Facial perception, self-esteem and psychosocial well-being in patients after nasal surgery due to trauma, cancer and aesthetic needs (cluster analysis of multiple interrelations)

References

• Balikci HH, Gurdal MM. 2014. Satisfaction outcomes in open functional septorhinoplasty: prospective analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 25(2):377–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal BT, White EK, Behera AK, McGuinness AE, Zavell AE, Blangger H, Armbrecht ES, Maher IA. 2018. A novel, disease-specific self-report instrument to measure body image concerns in patients with head and neck skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 44(1):17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzeval M, Green MJ, Macintyre S. 2013. Does perceived physical attractiveness in adolescence predict better socioeconomic position in adulthood? Evidence from 20 years of follow up in a population cohort study. PLoS One. 8(5):e63975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bóo FL, Rossi MA, Urzúa SS. 2013. The labor market return to an attractive face: evidence from a field experiment. Econ Lett. 118(1):170–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broer PN, Buonocore S, Morillas A, Liu J, Tanna N, Walker M, Ng R, Ng R, Persing JA. 2012. Nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 130(6):843e–850e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Zheng Y, Li P, Bin Y, Liu H. 2018. The effect of romantic relationships on the evaluation of the attractiveness of one’s own face. IPE. 9(2):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan C. 2005. Facial disfigurement and sense of self in head and neck cancer. Soc Work Health Care. 40(2):73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen S, Velozo CA, Mann WC. 2007. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale as a measure of self-esteem for the noninstitutionalized elderly. Clin Gerontol. 31(1):77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook SA, Rosser R, Salmon P. 2006. Is cosmetic surgery an effective psychotherapeutic intervention? A systematic review of the evidence. JPRAS. 59(11):1133–1151.
   Google Scholar
• Danel DP, Siennicka AE, Fedurek P, Frackowiak T, Sorokowski P, Jankowska EA, Pawlowski B. 2017. Men with a terminal illness relax their criteria for facial attractiveness. Am J Mens Health. 11(4):1247–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RE. 2006. Rhinoplasty and concepts of facial beauty. Facial Plast Surg. 22(3):198–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dayan S, Romero DH. 2018. Introducing a novel model: the special theory of relativity for attractiveness to define a natural and pleasing outcome following cosmetic treatments. J Cosmet Dermatol. 17:925–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew BA, Karia PS, Mora AN, Liang CA, Schmults CD. 2017. Treatment patterns, outcomes, and patient satisfaction of primary epidermally limited nonmelanoma skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 43(12):1423–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis MA, Sterba KR, Brennan EA, Maurer S, Hill EG, Day TA, Graboyes EM. 2019. A Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing body image disturbance in patients with head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 160(6):941–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Hreczko TA, Deutsch C, Munro IR. 1984. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod. 86(1):52–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR. 1986. Geography of the nose: a morphometric study. Aesth Plast Surg. 10(1):191–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher JM. 2009. Beauty vs. brains: early labor market outcomes of high school graduates. Econ Lett. 105(3):321–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flügel B, Greil H, Sommer K. 1986. Anthropologischer Atlas. Berlin: Verlag Tribüne.
   Google Scholar
• Freiwald W, Duchaine B, Yovel G. 2016. Face processing systems: from neurons to real-world social perception. Annu Rev Neurosci. 39(1):325–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanis C, Sanchez IS, Roostaeian J, Crisera C. 2013. Factors influencing patient interest in plastic surgery and the process of selecting a surgeon. Aesth Plast Surg. 33(4):585–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Niddam J, Noel W, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. 2018. Comparison of aesthetic facial criteria between Caucasian and East Asian female populations: an esthetic surgeon’s perspective. Asian J Sur. 41(1):4–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill-Spector K, Weiner KS, Gomez J, Stigliani A, Natu VS. 2018. The functional neuroanatomy of face perception: from brain measurements to deep neural networks. Interface Focus. 8(4):20180013–20180012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herruer JM, Prins JB, van Heerbeek N, Verhage-Damen G, Ingels K. 2015. Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 35(6):1596–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honigman RJ, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. 2004. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 113(4):1229–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imadojemu S, Sarwer BD, Percec I, Sonnad SS, Goldsack JE, Berman M, Sobanko JF. 2013. Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcome a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 149(11):1325–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Hurst C, Simon LS. 2009. Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness. J Appl Psychol. 94(3):742–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamburogˇlu HO, Özgür F. 2007. Postoperative satisfaction and the patient’s body image, life satisfaction, and self-esteem: a retrospective study comparing adolescent girls and boys after cosmetic surgery. Aesth Plast Surg. 31(6):739–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos EA, Temp M, Schaefer DJ, Haug M, Kalbermatten DF, Toth BA. 2017. Validating facial aesthetic surgery results with the FACE-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 139(4):839–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karia PS, Han J, Schmults CD. 2013. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012. JAAD. 68(6):957–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolar JC, Salter EM. 1996. Craniofacial anthropometry: practical measurement of the head and face for clinical, surgical and research use. Springfield (MA): Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Lemay JEP, Clark SM, Greenberg A. 2010. What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 36(3):339–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan AJ, Gordon GE, Loffler G. 2017. Contributions of individual face features to face discrimination. Vision Res. 137:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manevska I, Pavlic A, Katic V, Zrinski TM, Drevensek M, Spalj S. 2018. Satisfaction with facial profile aesthetics: are norms overrated? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 47(1):72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margraf J, Meyer AH, Lavallee KL. 2013. Well-being from the knife? Psychological effects of aesthetic surgery. Clin Psychol Sci. 1(3):239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Martin I, Schaarschmidt ML, Glocker A, Herr R, Schmieder A, Goerdt S, Peitsch WK. 2016. Patient preferences for treatment of basal cell carcinoma: importance of cure and cosmetic outcome. Acta Derm Venerol. 96(3):355–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menick FJ. 2007. Defects of the nose, lip, and cheek: rebuilding the composite defect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 120(4):887–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menick FJ. 2010. Nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 125(4):138–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menick FJ. 2016. Principles and planning in nasal and facial reconstruction: making a normal face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(6):1033e–1047e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogilski JK, Welling L. 2017. The relative importance of sexual dimorphism, fluctuating asymmetry, and color cues to health during evaluation of potential partners’ facial photographs a conjoint analysis study. Hum Nat. 28(1):53–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolenburgh SE, McLennan L, Levendag PC, Munte K, Scholtemeijer M, Hofer SOP, Mureau M. 2010. Nasal reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: an algorithm for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 126(1):97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore IIK, Thompson R, Lian T. 2019. The pedicled levator labii superioris alaeque nasi flap: a durable single-stage option for reconstruction of full-thickness nasal defects. Am J Otolaryngol. 40(2):279–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison SH, Vyas KS, Motakef S, Gast KM, Chung MT, Rashidi V, Satterwhite T, et al. 2016. Facial feminization: systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(6):1759–1770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi SJ, Aramideh JA, Fattahi SS, Amanolahi A, Hesamirostami M. 2018. Quality of life before and after rhinoplasty surgery measured with SF-36, RSES, and WHOQOL-BREF. Eur J Plast Surg. 41(5):535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mureau MAM, Moolenburgh SE, Levendag PC, Hofer SO. 2007. Aesthetic and functional outcome following nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 120(5):1217–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor KM, Gladstone E. 2017. Beauty and social capital: being attractive shapes social networks. Soc Netw. 52:42–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepper JP, Asaria J, Kim JC, Baker SC, Moyer JS. 2012. Patient assessment of psychosocial dysfunction following nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 129(2):430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz-Timme S, Gabriel P, Tutkuviene J, Poppa P, Obertova Z, Gibelli D, De Angelis D, et al. 2011. Metric and morphological assessment of facial features: a study on three European populations. Forensic Sci Int. 207(1-3):239.e1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins RW, Hendin HM, Trzesniewski KH. 2001. Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 27(2):151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M. 1965. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarwer DB, Infield AL, Baker JL, Casas LA, Glat PM, Gold AH, Jewell ML, et al. 2008. Two-year results of a prospective, multi-site investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 28(3):245–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schnabl SM, Breuninger H, Iordanou E, Scheu A, Kofler L, Häfner HM, Eberle FC. 2018. Patient satisfaction in 1827 patients following various methods of facial reconstruction based on age, defect size and site. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 16(4):426–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzer JA, Sher SR, Fan KL, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB. 2015. Assessing patient-reported satisfaction with appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q appraisal scales. Plast Reconstr Surg. 135(5):830e–837e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slator R, Harris DL. 1992. Are rhinoplasty patients potentially mad? Br J Plast Surg. 45(4):307–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobanko JF, Sarwer DB, Zvargulis Z, Miller CJ. 2015. Importance of physical appearance in patients with skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 41(2):183–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer IN, Zernial O, Nolke F, Warnke PH, Wiltfang J, Russo PAJ, Terheyden H, Wolfart S. 2008. Gender and nasal shape: measures for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 121(2):629–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorra ML. 2014. Self-efficacy and self-esteem in third-year pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 78(7):134–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar