48,589
Views
112
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Turning difficulties into possibilities: engaging Roma families and students in school through dialogic learning

&
Pages 451-465 | Received 11 Sep 2012, Accepted 20 Jun 2013, Published online: 30 Jul 2013

References

  • Anyon, J. (1995). Inner city school reform: Toward useful theory. Urban Education, 30, 56–70.
  • Aubert, A. (2011). Moving beyond social exclusion through dialogue. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21, 63–75.
  • Bhopal, K. (2004). Gypsy travellers and education: Changing needs and changing perceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52, 47–64.
  • Bhopal, K. (2011). ‘This is a school, it’s not a site’: Teachers’ attitudes towards Gypsy and Traveller pupils in schools in England, UK. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 465–483.
  • Bhopal, K., & Myers, M. (2009). Gypsy, Roma and Traveller pupils in schools in the UK: Inclusion and ‘good practice’. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13, 299–314.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25, 5–17.
  • Dearing, E., Kreider, H., Simpkins, S., & Weiss, H.B. (2006). Family involvement in school and low-income children’s literacy: Longitudinal associations between and within families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 653–664.
  • Derrington, C. (2005). Perceptions of behaviour and patterns of exclusion: Gypsy Traveller students in English secondary schools. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 5, 55–61.
  • Derrington, C. (2007). Fight, flight and playing white: An examination of coping strategies adopted by Gypsy Traveller Adolescents in English secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 357–367.
  • Epstein, J.L. (1991). Effects on student achievement of teachers practices of parent involvement. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 5, 261–276.
  • European Commission (2010). Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Commission (2011). Tackling early school leaving: A key contribution to the Europe 2020 agenda. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Flecha, A. (2012). Family Education Improve Student’s Academic Performance: Contributions from European Research. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 3, 301–321.
  • Flecha, A., García, R., Gómez, A., & Latorre, A. (2009). Participación en escuelas de éxito: Una investigación comunicativa del proyecto INCLUD-ED. Cultura y Educación, 21, 183–196.
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
  • Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the heart. New York: Continuum.
  • Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., & Pell, T. (2009). Group work and whole-class teaching with 11 to 14 year-olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 119–140.
  • García, R. (2012). Out of the ghetto psychological basis of dialogic learning. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 51–69.
  • Gómez, A., Racionero, S., & Sordé, T. (2010). Ten years of critical communicative methodology. International Review of Qualitative Research, 3, 17–43.
  • Gómez, J., & Vargas, J. (2003). Why Romà do not like mainstream schools: Voices of a people without territory. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 559–590.
  • Greenberg, J. (2010). Report on Roma education today: From slavery to segregation and beyond. Columbia Law Review, 110, 919–1001.
  • Greenfields, M., & Ryder, A. (2012). Research with and for Gypsies, Roma and Travellers: Combining policy, practice and community in action research. In: J. Richardson & A. Tsang (Eds.), Gypsies and Travellers (pp. 151–167). Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. V. 1. reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Hancock, I. (1988). Reunification and the role of international Romani union. Roma, 29, 9–19.
  • Hill, N.E., & Taylor, L.C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 161–164.
  • Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
  • Oliver, E., & Gatt, S. (2010). De los actos comunicativos de poder a los actos comunicativos dialógicos en las aulas organizadas en grupos interactivos. Signos, 43, 279–294.
  • Padros, M., Garcia, R., de Mello, R., & Molina, S. (2011). Contrasting scientific knowledge with knowledge from the lifeworld: The dialogic inclusion contract. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 304–312.
  • Puigvert, L., Christou, M., & Holford, J. (2012). Critical Communicative Methodology: including vulnerable voices in research through dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 513–526.
  • Rogoff, B., Goodman Turkanis, C., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Roma Education Fund (2010). Annual report 2010. Romania: Roma Education Fund.
  • Rose, R. (1983). Sinti and Roma in Germany. Roma, 7, 21–24.
  • Sheldon, S.B., & Epstein, J.L. (2005). Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 196–206.
  • Tellado, I., & Sava, S. (2010). The role on non-expert adult guidance in the dialogic construction of knowledge. Journal of Psychodidactics, 15, 163–176.
  • Valls, R., & Padrós, M. (2011). Using dialogic research to overcome poverty: From principles to action. European Journal of Education, 46, 173–183.
  • Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, W. (2003). Race, class and urban poverty: A rejoinder. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 26, 1096–1114.