Constructing clarity – Swedish teachers’ and students’ shared concern in feedback interaction in primary school classrooms

References

• Alderson, Priscilla. 2005. “Designing Ethical Research with Children.” In Ethical Research with Children, edited by Ann Farrell, 27–36. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Laura. 2004. “Teacher-Pupil Talk in Whole-Class Discussions and Processes of Social Positioning Within the Primary School Classroom.” Language and Education 18 (5): 347–360. doi:10.1080/09500780408666888.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, and Dylan Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boistrup, Lisa Björklund. 2015. “Governing Through Implicit and Explicit Assessment Acts: Multimodality in Mathematics Classrooms.” In Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality, edited by M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, and R. Stooke, 131–148. London: Bloomsbury books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Gavin T. L., Lois R. Harris, and Jennifer Harnett. 2012. “Teacher Beliefs About Feedback Within an Assessment for Learning Environment: Endorsement of Improved Learning Over Student Well-Being.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (7): 968–978. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, David, Diane Salter, Min Yang, and Joy Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, Joel M. 2009. Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, an Interpretation, an Integration. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, Ruth. 2014. “Assessment as Learning: Blurring the Boundaries of Assessment and Learning for Theory, Policy and Practice.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2): 149–166. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, Ruth. 2019. “Feedback as a Relational Concept in the Classroom.” Curriculum Journal 30 (4): 352–374. doi:10.1080/09585176.2019.1636839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Elisabeth, Lisa Björklund Boistrup, and Robert Thornberg. 2017. “A Categorisation of Teacher Feedback in the Classroom: A Field Study on Feedback Based on Routine Classroom Assessment in Primary School.” Research Papers in Education 32 (3): 316–332. doi:10.1080/02671522.2016.1225787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Elisabeth, Lisa Björklund Boistrup, and Robert Thornberg. 2018. “A Qualitative Study of Primary Teachers’ Classroom Feedback Rationales.” Educational Research 60 (2): 189–205. doi:10.1080/00131881.2018.1451759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Elisabeth, Lisa Björklund Boistrup, and Robert Thornberg. 2020. “‘You Must Learn Something During a Lesson’: How Primary Students Construct Meaning from Teacher Feedback.” Educational Studies, doi:10.1080/03055698.2020.1753177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Carol, and Michael Waring. 2011. “Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Feedback in Relation to Cognitive Styles and Culture.” Research Papers in Education 26 (2): 171–190. doi:10.1080/02671522.2011.561976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frelin, Anneli. 2010. Teachers’ Relational Practices and Professionality. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, Siv M. 2015. “Feedback to Support Learning: Changes in Teachers’ Practice and Beliefs.” Teacher Development 19 (4): 461–482. doi:10.1080/13664530.2015.1060254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martyn. 1990. Classroom Ethnography – Empirical and Methodological Essays. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, Eleanore. 2011. “Teachers’ Feedback to Pupils: ‘Like so Many Bottles Thrown out to Sea’?” In Assessment Reform in Education - Policy and Practice, edited by Rita Berry and Bob Adamson, 121–133. Dortrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, Eleanore. 2013. “Inquiring Into Children’s Experiences of Teacher Feedback: Reconceptualising Assessment for Learning.” Oxford Review of Education 39 (2): 229–246. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.787922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, John, and Helen Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, Berit S., and Marianne Ødegaard. 2015. “Formative Assessment and Teachers’ Sensitivity to Student Responses.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (4): 629–654. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.1003262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irving, S. Earl, Lois R. Harris, and Elizabeth R. Peterson. 2011. “‘One Assessment Doesn’t Serve All the Purposes’ or Does It? New Zealand Teachers Describe Assessment and Feedback.” Asia Pacific Education Review 12 (3): 413–426. doi:10.1007/s12564-011-9145-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragelund, Linda. 2013. “The Obser-View: A Method of Generating Data and Learning.” Nurse Researcher 20 (5): 6–10. doi:10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.6.e296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipnevich, Anastasiya A., David A. G. Berg, and Jeffrey K. Smith. 2016. “Toward a Model of Student Response to Feedback.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by Gavin T. L. Brown and Lois R. Harris, 169–185. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, Nancy. 1991. “The Least-Adult Role in Studying Children.” In Studying the Social Worlds of Children: Sociological Readings, edited by I. Waksler, 38–59. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayall, Berry. 2002. Towards a Sociology for Childhood – Thinking from Children’s Lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, Lisa. 2014. “The Motivational Paradox of Feedback: Teacher and Student Perceptions.” The Curriculum Journal 25 (4): 526–541. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.944197.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, Carol. 2018. “Descriptive Feedback: Student Voice in K-5 Classrooms.” The Australian Educational Researcher 45 (1): 87–102. doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0263-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, Valerie J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2019. Läroplan för Grundskolan, Förskoleklassen och Fritidshemmet (Reviderad 2019). [Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preeschool Class and School-age Educare (Revised 2019)]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Research Council. 2017. CODEX: Regler och Riktlinjer för Forskning. Stockholm: The Swedish Resarch Council. http://www.codex.vr.se.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, William Isaac, and Dorothy Swaine Thomas. 1928. The Child in America: Behaviour Problems and Programs. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, Paul L., and Jeff Kerssen-Griep. 2011. “Instructional Feedback I: The Interaction of Face Work and Immediacy on Students’ Perceptions of Instructor Credibility.” Communication Education 60 (1): 75–94. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.507820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhead, Martin, and Dorothy Faulkner. 2008. “Subjects Objects or Participants? Dilemmas of Psychological Research with Children.” In Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, 2nd ed, edited by Pia Christensen and Allison James, 10–37. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar