Issues in the Use and Interpretation of Intelligence Tests in the Schools: Guest Editors' Comments

References

• Bagnato, S. J., & Neisworth, J. T. (1994). A national study of the social and treatment “invalidity” of intelligence testing for early intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, D. W., & McMann, G. M. (1992). Decision reliability and validity: Contributions and limitations of alternative assessment strategies. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 431–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. A. (1991). School psychologists' roles and functions: Integration into the regular classroom. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & Y. H. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems. Colesville, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Benowitz, S., & Barringer, K. (1987). Norm-referenced tests: Are they valid for use with handicapped students? Exceptional Children, 54, 263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Vollmer, M., Creek, R. J., Katz, L., & Chowdhri, S. (1993). Treatment utility of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: Effects of matching instruction and student processing strength. School Psychology Review, 22, 8–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, W. (1981). Validity, vaudeville, and values. American Psychologist, 86, 1021–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, J. E. (1997). The triple quandary of race, culture, and social class in standardized cognitive ability testing. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (pp. 517–532). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. R., Robinson-Zanartu, C., & Jensen, M. L (1992). Dynamic assessment and mediated learning: Assessment and intervention for developing cognitive and knowledge structures. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education Advisory Committee on the Reform of California's Assessment of Procedures in Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. J. (1990). Found: Our intelligences: What do they mean? Journal of Psychoeducational As sessment, 8, 259–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. J. (1994). IQ testing: The past not the future. Sacramento, CA: California State University at Sacramento and California Department of Education, Resources in Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. J. (1997). Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In D. R Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 437–456). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson-Zanartu, C., Sattler, J. M., Reschly, D. J., & Sandoval, J. (1994). IQ testing: The past or the fitPure? The Sattler-Reschly debate. Sacramento, CA: California State University at Sacramento and California Department of Education, Resources in Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1994). Focusing on educational outcomes: Challenges for special services personnel Special Services in the Schools, 8(2), 167–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ysseldyke, J., & Mirkin, P. (1982). The use of assessment information to plan instructional interventions: A review of the research. In C. R. Reynolds & T. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 395–409). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar