The physical placement of classroom technology and its influences on educational practices

References

• Amedeo, D., & Dyck, J. A. (2003). Activity-enhances arenas of designs: A case study of the classroom layout. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20, 323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betoret, F. D., & Artiga, A. G. (2004). Trainee teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, classroom layout and exam design. Educational Studies, 30, 355–372.10.1080/0305569042000310309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds.). (1992). Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. D. (2010). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 719–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R., Fuller, A., & Waters, J. (2012). Changing spaces of education: New perspectives on the nature of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2008). School. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, D. L., & Higgs, J. R. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education: Current status. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 385–395.10.2190/C770-AWA1-CMQR-YTYV
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. (2005). Research into identifying effective learning environments. Evaluating Quality in Educational Facilities, 9, 159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2010). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Information Technologies, 15, 205–217.10.1007/s10639-009-9106-z
   Google Scholar
• Herman, F., Van Gorp, A., Simon, F., Vanobbergen, B., Depaepe, M. (2011). Modern architecture meets new education. Renaat Braem’s design and the Brussels Decrolyschool (1946). Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis, XLI, 135–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51, 1499–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzberger, H. (2008). Space and learning. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• van Kooten, T. (1988). Ruimte op school [Space in school buildings]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• de Koster, S., Volman, M., & Kuiper, E. (2013). Interactivity with the interactive whiteboard in traditional and innovative primary schools: An exploratory study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 480–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., & Searson, M. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of technology integration in educational settings: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 463–473.10.1111/jcal.2013.29.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn, M., & Grosvenor, I. (2005). Materialities of schooling: Design, technology, objects, routines. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, F. V., O’Halloran, K. L., & Podlasov, A. (2012). Spatial pedagogy: Mapping meanings in the use of classroom space. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 235–251.10.1080/0305764X.2012.676629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2014). Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: Exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23, 57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. H. (2002). The classroom environment and its effects on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 139–156.10.1006/jevp.2001.0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, E. M., Higgins, S. E., & Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2014). The effects of room design on computer-supported collaborative learning in a multi-touch classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19.10.1080/10494820.2014.881392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 425–439.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38, 303–319.10.1080/03057640802287564
   Google Scholar
• Pynoo, B., Kerckaert, S., Goeman, K., Elen, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). MICTIVO: Monitoring ICT integration in Flemish education: Theoretical background and set-up. 15th biennial EARLI conference for research on learning and instruction (EARLI-2013).
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, D. (2008). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. Paper presented at the Learning Spaces in Higher Education: Positive Outcomes by Design: Proceedings of the Next Generation Learning Spaces 2008 Colloquium, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, A. C., Barrera, M. T., Dockstader, C. J. & Derr, J. A. (2002). Comparing technology skill development in computer lab versus classroom settings of two sixth form grade classes. Journal of Online Interactive Learning, 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1990). The computer lab: A bad idea now sanctified. Educational Technology, 30, 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sølvberg, A. M., & Rismark, M. (2012). Learning spaces in mobile learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13, 23–33.10.1177/1469787411429189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, R. (1977). Classroom layout. Theory into Practice, 16, 174–175.10.1080/00405847709542694
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51, 212–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turbill, J. (2001). A researcher goes to school: Using technology in the kindergarten literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1, 255–279.10.1177/14687984010013002
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Driessche, M. (2009). Architecture of the educational complex in the Belgian context. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University Ghent.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do? Philosophical reflections on technology, agency and design. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (2013). Building a global community of policymakers, researchers and educators to move education systems into the digital age. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 399–402.10.1111/jcal.2013.29.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & Roblin Pareja, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 299–321.10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for Building Schools for the Future. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 47–70.10.1080/03054980601094693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandvliet, D. (2006). Education is not rocket science: The case for deconstructing computer labs in schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zandvliet, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2004). Learning environments in information and communications technology classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 97–123.10.1080/14759390400200175
   Google Scholar