in rural, heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Review, 21, 308−314. doi:10.1080/02783199909553982
  • De Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary school teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 331–353. doi:10.1080/13603110903030089
  • Dettmer, P. (1985). Attitudes of school role groups toward learning needs of gifted students. Roeper Review, 7, 72–76. doi:10.1080/02783198509552910
  • Farrell, P., Dyson, A., Polat, F., Hutcheson, G., & Gallannaugh, F. (2007). Inclusion and achievement in mainstream schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22, 131–145. doi:10.1080/08856250701267808
  • Finn, C. E., & Wright, B. L. (2015). Failing our brightest kids: The global challenge of educating high-ability students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Finnish National Agency for Education. (2004). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2004 [National Core Curriculum in Basic Education 2004]. Vammala, Finland: Vammalan Kirjapaino.
  • Finnish National Agency for Education. (2011). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteiden muutokset ja täydennykset 2010 [Amendments and Additions to the National Core Curriculum for Basic Education]. Tampere, Finland: Tampereen Yliopistopaino.
  • Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014 [National Core Curriculum in Basic Education 2014]. Tampere, Finland: Suomen Yliopistopaino.
  • Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74, 289−306. doi:10.1177/001440290807400302
  • Gagné, F., & Nadeau, L. (1985). Dimensions of attitudes toward giftedness. In A. H. Roldan (Ed.), Gifted and talented children, youth and adults: Their social perspective and culture (pp. 148−170). Monroe, NJ: Trillium Press.
  • Gagné, F., & Nadeau, L. (1991). Opinions about the gifted and their education ( Unpublished instrument).
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. I., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Hattie, J. (2005). The paradox of reducing class size and improving learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 387−425. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.07.002
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hertberg-Davis, H. (2009). Myth 7: Differentiation in the regular classroom is equivalent to gifted programs and is sufficient. Classroom teachers have the time, the skill, and the will to differentiate adequately. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 251−253. doi:10.1177/0016986209346927
  • Huberman, A. M. (1992). The lives of teachers. London, England: Cassell.
  • Jones, E., & Southern, W. (1992). Programming, grouping, and acceleration in rural school districts: A survey of attitudes and practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 112−117. doi:10.1177/001698629203600210
  • Jung, J. Y. (2014). Predictors of attitudes to gifted programs/provisions: Evidence from preservice educators. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 247−258. doi:10.1177/0016986214547636
  • Kumpulainen, K., & Lankinen, T. (2012). Striving for educational equity and excellence: Evaluation and assessment in Finnish basic education. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), The miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 69−81). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
  • Kumpulainen, T. (2011). Opettajat Suomessa 2010 [Teachers in Finland 2010]. Tampere: Tammerprint Oy. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/download/131532_Opettajat_Suomessa_2010.pdf
  • Kuparinen, S. (1995). Lahjakkaiden oppilaiden asema Helsingin peruskoulujen ala-asteilla opettajien kokemana. Tutkimus kvalitatiivisen tasa-arvon toteutumisesta. [Class teachers’ experiences of situation of the gifted pupils in Helsinki primary schools. Study about qualitative equality]. Helsinki, Finland: Helsingin Kaupungin Opetusviraston Julkaisusarja.
  • Laine, S. (2010). The Finnish public discussion of giftedness and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 21, 63−76. doi:10.1080/13598139.2010.488092
  • Laine, S., & Tirri, K. (2016). How Finnish elementary school teachers meet the needs of their gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27, 149−164. doi:10.1080/13598139.2015.1108185
  • Lassig, C. J. (2003). Gifted and talented education reforms: Effects on teachers’ attitudes. In B. Bartlett, F. Bryer, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st annual international conference on cognition, language, and special education research: Reimagining practice: Researching change 2 (pp. 141−152). Queensland, Australia.
  • Lassig, C. J. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32−42.
  • Latz, A. O., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2009). Peer coaching to improve classroom differentiation: Perspectives from project CLUE. Roeper Review, 31, 27−39.
  • McCoach, B. D., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246−255. doi:10.1177/0016986207302719
  • Megay-Nespoli, K. (2001). Beliefs and attitudes of novice teachers regarding instruction of academically talented learners. Roeper Review, 23, 178−182. doi:10.1080/02783190109554092
  • Moberg, S., & Savolainen, H. (2003). Struggling for inclusive education in the North and the South: Educators’ perceptions on inclusive education in Finland and Zambia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26, 21–31. doi:10.1097/01.mrr.0000088446.78481.98
  • Mönks, F. J., & Katzko, M. W. (2005). Giftedness and gifted education. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 187−201). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mönks, F. J., & Pflüger, R. (2005). Gifted education in 21 European countries: Inventory and perspective. Radboud, The Netherlands: University Nijmegen.
  • Moon, S. M. (2009). Myth 15: High ability students don’t face problems and challenges. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 274–276. doi:10.1177/0016986209346943
  • Moon, S. M., & Rosselli, H. C. (2000). Developing gifted programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 499–521). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
  • Moon, T. R., Callahan, C. M., & Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The effects of mentoring relationships on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward academically diverse students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 56−62. doi:10.1177/001698629904300202
  • Morris, S. (1987). Student teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 12, 112–114.
  • Nicpon, M. F., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 3−17.
  • Niemi, H. (2012). The social factors contributing to education and schooling in Finland. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education (pp. 19−38). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
  • Ojanen, S., & Freeman, J. (1994). The attitudes and experiences of head teachers, class teachers, and highly-able pupils towards the education of the highly able in Finland and Britain. (Research Report of the Faculty of Education No. 54.). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.
  • Persson, R. (2011). Ability climates in Europe as socially represented notability. High Ability Studies, 22, 79−101. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.576086
  • Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Exceptionality, 10, 113−125. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX1002_5
  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: MacMillan.
  • Simola, H., Rinne, R., & Kivirauma, J. (2002). Abdication of the education state or just shifting responsibilities? The appearance of a new system of reason in constructing educational governance and social exclusion/inclusion in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 247−264. doi:10.1080/0031383022000005661
  • Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., Pierce, R. L., Cassady, J. C., & Dixon, F. A. (2007). Fourth-grade teachers’ perceptions of giftedness: Implications for identifying and serving diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 478−499.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Tirri, K. A., & Adams, A. M. (2000). A cross-cultural study of teachers’ attitudes toward gifted children and programs for gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 15, 103−115.
  • Tirri, K. (2014). The last 40 years in Finnish teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40, 1–10.
  • Tirri, K., & Kuusisto, E. (2013). How Finland serves gifted and talented pupils. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 84−96.
  • Tirri, K., & Laine, S. (2017). Teacher education in inclusive education. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), The Sage handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 761–776). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Tirri, K., Tallent-Runnells, M., Adams, A., Yuen, M., & Lau, P. (2002). Cross-cultural predictors of teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Finland, Hong Kong, and the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 112−131.
  • Tirri, K., & Uusikylä, K. (1994). How teachers perceive differentiation of education among the gifted and talented. Gifted and Talented International, 9, 69−73.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Townsend, M., & Patrick, H. (1993). Academic and psychosocial apprehensions of teachers and teacher trainees toward the educational acceleration of gifted children. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 28, 29–41.
  • Troxclair, D. A. (2013). Preservice teacher attitudes toward giftedness. Roeper Review, 35, 58–64.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice, 44, 211−217.
  • Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., & Brown, S. W. (1997). A survey of classroom practices with third and fourth grade students in the United States. Gifted Education International, 12, 29−33.
  • Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms (Research monograph No. 93104). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Wood, S., Portman, T., Cigrand, D. L., & Colangelo, N. (2010). School counselors’ perceptions and experience with acceleration as a program option for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 168−178.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.