Challenges and motivation for teachers transitioning to active learning spaces

References

• Anderson, T. 2003. “Getting the mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 4 (2). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M. E., M. Graham, M. Prince, M. Borrego, C. J. Finelli, and J. Husman. 2020. “Student Resistance to Active Learning: Do Instructors (Mostly) get it Wrong?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 25 (2): 142–154. doi:10.1080/22054952.2020.1861771
   Google Scholar
• Apkarian, N., C. Henderson, M. Stains, J. Raker, E. Johnson, and M. Dancy. 2021. “What Really Impacts the use of Active Learning in Undergraduate STEM Education? Results from a National Survey of Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics Instructors.” PloS one 16 (2): e0247544. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. W. 1957. “Motivational Determinants of Risk-Taking Behavior.” Psychological Review 64 (6p1): 359–372. doi:10.1037/h0043445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avant, G. R., and K. P. Knutsen. 1993. “Understanding cultural differences: Janteloven and social conformity in Norway.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 50 (4): 449–460.
   Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., and J. D. Walker. 2014. “Active Learning Classrooms and Educational Alliances: Changing Relationships to Improve Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2014(137): 27–40. doi:10.1002/tl.20083
   Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., J. D. Walker, D. C. Brooks, K. Saichaie, and C. I. Petersen. 2016. A Guide to Teaching in the Active Learning Classroom: History, Research, and Practice. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, K. 2004. “What Makes Great Teachers Great?” Chronicle of Higher Education 50 (31): B7–B9.
   Google Scholar
• Barell, J. F. 2006. Problem-based Learning: An Inquiry Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. A. 2018. “Does Active Learning Work? A Good Question, but not the Right one.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 4 (4): 290–307. doi:10.1037/stl0000124
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., and J. A. Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C. 2011. “Space Matters: The Impact of Formal Learning Environments on Student Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (5): 719–726. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C., and C. A. Solheim. 2014. “Pedagogy Matters, Too: The Impact of Adapting Teaching Approaches to Formal Learning Environments on Student Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 137: 53–61. doi:10.1002/tl.20085
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N., and K. Fraser. 2014. “Factors That Shape Pedagogical Practices in Next Generation Learning Spaces.” In The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces, edited by K. Fraser, 175–198. Published Online: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., S. G. Buzinski, E. Armstrong-Carter, J. Clark, B. Buck, and L. Reuman. 2019. “Think, Pair, Freeze: The Association Between Social Anxiety and Student Discomfort in the Active Learning Environment.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 5 (4): 265–277. doi:10.1037/stl0000147
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. H., and E. Mazur. 2001. “Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results.” American Journal of Physics 69: 970–977. doi:10.1119/1.1374249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancy, M. H., and C. Henderson. 2005. “Beyond the Individual Instructor: Systemic Constraints in the Implementation of Research-Informed Practices.” AIP Conf. Proc 790: 113–116. doi:10.1063/1.2084714
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, M., and C. Henderson. 2007. “Framework for Articulating Instructional Practices and Conceptions.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 3: 010103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010103
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K. Callaghan, and G. Kestin. 2019. “Measuring Actual Learning Versus Feeling of Learning in Response to Being Actively Engaged in the Classroom.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (39): 19251–19257. doi:10.1073/pnas.1821936116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman. 2011. “Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class.” Science 332: 862–864. doi:10.1126/science.1201783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., and C. Wieman. 2011. “Learning and Retention of Quantum Concepts with Different Teaching Methods.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 7: 010101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, S. W., and M. I. Brown. 2004. “Increasing Interactivity in Lectures Using an Electronic Voting System.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20: 81–94. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufresne, R. J., William J. Gerace, William J. Leonard, Jose P. Mestre, and Laura Wenk. 1996. “Classtalk: A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 7: 3–47. doi:10.1007/BF02948592.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., A. Wigfield, and U. Schiefele. 1998. Motivation to succeed.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Philadelphia, PA: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Fagen, A. P., C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur. 2002. “Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms.” The Physics Teacher 40: 206–209. doi:10.1119/1.1474140
   Google Scholar
• Fain, E. A., and B. Kennell. 2016. “Authentic Learning and Multifaceted Assessment Utilizing Interprofessional Collaborative Learning Events.” World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin 73: 52–56. doi:10.1080/14473828.2016.1152730
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M. 2007. “Random Thoughts: Sermons for Grumpy Campers.” Chemical Engineering Education 41: 183–184.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M. 2010. “Random Thoughts: The Link Between Teaching and Research. 2. How to Strengthen Each Without Weakening the Other.” Chemical Engineering Education 44: 213–214.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., and R. Brent. 1996. “Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction.” College Teaching 44: 43–47. doi:10.1080/87567555.1996.9933425
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, C. J., and M. Borrego. 2020. “Evidence-based Strategies to Reduce Student Resistance to Active Learning.” In Active Learning in College Science, edited by Joel J. Mintzes and Emily M. Walter, 943–952. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, C. J., K. Nguyen, M. DeMonbrun, M. Borrego, M. Prince, J. Husman, … C. K. Waters. 2018. “Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Strategies for Instructors.” Journal of College Science Teaching 47(5): 80–91. ISSN: 0047231X.
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, C. J., K. M. Richardson, and S. R. Daly. 2013. Factors That Influence Faculty Motivation of Effective Teaching Practices in Engineering. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23–590).
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, A., J. Ferris, C. Weston, and L. Winer. 2016. “Informed Principles for (re) Designing Teaching and Learning Spaces.” Journal of Learning Spaces 5 (1): 26–40. ISSN: 21586195.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. L., and B. J. Fraser. 1991. “School Climate and Teacher Professional Development.” South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 19: 17–32. doi:10.1080/0311213910190103
   Google Scholar
• Frank, B. W. 2020. “Engagement and joy in the Active Learning Classroom.” The Physics Teacher 58 (1): 76–76. doi:10.1119/1.5141986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. M., A. L. Timan, K. Miller, J. E. Dowd, L. Tucker, and E. Mazur. 2014. “Teaching and Physics Education Research: Bridging the gap.” Reports on Progress in Physics 77 (3): 032401. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/3/032401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froyd, J., M. Borrego, S. Cutler, M. Prince, and C. Henderson. 2014. “Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Electrical or Computer Engineering Courses.” IEEE Transactions on Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 1999. “Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 2 (2-3): 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R. 2022. Teaching Culture Survey - 2022 Findings. https://teachingcultures.com/resources/TCS-2022-amalgamated-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. 1998. “Interactive-engagement vs. Traditional Methods: A six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66: 64–74. doi:10.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, R. DeHaan, Jim Gentile, et al. 2004. “Scientific Teaching.” Science 304 (5670): 521–522. doi:10.1126/science.1096022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., and M. H. Dancy. 2007. “Barriers to the use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies: The Influence of Both Individual and Situational Characteristics.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 3: 020102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernik, J., and E. Jaworska. 2018. “The Effect of Enjoyment on Learning.” In INTED 2018 Proceedings, Valencia, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. W., M. P. Su, M. W. Blackburn, and C. J. Finelli. 2021. “Instructor use of a Flexible Classroom to Facilitate Active Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Courses.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (4): 618–635. doi:10.1080/03043797.2020.1865878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. K., and D. M. L. Fevre. 2021. “Increasing Teacher Engagement in Innovative Learning Environments: Understanding the Effects of Perceptions of Risk.” In Teacher Transition Into Innovative Learning Environments, edited by W. Imms and T. Kvan, 73–83. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2009. “Action Research as a Practice-Based Practice.” Educational Action Research 17 (3): 463–474. doi:10.1080/09650790903093284
   Google Scholar
• Kugel, P. 1993. “How Professors Develop as Teachers.” Studies in Higher Education 18 (3): 315–328. doi:10.1080/03075079312331382241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnskapsdepartementet. 2017. Norwegian White Paper: Kultur for kvalitet i høyere utdanning.
   Google Scholar
• Kvan, T., and K. Fisher. 2021. “Introduction to Part I: Change and Risk.” In Teacher Transition into Innovative Learning Environments, edited by W. Imms and T. Kvan, 27–31. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lasry, N., E. Charles, and C. Whittaker. 2014. “When Teacher-Centered Instructors are Assigned to Student-Centered Classrooms.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 10 (1): 010116. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010116
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., M. L. Hassi, M. Kogan, and T. J. Weston. 2014. “Benefits for Women and men of Inquiry-Based Learning in College Mathematics: A Multi-Institution Study.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 45 (4): 406–418. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., and C. Rasmussen. 2019. “I on the Prize: Inquiry Approaches in Undergraduate Mathematics.” International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education 5 (1): 129–146. doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W. S., X. W. Li, and Y. M. Zou. 2019. “The Formation of Teachers’ Intrinsic Motivation in Professional Development.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 53 (3): 418–430. doi:10.1007/s12124-018-9465-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., K. E. Stiles, S. Mundry, N. Love, and P. W. Hewson. 2009. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. 1997. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, C. D., T. McNally, and J. P. Hermon. 2011. “An Evaluation of Active Learning Strategies Applied to Engineering Mathematics.” In Proceeding of the 7th International CDIO Conference, edited by Martin Vigild, 20–23. DTU, Denmark: Proceeding of the 7th International CDIO Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. 2006. Where's the Evidence that Active Learning Works? Advances in physiology education.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T., and T. Anderson. 2010. The Interaction Equivalency Theorem.
   Google Scholar
• Morrone, A. S., J. A. Ouimet, G. Siering, and I. T. Arthur. 2014. “Coffeehouse as Classroom: Examination of a New Style of Active Learning Environment.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 137: 41–51. doi:10.1002/tl.20084
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., and J. T. Boyle. 2003. “Peer Instruction Versus Class-Wide Discussion in Large Classes: A Comparison of two Interaction Methods in the Wired Classroom.” Studies in Higher Education 28: 457–473. doi:10.1080/0307507032000122297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. L., G. Hansen, and J. B. Stav. 2016. “How the Initial Thinking Period Affects Student Argumentation During Peer Instruction: Students’ Experiences Versus Observations.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (1): 124–138. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.915300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. 2006. Learning Spaces (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Educause.
   Google Scholar
• Øien, G. E. D., and N. R. Bodsberg. 2021. FTS delrapport 3: Visjon og anbefalte prinsipper. (In Norwegian). Retrieved from the FTS project’s website: https://www.ntnu.no/fremtidensteknologistudier.
   Google Scholar
• Øien, G. E. D., N. R. Bodsberg, and R. Lyng. 2022. Redesigning Norwegian Engineering Education 1: Benchmarking and Principles for Development. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, Hosted by Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland, June 13–15, 2022. (To be published).
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, F., D. Elliot, M. Hulme, and A. McPhee. 2010. “The Importance of Collegiality and Reciprocal Learning in the Professional Development of Beginning Teachers.” Journal of Education for Teaching 36 (3): 277–289. doi:10.1080/02607476.2010.497373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, C. I., and K. S. Gorman. 2014. “Strategies to Address Common Challenges When Teaching in an Active Learning Classroom.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 137: 63–70. doi:10.1002/tl.20086
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. 2007. Interaktiv Aksjonsforskning: Forskere og Praktikere i Gjensidige Bytteforhold. Pages 12–34 in Forsk Med. Editor Postholm, M. F.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3): 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaheim, A., G. Grepperud, T. Olsson, K. Winka, and A. Pasteur Stø. 2020. Evaluering av NTNUs system for utdanningsfaglig merittering.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, J. S. 1995. “Active Learning Strategies in Advanced Mathematics Classes.” Studies in Higher Education 20 (2): 223–228. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverthorn, D. U., P. M. Thorn, and M. D. Svinicki. 2006. “It’s Difficult to Change the way we Teach: Lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology Curriculum Module Project.” Advances in Physiology Education 30: 204–214. doi:10.1152/advan.00064.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorcinelli, M. D. 2002. Ten principles of good practice in creating and sustaining teaching and learning centers. A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources, 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, L., M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan. 1999. “Effects on Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 69 (1): 21–21. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stains, M., J. Harshman, M. K. Barker, S. V. Chasteen, R. Cole, S. E. DeChenne-Peters, M. K. Eagan, et al. 2018. “Anatomy of STEM Teaching in North American Universities.” Science 359 (6383): 1468–1470. doi:10.1126/science.aap8892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousands Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. S. 2009. “Effects of Studio Space on Teaching and Learning: Preliminary Findings from two Case Studies.” Innovative Higher Education 33 (4): 217–228. doi:10.1007/s10755-008-9079-7
   Google Scholar
• Tharayil, S., M. Borrego, M. Prince, K. A. Nguyen, P. Shekhar, C. J. Finelli, and C. Waters. 2018. “Strategies to Mitigate Student Resistance to Active Learning.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trees, A. R., and M. H. Jackson. 2007. “The Learning Environment in Clicker Classrooms: Student Process of Learning and Involvement in Large University-Level Courses Using Student Response Systems.” Learning, Media and Technology 32: 21–40. doi:10.1080/17439880601141179
   Google Scholar
• Turpen, C., M. Dancy, and C. Henderson. 2010. “Faculty Perspectives on Using Peer Instruction: A National Study.” AIP Conference Proceedings 1289: 325–328. doi:10.1063/1.3515235
   Google Scholar
• Van Horne, S., C. T. Murniati, K. Saichaie, M. Jesse, J. C. Florman, and B. F. Ingram. 2014. “Using Qualitative Research to Assess Teaching and Learning in Technology-Infused TILE Classrooms.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 137: 17–26. doi:10.1002/tl.20082
   Google Scholar
• Vuorela, M., and L. Nummenmaa. 2004. “How Undergraduate Students Meet a new Learning Environment?” Computers in Human Behavior 20: 763–777. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. D., and P. Baepler. 2018. “Social Context Matters: Predicting Outcomes in Formal Learning Environments.” Journal of Learning Spaces 7 (2): 1–11. ISSN: 21586195.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2002. “The Development of Competence Beliefs, Expectancies for Success, and Achievement Values from Childhood Through Adolescence.” Development of Achievement Motivation, 91–120. doi:10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50006-1
   Google Scholar