Cognitive Processing of Low Achievers and Children with Reading Disabilities: A Selective Meta-Analytic Review of the Published Literature

References

• refers to studies in meta-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Aaron, P. G. (1987). Developmental dyslexia: Is it different from other forms of reading disability? Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 109–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron, P. G. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 3, 178–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461–502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badian, N. A. (1993). Predicting reading progress in children receiving special help. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 90–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badian, N. A. (1994). Do dyslexic and other poor readers differ in reading-related cognitive skills? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal?, 6, 45–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badian, N. A. (1996). Dyslexia: A validation of the concept at two age levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29 (1), 102–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. J. (1990). Coaching for the scholastic aptitude test: Further synthesis and appraisal. Review of Educational Research 60(3) 373–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. J., & Schram, C. M. I. (1994). Examining explanatory models through research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 357–383). New York: Russell Sage. Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399–409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 3–20). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure “change” - or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 733–740.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N., & Large, B. (1987). The development of reading: As you seek so you find. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. B. (1992). A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQ. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Rourke, B. P., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 9, 555–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P, Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 1, 6–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Mathes, P., Fuchs, L. & Lipsey, M. (in progress). Is LD just a fancy term for underachievers? To be submitted as a final report to the U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Davidson, K. C., & Thompson, N. M. (1991). Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredman, G. & Stevenson, J. (1988). Reading processes in specific reading retarded and reading backward 13-year-olds. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 339–355). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (1998). Within study meta-analysis: Pooling the significance of doubly nonindependent (nonoveriapping) correlations. Psychological Methods, 3(1), 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1994). Statistical considerations. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 29–38). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hurford, D. P., Schauf, J. D., Bunce, L., Blaich, T., & Moore, K. (1994). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 6, 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalain, H. A., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1996). A multivariate linear model for meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 1 (3), 227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 44–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. S., Rugg, M. D., & Scott, T. (1987). Phonological similarity effects, memory span and developmental reading disorders: The nature of the relationship. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 205–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. S., Rugg, M. D., & Scott, T. (1988). The influence of phonology on good and poor readers when reading for meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L., MacLean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Cognitive factors at school entry predictive of specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27, 1, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. & Forness, S. (1994). Learning disabilities and intelligence: An uneasy alliance. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 1–64). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. (1956). The measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 421–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Peterson, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in pre-school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R. (1981). The fallacy of “two years below grade level for age as a diagnostic criterion for reading disorders. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 250–258.
   Google Scholar
• Rogosa, D. R. (1988). Myths about longitudinal research. In K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. Meredith, & S. C. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research (pp. 171–210). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file-drawer” problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 863–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (1997). SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release 6.12. Cary, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., Bruck, M., Fornarolo, G., & Backman, J. (1985) Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differ? Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1992). Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 10, 639–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S. (1991). The cognitive basis of dyslexia. In R. Pasnak & M. L. Howe (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development (pp. 33–52). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 10, 618–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: the influence of definitional variables. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 257–287.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Williams, S. (1983). Some characteristics of 9-year-old boys with general reading backwardness or specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 3, 407–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R. L. (1995). Phonological awareness in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing, 7, 217–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 24–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1988). Learning disabled children's problem solving. Intelligence, 12, 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1989). The effects of central processing strategies on learning disabled, mildly retarded, average and gifted children's elaborative encoding abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 370–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1990). Executive processing differences between learning disabled, mildly retarded, and normal achieving children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 5, 549–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1993). An information processing analysis of learning disabled children's problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 861–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1996). Theoretical, technical, and practical aspects of the S-Cognitive Processing Test: The development of a dynamic assessment measure. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 10A, 135–208.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. G., Satz, P. & Friel, J. (1979). Developmental dyslexia in relation to other childhood reading disorders: significance and clinical utility. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 1, 84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, G., & Siegel, L. (1994). A critical evaluation of the IQ-achievement discrepancy based definition of dyslexia. In K. van deb Bos, L. Siegel, D. Bakker, & D. Share (Eds.), Current Directions in Dyslexia Research (pp. 45–70). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, T. D., & Payne, R. (1973). Are deficiency scores deficient? Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 322–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanous, J. P., & Lawler, E. E. III (1972). Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Shinn, M. R., & McGrue, M. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1982). Gain scores in research can be highly reliable. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar