The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s

References

• Alexander, R. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching. York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Amidon, E., & Hunter, E. (1967). Improving teaching: The analysis of classroom verbal interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, O. (1978). The sociology of education: A bibliography. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., Britton, J., Rosen, H., & English, L. (1969). Language, the learner and the school. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and action. Vol. 3: Towards a theory of educational transmissions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., Carter, S., Christian, B., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. (1978). Vygotsky’s contribution to pedagogical theory. English in Education, 21, 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, co-operative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 393–453). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock Report (1975). A language for life: Report of the Committee of Enquiry appointed by the Secretary of State for Education and Science under the chairmanship of Sir Alan Bullock FBA. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. (Ed.). (1972). The functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C., Anderson, R., & Waggoner, M. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coultas, V. (2006). Talking and learning in challenging classrooms: Strategies for behaviour management and talk-based tasks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, B. (1991). Cox on Cox: An English curriculum for the 1990s. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Creese, A. (2008). Linguistic ethnography. In K. A. King, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd edn, Volume 10: Research methods in language and education (pp. 229–241). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, L. (2004). Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 667–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (revised ed.). Boston, MA: D. C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, C., & Green, J. (2005). Studying the discursive construction of texts in classrooms through interactional ethnography. In R. Beach, J. L. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 349–390). Cresshill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. D., & Furlong, V. J. (1978). The language of teaching. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987/2012). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. D., & Westgate, D. (1994). Investigating classroom talk (2nd ed.). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analysing teacher behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Pell, T., & Wall, D. (1999). Inside the primary classroom: 20 years on. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., Simon, B., & Croll, P. (1980). Inside the primary classroom (the ORACLE Project). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1974). The origins of the term ‘ethnomethodology’. In R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology: selected readings (pp. 15–18). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., & Green, J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldacre, B. (2013). Building evidence into education. Retrieved from http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/b/ben%20goldacre%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. (2013, 5 September). Michael Gove speaks about the importance of teaching. Speech retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speaks-about-the-importance-of-teaching
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., & Wallat, C. (Eds.). (1981). Ethnography and language in educational settings. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, F., Smith, F., & Wall, K. (2003). ‘Interactive Whole Class Teaching’ in the National Literacy Strategy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 197–215.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. (1984). Teachers’ questions: Open, closed and half-open. Educational Research, 26, 46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (2012). Words at work and play: Three decades of family and community life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 325–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILEA (1984). Improving secondary schools (Report of the Committee on the Curriculum and Organization of Secondary Schools). London: Inner London Education Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, C., & Issitt, J. (2008). What characterizes effective teacher–pupil dialogue to promote conceptual understanding in mathematics lessons in England in Key Stages 2 and 3? (EPPI-Centre Report no. 1604R). London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 33–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2009). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Edwards, D. (1981). Ground rules for mutual understanding: A social psychological approach to classroom knowledge. In N. Mercer (Ed.) Language in school and community (pp. 30–46). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring talk in school. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, F. (1999). Judging a word by the company it keeps: The use of concordancing software to explore aspects of the mathematics register. Language and Education, 13, 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in science classrooms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. A., Jones, S., & Hopper, R. (2005). Talking, listening, learning: Effective talk in the primary classroom. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, K. (Ed.). (1992). Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Wu, L., Gamorgan, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35, 135–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2004). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., & Asoko, H. (2006). Talk in science classrooms. In V. Wood-Robinson (Ed.) ASE Guide to Secondary Science Education (pp. 55–73). Hatfield: Association for Science Education (ASE).
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spindler, G. (1982). Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (1983). Language, schools and classrooms. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). Using computer-based text analysis to integrate quantitative and qualitative methods in the investigation of collaborative learning. Language and Education, 11, 271–286.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1978). Talking with children: The complementary roles of parents and teachers. English in Education, 12, 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., & Ball, T. (2008). Exploratory talk and dialogic inquiry. In N. Mercer, & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in schools (pp. 167–184). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, A. (1970). The concept of oracy. The English Journal, 59, 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. (1992). Teaching talk. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 203–214). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Ziechner, K. (1994). Research on teacher thinking and different views of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage, Teachers’ minds and actions; Research on teachers’ thinking and practice (pp. 9–27). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar