Balancing teaching style in the engagement of primary students in science lessons: the examples of four teachers

References

• Ainley, M., and J. Ainley. 2011. “Student Engagement with Science in Early Adolescence: The Contribution of Enjoyment to Students’ Continuing Interest in Learning about Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (1): 4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assor, A., H. Kaplan, Y. Kanat-Maymon, and G. Roth. 2005. “Directly Controlling Teacher Behaviors as Predictors of Poor Motivation and Engagement in Girls and Boys: The Role of Anger and Anxiety.” Learning and Instruction 15 (5): 397–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. 2014. Kuidas õpilasi motiveerida: käsiraamat õpetajatele. [ How to Motivate Students: Handbook for Teachers]. Tallinn: Archimedes.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., H. A. Schweingruber, A. W. Shouse, and Committee on Science Learning Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. National Research Council (US). Board on Science Education & National Research Council (US). 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K, 8. Washington: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., and M. T. Wang. 2012. “Part I Commentary: So What is Student Engagement Anyway?” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 133–145. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. 2012. “Qualitative Research Methods for Science Education.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, 1451–1469. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fortus, D., J. Krajcik, K. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie. 2012. “Curriculum Coherence and Learning Progressions.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser, 783–798. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Researtimoch 74 (1): 59–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., T. Hofkens, M. T. Wang, E. Mortenson, and P. Scott. 2018. “Supporting Girls’ and Boys’ Engagement in Math and Science Learning: A Mixed Methods Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (2): 271–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin, P. F., and M. J. Kieffer. 2015. “Describing Profiles of Instructional Practice A New Approach to Analyzing Classroom Observation Data.” Educational Researcher 44 (5): 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R., and R. Duschl. 2017. “Learning Science.” In Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, edited by R. E. Mayer, and P. A. Alexander, 81–114. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henno, I. 2015. Loodusteaduste õppimisest ja õpetamisest Eesti koolides rahvusvaheliste võrdlusuuringute taustal. [Learning and teaching science in Estonian schools – in the frame of international studies]. (Doktoritöö). [Doctoral thesis]. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikool.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H., J. Reeve, and E. L. ja Deci. 2010. “Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It is not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (3): 588–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., L. Gerard, C. Matuk, and K. W. McElhaney. 2016. “Science Education: From Separation to Integration.” Review of Research in Education 40 (1): 529–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mant, J., H. Wilson, and D. Coates. 2007. “The Effect of Increasing Conceptual Challenge in Primary Science Lessons on Pupils’ Achievement and Engagement.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (14): 1707–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minogue, J., L. Madden, J. Bedward, E. Wiebe, and M. Carter. 2010. “The Cross-Case Analyses of Elementary Students’ Engagement in the Strands of Science Proficiency.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21 (5): 559–587.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. 2010. Educational Phycology. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Näkk, A. M., and I. Timoštšuk. 2019. “The Dynamics of Learning Engagement and its Relationship with Teachers’ Classroom Practices in Primary School.” Education 3-13 47 (1): 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, D. P., and L. D. Newton. 2011. “Engaging Science: pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Notions of Engaging Science Lessons.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (2): 327–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olitsky, S. 2007. “Promoting Student Engagement in Science: Interaction Rituals and the Pursuit of a Community of Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (1): 33–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poom-Valickis, K., A. L. Jõgi, I. Timoštšuk, and A. Oja. 2016. “Õpetajate juhendamispraktika seosed õpilaste kaasatusega õppimisse I ja III kooliastme tundides.” Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education 4 (1): 258–278.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2012. “A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 149–172. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2016. “Autonomy-supportive Teaching: What it is, how to do it.” In Building Autonomous Learners, edited by L. W. Chia, J. W. C. Keng, and R. M. Ryan, 129–152. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., H. Jang, D. Carrell, S. Jeon, and J. Barch. 2004. “Enchancing Students’ Engagement by Increasing Teachers’ Autonomy Support.” Motivation and Emotion 28 (2): 147–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., M. Vansteenkiste, A. Assor, I. Ahmad, S. H. Cheon, H. Jang, and C. J. Wang. 2014. “The Beliefs That Underlie Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Teaching: A Multinational Investigation.” Motivation and Emotion 38 (1): 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K. J. 2014. “Elementary Science Teaching.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by N. G. Lederman, and S. K. Abell, 361–394. New York: Taylor & Frances.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2016. “Facilitating and Hindering Motivation, Learning, and Well-Being in Schools: Research and Observations From Self-Determination Theory.” In Handbook of Motivation at School, edited by K. R. Wenzel, and D. B. Miele, 96–119. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Naylor, B. Keogh, J. Maloney, and B. Downing. 2008. “Puppets Promoting Engagement and Talk in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (9): 1229–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K., M. Granville, and S. Dika. 2000. “Mathematics and Science Achievement: Effects of Motivation, Interest, and Academic Engagement.” The Journal of Educational Research 95 (6): 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., and M. J. Belmont. 1993. “Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behaviour and Student Engagement Across the School Year.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (4): 571–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroet, K., M. C. Opdenakker, and A. Minnaert. 2013. “Effects of Need Supportive Teaching on Early Adolescents’ Motivation and Engagement: A Review of the Literature.” Educational Research Review 9: 65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Dordrecht: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Timoštšuk, I. 2016. “Primary Science Teaching–Is it Integral and Deep Experience for Students?” Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education 7 (1): 82–99.
   Google Scholar
• Timoštšuk, I., and S. Jaanila. 2015. “Primary Teachers’ Instructional Behavior as Related to Students’ Engagement in Science Learning.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 197: 1597–1602.
   Google Scholar
• Tröbst, S., T. Kleickmann, K. Lange- Schubert, A. Rothkopf, and K. Möller. 2016. “Instruction and Students`Declining Interest in Science: An Analysis of German Fourth and Sixth Grade Classrooms.” American Educational Research Journal 53 (1): 162–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., and J. Osborne. 2012. “Student Attitudes and Aspirations Towards Science.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, 597–625. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., J. Osborne, G. Williams, K. Tytler, J. C. Clark, A. Tomei, and A. H. Forgasz. 2008. Opening up Pathways : Engagement in STEM across the Primary-Secondary school transition.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. P., and R. B. Johnson. 2011. Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. 2016. “Teacher-student Relationships.” In Handbook of Motivation at School, edited by K. R. Wenzel, and D. B. Miele, 211–230. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar