701
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The metrification of teaching: student evaluation of teaching in the United States, Germany and Colombia

教学的尺度化: 美国、德国和哥伦比亚学生对教学的评价

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Akkreditierungsrat. 1999. “Verbesserung von Qualität in Lehre und Studium durch Akkreditierungsverfahren: Mindeststandards und Kriterien verabschiedet “, Accessed April 1 2020. http://typo3.akkreditierungsrat.de.
  • Allen, Drew, and Gregory C. Wolniak. 2018. “Exploring the Effects of Tuition Increases on Racial/Ethnic Diversity at Public Colleges and Universities.” Research in Higher Education 60 (1): 18–43. doi: 10.1007/s11162-018-9502-6.
  • American Association of University Professors. 1940/1978. “1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure.” AAUP Bulletin 64 (2): 108–112.
  • American Sociological Association. 2019. “Statement on Student Evaluations of Teaching.” Accessed September 22. https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/asa_statement_on_student_evaluations_of_teaching_sept52019.pdf.
  • Anderson, Kristin J. 2010. “Students’ Stereotypes of Professors: an Exploration of the Double Violations of Ethnicity and Gender.” Social Psychology of Education 13 (4): 459–472. doi: 10.1007/s11218-010-9121-3.
  • Armbrüster, Thomas, Johannes Banzhaf, and Lars Dingemann. 2010. Unternehmensberatung im öffentlichen Sektor. Institutionenkonflikt, Praktische Herausforderungen, Lösungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Bayern. 2006. Bayerisches Hochschulgesetz.
  • Bennett, Sheila K. 1982. “Student Perceptions of and Expectations for Male and Female Instructors: Evidence Relating to the Question of Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (2): 170–179. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.170.
  • Berlin. 2011. Berliner Hochschulgesetz.
  • Bocanegra Acosta, H. 2014. “La Flexibilización Laboral: Formas y Reformas en la Educación Pública.” Revista Republicana 16: 99–131.
  • Braun, Edith, Burkhard Gusy, Bernhard Leidner, and Bettina Hannover. 2008. “Das Berliner Evaluationsinstrument für Selbsteingeschätzte, Studentische Kompetenzen (BEvaKomp).” Diagnostica 54 (1): 30–42. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.54.1.30.
  • Brittingham, Barbara. 2009. “Accreditation in the United States: How did we get to Where we are?” New Directions for Higher Education 2009 (145): 7–27. doi: 10.1002/he.331.
  • Brunarski v. Miami Univ. 2018. Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-311, 3–20. Toronto: Southern Disctrict of Ohio Western Division.
  • Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2007. “Wissenschaftszeitvertragsgesetz.” In Wissenschaftszeitvertragsgesetz, edited by Bundesanzeigiger Verlag, 506–508. Bonn: Bundesamt für Justiz.
  • Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2014. Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn: Bundesamt für Justiz.
  • CFA/CSU. 2012. Collective Bargaining Agreement. Sacramento: The Board of Trustees of The California State University and The California Faculty Association.
  • Charle, Christophe. 2004. “Universities in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries (1800-1945).” In A History of the University in Europe, edited by Walter Rüegg, 33–80. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Congreso de Colombia. 1990. Ley 50 de 1990. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
  • Consejo Nacional de Acreditación. 2013. Lineamientos Para la Acreditación de Programas de Pregrado. Bogotá: CESU.
  • Consejo Nacional de Acreditación. 2014. Lineamientos Para la Acreditación Institucional. Bogotá: CESU.
  • Cowen, Robert. 1996. “Performativity, Post-Modernity and the University.” Comparative Education 32 (2): 245–258. doi: 10.1080/03050069628876.
  • Cowen, Robert. 2006. “Acting Comparatively upon the Educational World: Puzzles and Possibilities.” Oxford Review of Education 32 (5): 561–573. doi:10.1080/03054980600976155.
  • Deutscher Bundestag. 1976. “Hochschulrahmengesetz.” Bundesgesetzblatt 10 (29.01.1976).
  • Deutscher Bundestag. 1999. “Hochschulrahmengesetz.” Bundesgesetzblatt 3 (27.01.1999).
  • Drori, Gili S., and Markus A. Höllerer. 2014. Global Themes and Local Variations in Organization and Management: Perspectives on Glocalization. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2009. “Vergleichende Politische Soziologie: Quantitative Analyse- Oder Qualitative Fallstudiendesigns?” In Politische Soziologie, edited by Viktoria Kaina, and Andrea Römmele, 281–501. Wiesbaden: GWV Fachverlage.
  • Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Michael Sauder. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1–40. doi:10.1086/517897.
  • Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Mitchell L. Stevens. 2009. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology 49 (03). doi:10.1017/s0003975609000150.
  • Figueredo-Cowen, Maria. 2002. “Latin American Universities, Academic Freedom and Autonomy: A Long-Term Myth?” Comparative Education 38: 471–484.
  • Frank, David John, and John W. Meyer. 2020. The University and the Global Knowledge Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Gallistel, Randy. 1963. “Scratch Sheet to Appear Despite Official Wariness.” The Stanford Daily 142 (66): 2.
  • Garcia Garduno, J. M. E. 2014. “¿Para qué Sirve la Evaluación de la Docencia? Un Estudio Exploratorio de las Creencias de los Estudiantes Universitarios.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22 (15), doi:10.14507/epaa.v22n15.2014.
  • García, Martha Cecilia. 2001. “Luchas y Movimientos Cívicos en Colombia.” In Movimientos Sociales, Estado y Democracia en Colombia, edited by Mauricio Archila, and Mauricio Pardo, 88–124. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
  • Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz. 2014. “Bekanntmachung der Verwaltungsvereinbarung zwischen Bund und Ländern gemäß Artikel 91b Absatz 1 Nummer 2 des Grundgesetzes über den Hochschulpakt 2020 Hochschulpakt III.” Accessed June 20. https://www.bundesanzeiger.de/.
  • Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz. 2015. “Bekanntmachung der Verwaltungsvereinbarung zwischen Bund und Ländern gemäß Artikel 91b Absatz 1 Nummer 2 des Grundgesetzes über den Hochschulpakt 2020 (zweite Programmphase) Hochschulpakt II.” Accessed June 20. https://www.bundesanzeiger.de/.
  • Gray, Mary, and Barbara R. Bergmann. 2003. “Student Teaching Evaluations: Inaccurate, Demeaning, Misused.” Academe 89 (5): 44–46.
  • Hammond, Phillip E., John W. Meyer, and David Miller. 1969. “Teaching Versus Research: Sources of Misperceptions.” The Journal of Higher Education 40 (9): 682–690. doi:10.2307/1978138.
  • Hessen. 2009. Hessisches Hochschulgesetz.
  • Husbands, C. T., and P. Fosh. 1993. “Students’ Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Experiences from Four European Countries and Some Implications of the Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (2): 95–114. doi:10.1080/0260293930180202.
  • Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2014. “The Rise and Fall of Student Fees in a Federal Higher Education System: The Case of Germany.” In Students, Markets and Social Justice: Higher Education fee and Student Support Policies in Western Europe and Beyond, edited by Claire Depuy, and Hubert Ertl, 85–110. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2018. Higher Education in Germany – Recent Developments in an International Perspective. Cham: Springer.
  • ICEland. 2020. “Information, Controlling Entscheidung.” Accessed March 10. https://iceland.dzhw.eu/.
  • IPEDS. 2020. “Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System.” Accessed February 25. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data.
  • Kehm, Barbara M. 2007. “Quo Vadis Doctoral Education? New European Approaches in the Context of Global Changes.” European Journal of Education 42 (3): 307–319.
  • Kehm, Barbara M. 2013. “To Be or Not to Be? The Impacts of the Excellence Initiative on the German System of Higher Education.” In Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition, edited by Jung Cheol Shin, and Barbara M. Kehm, 81–98. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Krücken, Georg. 2019. “Multiple Competitions in Higher Education: a Conceptual Approach.” Innovation 23 (2): 1–19. doi:10.1080/14479338.2019.1684652.
  • Krücken, Georg, and Frank Meier. 2006. “Turning the University Into an Organizational Actor.” In Globalization and Orgnization: World Society and Organizational Change, edited by Gili S. Drori, John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang, 241–258. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kwak, Naejin, Gabriela Gavrila, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2019. “Enacting Diversity in American Higher Ducation: Reputation and Professionalization.” In Universities as Agencies, edited by Tom Christensen, Åse Gornitzka, and Francisco O. Ramirez, 209–228. New York: Universities as Agencies: Reputation and Professionalization.
  • Lerch, Julia C., Patricia Bromley, Francisco O. Ramirez, and John W. Meyer. 2016. “The Rise of Individual Agency in Conceptions of Society: Textbooks Worldwide, 1950–2011.” International Sociology 32 (1): 38–60. doi:10.1177/0268580916675525.
  • Levy, Daniel C. 1986. Higher Education and the State in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Maguire, Meg, Stephen J. Ball, and Annette Braun. 2013. “What Ever Happened to … ? ‘Personalised Learning’ as a Case of Policy Dissipation.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (3): 322–338. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.724714.
  • Marsh, Herbert W. 1986. “Applicability Paradigm: Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness in Different Countries.” Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (6): 465–473. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.6.465.
  • Mau, Stefen. 2017. Das Metrische Wir - Über die Quantifizierung des Sozialen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
  • Mayer, Karl Ulrich. 2016. “Die Drei Pakte und Ihre Wirkung: Die Exzellenzinitiative, der Hochschulpakt 2020 und der Pakt für Forschung und Innovation.” In Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik, edited by Dagmar Simon, Andreas Knie, Stefan Hornbostel, and Karin Zimmermann, 465–483. Wiesbaden: Springer.
  • Meyer, Heinz-Dieter. 2016. The Design of the University: German, American, and “World Class”. New York: Routledge.
  • Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.
  • Meyer, John W., and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2013. “Universalizing the University in a World Society.” In Institutionalization of World Class University in Global Competition, edited by Jung Cheol Shin, and Barbara Kehm, 257–274. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363
  • Mill, John Stuart. 1843. /1974. System of Logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Routledge.
  • Ministerio de Educación Nacional. 2002. Decreto 1279 de 2002. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional.
  • Ministerio de Educación Nacional. 2019. “Sistema Nacional de Evaluación Docente en Educación Superior.” Accessed December 10. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-296713.html.
  • Pineda, Pedro. 2015. The Entrepreneurial Research University In Latin America: Global and Local Models In Chile and Colombia, 1950–2015. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pineda, Pedro, and Jorge Enrique Celis. 2017. “¿Hacia la universidad corporativa? Reformas basadas en el mercado e isomorfismo institucional en Colombia”. Education Policy Analysis Archives 25 (71). doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2837.
  • Pineda, Pedro, and Isabel Steinhardt. 2020. “The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions.” Teaching in Higher Education: 1–21. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351.
  • Pineda, Pedro, and Seidenschnur Tim. 2021. “Translating Student Evaluation of Teaching: How Discourse and Cultural Environments Pressure Rationalizing Procedures.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1889491.
  • Presidencia de la República. 1992. Decreto 1444 de 1992. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional.
  • Presidencia de la República. 2001. Decreto 2912 de 2001. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional.
  • Ramirez, Francisco O. 2010. “Accounting for Excellence: Transforming Universities Into Organizational Actors.” In Higher Education, Policy, and the Global Competition Phenomenon, edited by Laura M. Portnoi, Val D. Rust, and Sylvia S. Bagley, 43–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ramirez, Francisco O. 2012. “The World Society Perspective: Concepts, Assumptions, and Strategies.” Comparative Education 18 (4): 423–439.
  • Ramirez, Francisco O., and Dijana Tiplic. 2013. “In Pursuit of Excellence? Discursive Patterns in European Higher Education Research.” Higher Education 67: 439–455.
  • Reinholz, Daniel L., Joel C. Corbo, Daniel J. Bernstein, and Noah D. Finkelstein. 2018. “Evaluating Scholarly Teaching: A Model and Call for an Evidence-Based Approach.” In Learning Analytics in Higher Education: Current Innovations, Future Potential, and Practical Applications, edited by Jaime Lester, Carrie Klein, Aditya Johri, and Huzefa Rangwala, 69–92. New York: Routledge.
  • República de Colombia. 1992. “Ley 30 de diciembre 28 de 1992 por el cual se organiza el servicio público de la educación superior.” In. Bogotá.
  • Rindermann, Heiner, and Manfred Amelang. 1994. Das Heidelberger Inventar zur Lehrveranstaltungs-Evaluation (HILVE). Heidelberg: Asanger.
  • Ryerson Univ v. Ryerson Fac Assoc. 2018. In the Matter of an Interest Arbitration, 1–12. Toronto: Canadian Legal Information Institute.
  • Schofer, Evan, Francisco O. Ramirez, and John W. Meyer. 2021. “The Societal Consequences of Higher Education.” Sociology of Education 94 (1). doi:10.1177/0038040720942912.
  • Seidenschnur, Tim, Georg Krücken, Julia Galwa, and Rick Vogel. 2018. "Berater im Spiegel des Feldes. Eine professionssoziologische Rekonstruktion ihrer Legitimierung in Verwaltungen und Universitäten." Soziale Welt 69 (1): 6–32. doi: 10.5771/0038-6073-2018-1-6.
  • SNIES. 2020. “Sistema Nacional de Información de Educación Superior.” Accessed March 31. www.mineducacion.gov.co/snies/.
  • Sproule, R. 2000. “Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Methodological Critique of Conventional Practices.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 8: 1–23.
  • Statistisches Bundesamt. 2020. “Hochschulpersonal nach Bundesländern und Personalgruppen.” Accessed June 11 2020. https://www.destatis.de.
  • Thelin, John R. 2011. A History of American Higher Education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • The Stanford Daily 1958. “Sibley Petition Ruled 'Out of Order'.” 133 (59): 2–2.
  • The Stanford Daily. 1959. Education Requires Reappraisal 135 (17): 1–1.
  • Turner, George. 2001. Hochschule Zwischen Vorstellung und Wirklichkeit Zur Geschichte der Hochschulreform im Letzten Drittel des 20. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt.
  • University of Southern California. 2019. “Teaching Evaluations Update.” Accessed January 31 2019. https://academicsenate.usc.edu/teaching-evaluations-update/.
  • Uttl, B., K. Cnudde, and C. A. White. 2019. “Conflict of Interest Explains the Size of Student Evaluation of Teaching and Learning Correlations in Multisection Studies: a Meta-Analysis.” PeerJ 7: e7225. doi:10.7717/peerj.7225.
  • Uttl, B., and D. Smibert. 2017. “Student Evaluations of Teaching: Teaching Quantitative Courses Can be Hazardous to One's Career.” PeerJ 2017 (5). doi:10.7717/peerj.3299.
  • Weber, Max. 1919/1930. Wissenschaft als Beruf. München: Duncker & Humblot.
  • Weiler, Hans N. 1989. “Why Reforms Fail: the Politics of Education in France and the Federal Republic of Germany.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 21 (4): 291–305. doi:10.1080/0022027890210401.
  • Wilkesmann, Uwe, and Christian J. Schmid. 2011. "The Impacts of New Governance on Teaching at German Universities. Findings from a National Survey." Higher Education 63 (1): 33–52. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9423-1.
  • Witzel, Andreas. 2000. “The Problem-Centered Interview.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (1): 1–9.
  • Wolbring, Tobias. 2010. “Attraktivität, Geschlecht und Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation: Eine Replikationsstudie zu den Befunden von Hamermesh und Parker (2005) und Klein und Rosar (2006) mit Hilfe von Individualdaten.” Zeitschrift für Evaluation 9 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9452-4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.