Longitudinal composite 3D faces and facial growth trends in children 6–11 years of age using 3D cephalometric surface imaging

References

• Agbolade O, Nazri A, Yaakob R, Ghani AA, Cheah YK. 2020. Morphometric approach to 3D soft-tissue craniofacial analysis and classification of ethnicity, sex, and age. PLoS One. 15(4):e0228402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allanson JE. 1997. Objective techniques for craniofacial assessment: what are the choices? Am J Med Genet. 70(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aung SC, Ngim RCK, Lee ST. 1995. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. Br J Plast Surg. 48(8):551–558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aynechi N, Larson BE, Leon-Salazar V, Beiraghi S. 2011. Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition. Angle Orthod. 81(2):245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont CAA, Knoops PGM, Borghi A, Jeelani NUO, Koudstaal MJ, Schievano S, Dunaway DJ, Rodriguez-Florez N. 2017. Three-dimensional surface scanners compared with standard anthropometric measurements for head shape. J Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg off Publ Eur Assoc Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg. 45(6):921–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugaighis I, Mattick CR, Tiddeman B, Hobson R. 2014. 3D asymmetry of operated children with oral clefts. Orthod Craniofac Res. 17(1):27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho M-J, Hallac RR, Ramesh J, Seaward JR, Hermann NV, Darvann TA, Lipira A, Kane AA. 2018. Quantifying normal craniofacial form and baseline craniofacial asymmetry in the pediatric population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 141(3):380e–387e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou P-Y, Denadai R, Chen S-H, Tseng H-J, Hsu C-K, Wang S-W, Hallac R, et al. 2019. Identifying three-dimensional facial fluctuating asymmetry in normal pediatric individuals: a panel assessment outcome study of clinicians and observers. JCM. 8(5):648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denadai R, Tu JC-Y, Tsai Y-R, Tsai Y-N, Hsieh EY-J, Pai BC, Chen C-H, et al. 2019. Workflow and strategies for recruitment and retention in longitudinal 3D craniofacial imaging study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(22):4438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch CK, Shell AR, Francis RW, Bird BD. 2012. The Farkas system of craniofacial anthropometry: methodology and normative databases. In: Preedy VR, editor. Handbook of Anthroplogy. New York, NY: Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas LG. 1994. Anthropometry of the head and face. New York: Raven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas LG. 1996. Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: past, present, and future. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 33(1):10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas LG, Deutsch CK. 1996. Anthropometric determination of craniofacial morphology. Am J Med Genet. 65(1):1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas LG, Hreczko TM, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. 2003. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American White children between 1 and 5 years of age. J Craniofac Surg. 14(1):13–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Ciusa V, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. 2001. The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 59(4):382–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto L, Molenbroek JFM, Goossens RHM. 2013. 3D anthropometric data set of the head and face of children aged 0.5-6 years for design applications. Proceedings of 4th International Conference of 3D Body Scanning Technology, Long Beach, CA, USA, 19–20 November 2013. Long Beach CA, USA: Hometrica Consulting – Dr. Nicola D’Apuzzo.
   Google Scholar
• Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. 2004. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I. J Orthod. 31(1):62–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heike CL, Cunningham ML, Hing AV, Stuhaug E, Starr JR. 2009. Picture perfect? Reliability of craniofacial anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 124(4):1261–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hönn M, Göz G. 2007. Reference values for craniofacial structures in children 4 to 6 years old: review of the literature. J Orofac Orthop. 68(3):170–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C-K, Hallac RR, Denadai R, Wang S-W, Kane AA, Lo L-J, Chou P-Y. 2019. Quantifying normal head form and craniofacial asymmetry of elementary school students in Taiwan. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 72(12):2033–2040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Richmond S. 2008. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 134(6):751–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolar JC, Salter EM. 1997. Craniofacial anthropometry: practical measurement of the head and face for clinical, surgical, and research use. Springfield, Ill., U.S.A: C.C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Koudelová J, Dupej J, Brůžek J, Sedlak P, Velemínská J. 2015. Modelling of facial growth in Czech children based on longitudinal data: age progression from 12 to 15 years using 3D surface models. Forensic Sci Int. 248:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koudelová J, Hoffmannová E, Dupej J, Velemínská J. 2019. Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data. PLOS One. 14(2):e0212618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krimmel M, Breidt M, Bacher M, Müller-Hagedorn S, Dietz K, Bülthoff H, Reinert S, Kluba S. 2015. Three-dimensional normal facial growth from birth to the age of 7 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 136(4):490e–501e–501e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, et al. 2000. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. (314):1–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipira AB, Sachanandani NS, Govier D, Payne A, Wyas S, Kleeschulte W, Kane AA. 2010. Craniobank: an online collection of three-dimensional normative craniofacial images. Plast Reconstr Surg. 126(2):70e–72e–72e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lübbers H-T, Medinger L, Kruse A, Grätz KW, Matthews F. 2010. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application. J Craniofac Surg. 21(3):763–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus JR, Domeshek LF, Loyd AM, Schoenleber JM, Das RR, Nightingale RW, Mukundan S. 2009. Use of a three-dimensional, normative database of pediatric craniofacial morphology for modern anthropometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 124(6):2076–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir MB, Ilgaz A, Dilak A, Ayten H, Esat A. 2007. Describing normal variations of head and face by using standard measurement and craniofacial variability index (CVI) in seven-year-old normal children. J Craniofac Surg. 18(3):470–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzler P, Bruegger LS, Kruse Gujer AL, Matthews F, Zemann W, Graetz KW, Luebbers H-T. 2012. Craniofacial landmarks in young children: how reliable are measurements based on 3-dimensional imaging? J Craniofac Surg. 23(6):1790–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller M, Schaupp E, Massumi-Möller N, Zeyher C, Godt A, Berneburg M. 2012. Reference values for three-dimensional surface cephalometry in children aged 3–6 years: reference values for 3–6-year-old children. Orthod Craniofac Res. 15(2):103–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord F, Ferjencik R, Seifert B, Lanzer M, Gander T, Matthews F, Rücker M, Lübbers H-T. 2015. The 3dMD photogrammetric photo system in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: validation of interexaminer variations and perceptions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 43(9):1798–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nute SJ, Moss JP. 2000. Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning. J Orthod. 27(1):31–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozsoy U, Demirel BM, Yildirim FB, Tosun O, Sarikcioglu L. 2009. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 37(5):285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins JD, Collins JS, Holden KR. 2010. United States head circumference growth reference charts: birth to 21 years. J Pediatr. 156(6):907–913.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sforza C, Dolci C, Tommasi DG, Pisoni L, De Menezes M, Elamin F. 2014. Three-dimensional facial distances of Northern Sudanese persons from childhood to young adulthood. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 42(5):e318–e326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sforza C, Laino A, D'Alessio R, Dellavia C, Grandi G, Ferrario VF. 2007. Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive children and normal children in the deciduous and early mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 77(6):1025–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SK. 2015. Role of craniofacial anthropometry in medical science. Int Invent J Med Med Sci. 2(4):44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor HO, Morrison CS, Linden O, Phillips B, Chang J, Byrne ME, Sullivan SR, Forrest CR. 2014. Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry. J Craniofac Surg. 25(1):124–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutkuviene J, Cattaneo C, Obertová Z, Ratnayake M, Poppa P, Barkus A, Khalaj-Hedayati K, et al. 2016. Age- and sex-related growth patterns of the craniofacial complex in European children aged 3-6 years. Ann Hum Biol. 43(6):510–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts. 2021 [accessed May 18]. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/TX.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg SM. 2019. 3D stereophotogrammetry versus traditional craniofacial anthropometry: comparing measurements from the 3D facial norms database to Farkas’s North American norms. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 155(5):693–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg SM, Kolar JC. 2005. Three-dimensional surface imaging: limitations and considerations from the anthropometric perspective. J Craniofac Surg. 16(5):847–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP, Martin RA, Kane AA, Marazita ML. 2006. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. J Craniofac Surg. 17(3):477–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg SM, Raffensperger ZD, Kesterke MJ, Heike CL, Cunningham ML, Hecht JT, Kau CH, et al. 2016. The 3D facial norms database: part 1. A web-based craniofacial anthropometric and image repository for the clinical and research community. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 53(6):e185–e197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E, Hunt AT, Rogers GF, Mulliken JB, Deutsch CK. 2008. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 45(3):232–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar