Research With Gifted Adults: What International Experts Think Needs to Happen to Move the Field Forward

References

• Ambrose, D. (2017). Interdisciplinary exploration supports Sternberg’s expansion of giftedness. Roeper Review, 39, 178. doi:10.1080/02783193.2017.1318660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R. J., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2012). Confronting dogmatism in gifted education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610455.002
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Peterson, E., & Rawlinson, C. (2019). We are not that: A focus group study with gifted adults provides direction for future research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40–year follow-up of the Torrance tests of creative thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–291. doi:10.1177/001698620504900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y. (2017). Envisioning a new foundation for gifted education: Evolving complexity theory (ECT) of talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 172–182. doi:10.1177/0016986217701837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y. (2018). A history of giftedness: A century of quest for identity. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. E. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 3–23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E. (2012). Genius, eminence, and giftedness. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 221–227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, E. D. (2015). Bright adults: Uniqueness and belonging across the lifespan. Tucson, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53, 267–279. doi:10.1002/jocb.395
   Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V. P., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Socializing giftedness: Toward an ACCEL-S approach. Roeper Review, 39, 226. doi:10.1080/02783193.2017.1362682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., & Guerin, D. W. (2006). The Fullerton longitudinal study: A long-term investigation of intellectual and motivational giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 430–450. doi:10.4219/jeg-2006-244
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78, 1695–1704. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellawell, D. (2006). Inside-out: Analysis of the insider-outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 483–494. doi:10.1080/13562510600874292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y. (2012). Giftedness as a developmental construct that leads to eminence as adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 189–193. doi:10.1177/0016986212456072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, D. P. (2009). Developmental science and giftedness: An integrated life-span framework. In F. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Mathews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 189–208). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11867-011
   Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooijman-van Thiel, M. B. G. M. (Ed.). (2008). Hoogbegaafd: You can see that! About self-image and image of gifted individuals. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: OYA Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Landeta, J., Barrutia, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1629–1641. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. O., Porath, M., Yu, H., Chen, C., Tsai, K., & Wu, I. (2018). Giftedness in the making: A transactional perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 1–13. doi:10.1177/0016986218812474
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. J. (2012). Policy, practice in giftedness, and research methodologies: Response to Roland S. Persson’s article. Gifted and Talented International, 27, 111–114. doi:10.1080/15332276.2012.11673615
   Google Scholar
• Mendaglio, S., & Tillier, W. (2006). Dąbrowski’s theory of positive disintegration and giftedness: Overexcitability research findings. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 68–87. doi:10.1177/016235320603000104
   Google Scholar
• Paraskevas, A., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2012). Beyond consensus: An alternative use of Delphi enquiry in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24, 907–924. doi:10.1108/09596111211247236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, R. S. (2014). The needs of the highly able and the needs of society: A multidisciplinary analysis of talent differentiation and its significance to gifted education and issues of societal inequality. Roeper Review, 36, 43–59. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.856830
   Google Scholar
• Persson, R. S. (2017). Reconsidering the ambitions and position of gifted education. Roeper Review, 39, 183. doi:10.1080/02783193.2017.1318992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Addressing disturbing and disturbed consumer behavior: Is it necessary to change the way we conduct behavioral science? Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 1–8. doi:10.2307/3152008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education. Exceptional Children, 80, 390–406. doi:10.1177/0014402914527244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (2011). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan Magazine, 92(8), 81–88. doi:10.1177/003172171109200821
   Google Scholar
• Rinn, A. N., & Bishop, J. (2015). Gifted adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 213–235. doi:10.1177/0016986215600795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London, England: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Shiner, L. E. (1975). Tradition/modernity: An ideal type gone astray. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17, 245–252. doi:10.1017/S0010417500007799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silova, I., Sobe, N. W., & Korzh, A. (2017). Reimagining utopias: Theory and method for educational research in post-socialist contexts. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. K. (2013). Giftedness 101. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K., & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429–434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02313.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2018). 21 ideas: A 42–year search to understand the nature of giftedness. Roeper Review, 40, 7. doi:10.1080/02783193.2018.1393609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2019). The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Stoeger, H., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2017). Talent development research, policy, and practice in Europe and the United States: Outcomes from a summit of international researchers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 269. doi:10.1177/0016986217701839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. (2013). Epilogue: Toward an integrative understanding of creativity, talent, and excellence. In A. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, talent, and excellence (pp. 263–271). Singapore: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Tansley, C. (2011). What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management? Industrial and Commercial Training, 43, 266–274. doi:10.1108/00197851111145853
   Google Scholar
• Tegarden, D., Tegarden, L., Smith, W., & Sheetz, S. (2016). De-fusing organizational power using anonymity and cognitive factions in a participative strategic planning setting. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25, 1–29. doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9430-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2, 149–171. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (1996). The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. In M. Adler & E. Zigio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle (pp. 56–85). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25–year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860–871. doi:10.1037/a0019454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirthwein, L., & Rost, D. H. (2011). Giftedness and subjective well-being: A study with adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 182–186. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 551–576. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., & Vialle, W. (2012). Giftedness and gifted education: The need for a paradigm change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 194–197. doi:10.1177/0016986212456070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle (pp. 3–33). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar