The significance of a process evaluation in interpreting the validity of an RCT evaluation of a complex teaching intervention: the case of Integrated Group Reading (IGR) as a targeted intervention for delayed Year 2 and 3 pupils

References

• Cartwright, N. C. (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties, 2, 11–20.10.1017/S1745855207005029
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, P. J., Snowling, M. J., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1106–1116.10.1177/0956797610375449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. A., Stichter, J. P., Daunic, A., & Haydon, T. (2008). Classroom-based research in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders: Methodological issues and future research directions. The Journal of Special Education, 41(4), 209–222.10.1177/0022466907310369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE. (2013). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 1 & 2 framework document. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, F. J., Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., & Hulme, C. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of a phonologically based reading intervention for struggling readers with varying language profiles. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 621–640.10.1007/s11145-010-9291-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828.10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2015). An evaluation of the ‘Switch-on Reading’ literacy catch-up programme. British Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 596–612.10.1002/berj.3157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harachi, T. W., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Fleming, C. B. (1999). Opening the black box: Using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(5), 711–731.10.1023/A:1022194005511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., … Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical research council guidance. British Medical Journal, 350, h1258.10.1136/bmj.h1258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NLS. (1998). National Literacy Strategies: Framework for teaching. London: DfEE.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A., Strange, V., Toroyan, T., Wiggins, M., Roberts, I., & Stephenson, J. (2003). Using random allocation to evaluate social interventions: Three recent UK examples. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589(1), 170–189.10.1177/0002716203254765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, A., Strange, V., Bonell, C., Allen, E., Stephenson, J., & RIPPLE Study Team. (2006). Health services research: Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. British Medical Journal, 332(7538), 413–416.10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R., Jabin, N., Bussard, L., Cartagena, J., Haywood, S., & Lumpkin, M. (2017). Switch-on effectiveness trial: Evaluation report and executive summary, May 2017. London: EEF.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realist evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (2010). Research base for guided reading as an instructional approach. Retrieved from http://emea.scholastic.com/sites/default/files/GR_Research_Paper_2010_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Interim report. London: DFES.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, N., Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2016). Accelerated Reader as a literacy catch-up intervention during primary to secondary school transition phase. Educational Review, 68(2), 139–154.10.1080/00131911.2015.1067883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece, D. L., Schatschneider, C., Silverman, R., Case, L. P., Cooper, D. H., & Jacobs, D. M. (2011). Identification of reading problems in first grade within a response to instruction framework. Elementary School Journal, 111, 585–607.10.1086/659032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stame, N. (2004). Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation, 10(1), 58–76.10.1177/1356389004043135
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing, J. (2018). Integrated Group Reading programme. Retrived from http://www.integratedgroupreading.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D.L. (2002). The 2 E’s of research: Efficacy and effectiveness trail. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47(5), 553–556.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, N. (2017). Theories of change and their application in policy and practice. Research intelligence: Methodological challenges, 133, 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling. Nottingham: DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Solís, M., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., & Fletcher, J. M. (2016). Effects from a randomized control trial comparing researcher and school-implemented treatments with fourth graders with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(sup1), 23–44.10.1080/19345747.2015.1126386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar