Explaining social class inequalities in educational achievement in the UK: quantifying the contribution of social class differences in school ‘effectiveness’

References

• Allen, R. (2007). Allocating pupils to their nearest secondary school: The consequences for social and ability stratification. Urban Studies, 44, 751–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A., Gregg, P., & McConnell, B. (2006). The result of 11 plus selection: An investigation into equity and efficiency of outcomes for pupils in selective LEAs (Centre for Markets and Public Organisation Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 06/150). Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P. (2012). Three generations of research on class-size effects. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 530–554). Washington, DC: US American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., & Goodman, A. (2011). The role of attitudes and behaviours in explaining socio-economic differences in attainment at age 16. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2, 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• CMPO Research Team. (2006). Up to age 7: Family background and child development up to age 7 in the Avon Longitudinal Survey of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) (Department for Education and Skills Research Report RR808A). London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• DCSF. (2008a). Youth cohort study & longitudinal study of young people in England: The activities and experiences of 16 year olds: England 2007. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• DCSF. (2008b). Statistical bulletin: The composition of schools in England. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2012, January). Statistical first release: Schools, pupils, and their characteristics. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dolton, P., & Newson, D. (2003). The relationship between teacher turnover and school performance. London Review of Education, 1, 132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., & Machin, S. (2003). Valuing English primary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., & Silva, O. (2011). Faith primary schools: Better schools or better pupils? Journal of Labor Economics, 29, 589–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2010). Multilevel statistical models. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., Burgess, S., & McConnell, B. (2007). Modelling the effect of pupil mobility on school differences in educational achievement. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170, 941–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Sammons, P. (1997). The influence of secondary and junior schools on sixteen year examination performance: A cross-classified multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. (2010). Serious doubts about school effectiveness. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 745–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, P., & Washbrook, E. (2011). The role of attitudes and behaviours in explaining socio-economic differences in attainment at age 11. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, A. F., & Britten, N. (1984). Women’s jobs do make a difference: A reply to Goldthorpe. Sociology, 18, 475–490.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, G. (2007). Investigating social class inequalities in educational attainment (PhD thesis). Institute of Education, University of London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Holmlund, H., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2008). Impact of school resources on attainment at Key Stage 2 (Department for Children, Schools and Families Research Report DCSF-RR043). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., Levăcić, R., & Vignoles, A. (2006). Estimating the relationship between school resources and pupil attainment at GCSE (Department for Education and Skills Research Report RR727). London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J., & Bartlett, W. (1993). Introduction. In J. Le Grand & W. Bartlett (Eds.), Quasi-markets and social policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Levăcić, R., Jenkins, A., Vignoles, A., Steele, F., & Allen, R. (2005). Estimating the relationship between school resources and pupil attainment at Key Stage 3 (Department for Education and Skills Research Report RR679). London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N., Cresswell, J., & Ainley, J. (2006). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement: The role of home and school factors. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 12, 105–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Wells: Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, T. G., Thorpe, K., Dunn, J., Golding, J., & the ALSPAC Study Team (1999). Parental divorce and adjustment in adulthood: Findings from a community sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 777–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, G., Mangan, J., & Gray, J. (2011). Do increased resources increase educational attainment during a period of rising expenditure? Evidence from English secondary schools using a dynamic panel analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 163–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QCA. (1998). Assessment and reporting arrangements: Key Stage 1 (1999). London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• QCA. (2002). Assessment and reporting arrangements: Key Stage 2 (2003). London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. (1995). A report on phase 1 of the ESRC review of OPCS social classifications. Swindon: ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & O’Reilly, K. (1998). The ESRC review of Government social classifications. Swindon: ESRC and Government Statistical Service.
   Google Scholar
• Sacker, A., Schoon, I., & Bartley, M. (2002). Social inequality in educational achievement and psychological adjustment throughout childhood: Magnitude and mechanisms. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 863–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibieta, L., Chowdry, H., & Muriel, A. (2006). Level playing field? The implications of school funding (CfBT Education Trust Research Paper). Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, H., Davies, N. M., & Burgess, S. (2012). Do teachers matter? Measuring the variation in teacher effectiveness in England. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74, 629–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithers, A. & Robinson, P. (2004). Teacher turnover, wastage and destinations (Department for Education and Skills Research Report RR553). London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, S. (2010). Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness by ethnicity, gender, poverty, and prior achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 21, 289–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. (2014a). Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: Intersectionality and ‘getting it’ for the white working class. Research Papers in Education, 29, 131–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. (2014b). School effects and ethnic, gender and socio-economic gaps in educational achievement at age 11. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 223–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., & Heath, A. F. (2004). Students’ academic attainments at British state and private schools (Sociology Working Papers, Paper Number 2002-02). Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• van Ewijk, R., & Sleegers, P. (2010). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5, 134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washbrook, E., Gregg, P., & Propper, C. (2013). A decomposition analysis of the relationship between parental income and multiple child outcomes (Centre for Markets and Public Organisation Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 13/313). Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• West, A., Barham, E., & Hind, A. (2011). Secondary school admissions in England 2001 to 2008: Changing legislation, policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 37, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar