https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-7954
References
- Albornoz, F., Contreras, D., & Upward, R. (2023). Let’s stay together: The effects of repeat student-teacher matches on academic achievement. Economics of Education Review, 94, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102375
- Atteberry, A., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2017). Teacher churning: Reassignment rates and implications for student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716659929
- Cistone, P., & Shneyderman, A. (2004). Looping: An Empirical Evaluation. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice: Reconceptualizing Childhood Studies, 5(1), 47–61. https://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.caddogap.com%2Fperiodicals.shtml
- Education Endowment Foundation. (2023). One to one tuition. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit/one-to-one-tuition
- Franz, D. P., Thompson, N. L., Fuller, B., Hare, R. D., Miller, N. C., & Walker, J. (2010). Evaluating mathematics achievement of middle school students in a looping environment. School Science and Mathematics, 110(6), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00038.x
- Gorard, S. (2015). Rethinking ‘quantitative’ methods and the development of new researchers. Review of Education, 3(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3041
- Grissom, J. A., Kalogrides, D. & Loeb, S.(2015). The micropolitics of educational inequality: The case of Teacher–Student assignments. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(5), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1087768
- Hegde, A. V. & Cassidy, D. J. (2004). Teacher and parent perspectives on looping. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-004-1080-x
- Hill, A. J., & Jones, D. B. (2018). A teacher who knows me: The academic benefits of repeat student-teacher matches. Economics of Education Review, 64, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.004
- Hwang, N., Kisida, B., & Koedel, C. (2021). A familiar face: Student-teacher rematches and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 85, 102194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102194
- Menzies, L. (2023). Continuity and churn: Understanding and responding to the impact of teacher turnover. London Review of Education, 21(1).
- Nichols, J. D. & Nichols, G. W. (2003). The impact of looping classroom environments on parental attitudes. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children & Youth, 47(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880309604424
- OECD. (2021). Global teaching InSights technical documents. Retrived from https://www.oecd.org/education/school/global-teaching-insights-technical-documents.htm
- Ost, B., & Schiman, J. C. (2015). Grade-specific experience, grade reassignments, and teacher turnover. Economics of Education Review, 46, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.03.004
- Tourigny, R., Plante, I., & Raby, C. (2020). Do students in a looping classroom get higher grades and report a better teacher-student relationship than those in a traditional setting? Educational Studies, 46(6), 744–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1663152
- Wedenoja, L., Papay, J., & Kraft, M. A. (2022). Second time’s the charm? How sustained relationships from repeat student-teacher matches build academic and behavioral skills. (EdWorkingPaper: 22-590). https://doi.org/10.26300/sddw-ag22