The effects of scientific representations on primary students’ development of scientific discourse and conceptual understandings during cooperative contemporary inquiry-science

References

• Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.10.1126/science.1204153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alozie, N., Moje, E., & Krajcik, J. (2011). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussions in high school project-based science. Science & Education, 94, 395–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2011). Australian Curriculum-Science. http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum_1/learning_areas/science.html
   Google Scholar
• Australian Academy of Science. (2009). Primary connections. Canberra, ACT: Australian Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science & Education, 84, 577–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (2006). Enhancing science teaching and student learning: A BSCS perspective. Proceedings of the ACER Research Conference: Boosting science learning: What it will take. ACER research conference. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35. http://www.acer.edu.au/research_conferences/2006.html
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, J., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2008). Using representations for teaching and learning science. Teaching Science, 54, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C., & Clark, D. (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314–332). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 230–284.10.1080/10508400903530036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, J., & Enyedy, N. (2007). Negotiated representational mediators: How young children decide what to include in their science representations. Science & Education, 91, 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293–331.10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11625.html
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, W., & Kennedy, T. (2013). An applied reference guide to research designs; Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 35–49.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00072-7
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. (2004). The effects of communication training on teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 257–279.10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. (2011). Promoting thinking, problem-solving and reasoning during small group discussions. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 73–89.10.1080/13540602.2011.538498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R., & Haynes, M. (2011). Increasing explanatory behaviour, problem-solving and reasoning within classes using cooperative group work. Instructional Science, 39, 349–366.10.1007/s11251-010-9130-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R., & Khan, A. (2008). The effects of teacher discourse on students’ discourse, problem-solving and reasoning during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 323–340.10.1016/j.ijer.2008.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R., & Khan, A. (2009). Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 7–27.10.1080/03057640802701945
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2012). The effects of two meta-cognitive questioning approaches on children’s explanatory behaviour, problem-solving, and learning during cooperative, inquiry-based science. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 93–106. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.02.00310.1016/j.ijer.2012.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2005). Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold, Holder Headline Group.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrum, D., Rennie, L., & Hackling, M. (2001). Science in Australian primary schools: A report card investigating. Australian Primary and Junior Science Journal, 17, 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guastello, E., Beasley, T., & Sinatra, R. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 356–364.10.1177/074193250002100605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 24, 407–419.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackling, M. (2008). An overview of primary connections: Stage 3 research outcomes 2006–2008 (pp. 19). Canberra: Australian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S., & Palincsar, A. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children’s scientific inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 455–505.10.1207/s15327809jls1304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze-Fry, J., & Novak, J. (1990). Concept mapping brings long-term movement towards meaningful learning. Science & Education, 74, 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrenkohl, L., Tasker, T., & White, B. (2011). Pedagogical practices to support classroom cultures of scientific inquiry. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 1–44.10.1080/07370008.2011.534309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 23–48.10.1007/BF02319856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 121–145). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3613-2
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212–218.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T., Hsu, Y., Lin, S., Changlai, M., Yang, K., & Lai, T. (2012). A review of empirical evidence on scaffolding for science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, F., & Schneider, D. (2013). Good student questions in inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education, 47, 166–174.10.1080/00219266.2013.821749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 2002, 55–71.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198.10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008a). Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development, 51, 90–100.10.1159/000113158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008b). Changing our minds: A commentary on conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 351–362.10.1007/s11422-008-9099-8
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). (2008). Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. http://www.acara.edu.au/assessment/assessment.html
   Google Scholar
• Nesbit, J., & Adesope, O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.10.3102/00346543076003413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, K., Hanan, J., & Ranasinghe, M. (2013). Transforming the social practices of learning with representations: A study of disciplinary discourse. Research in Science Education, 43, 179–208.10.1007/s11165-011-9263-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, K., Ranasinghe, M., & Hanan, J. (2013). Translating between representations in a social context: A study of undergraduate science students’ representational fluency. Instructional Science, 41, 699–728.10.1007/s11251-012-9253-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science & Education, 87, 224–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton-Meier, L., Hockenberry, L., Nelson, S., & Wise, K. (2008). Transforming pedagogy: Embedding language practices within elementary science classrooms. In B. Hand (Ed.), Science inquiry, argument and language (pp. 25–36). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J., Gowin, B., & Johansen, G. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school students. Science & Education, 67, 625–645.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2006). Towards a science education for all: The role of ideas, evidence and argument. Proceedings of the ACER Research Conference: Boosting Science Learning: What it will take (pp. 2–5). Australian Council of Educational Research Conference. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2006/
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework for representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2751–2773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2010). Representing science literacies: An introduction. Research in Science Education, 40, 1–3.10.1007/s11165-009-9153-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2005). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. (2005). Science awareness and scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 51, 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Glina, M., Carolan, B., Michaud, O., Rogers, J., & Sequeira, L. (2012). Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 288–306.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R., Turner, T., & Hadar, L. (2009). Uncovering students’ thinking about thinking using concept maps. Metacognition Learning, 4, 145–159.10.1007/s11409-009-9040-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, K., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science & Education, 98, 305–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowbridge, L., Bybee, R., & Powell, J. (2004). Teaching secondary school science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging the students in science for Australia’s future. Australian education review. Camberwell, Vic: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. (2012). Socio-scientific issues, sustainability and science education. Research in Science Education, 42, 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing representations to learn science. Rotterdam: Sense .
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G., & Dawson, V. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on Grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 952–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1–28.10.1348/000709908X380772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, G., Chudinova, E., & Khavkin, E. (1998). Inquiry as a pivotal element of know-ledge acquisition within the Vygotskian paradigm: Building a science curriculum for the elementary school. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 201–233.10.1207/s1532690xci1602_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar