Datafying the teaching ‘profession’: remaking the professional teacher in the image of data

References

• Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Rethinking value-added models in education: Critical perspectives on test and assessment-based accountability. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Holloway, J. (2017). Value-added models for teacher evaluation and accountability: Commonsense assumptions. Educational Policy. doi:10.1177/0895904817719519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2016). PISA, policy and persuasion: Translating complex conditions into education ‘best practice’. Comparative Education, 52(2), 202–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers. (C. Nash, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). Critical theory/intellectual history. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings of Michel Foucault, 1977-1984 (pp. 17–46). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). On the archaeology of the sciences: Response to the Epistemology Circle. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Aethetics, method and epistemology: Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 297–333). New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J. (2015). Public education in neoliberal times: Memory and desire. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 855–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2013). Expert moves: International comparative testing and the rise of expertocracy. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 695–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2017). Socialisation, learning and the OECD’s reviews of national policies for education: The case of Sweden. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller, M. Sosna, & D. E. Wellbery (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality and the self in Western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2013). Testing that counts: Contesting national literacy assessment policy in complex schooling settings. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36(2), 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2015). A logic of enumeration: The nature and effects of national literacy and numeracy testing in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 335–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., & Lewis, S. (2017). The ‘doublethink’ of data: Educational performativity and the field of schooling practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(5), 671–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2018). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., Sørensen, T. B., & Verger, A. (2017). Global perspectives on high-stakes teacher accountability policies: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(92), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Hogan, A. (2016). Reform first and ask questions later? The implications of (fast) schooling policy and ‘silver bullet’ solutions. Critical Studies in Education. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1219961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2016). Think tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 15–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Lewis, S. (2016). Globalisation of the Anglo-American approach to top-down, test-based educational accountability. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 387–403). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Lewis, S. (2017). Accountabilities in schools and school systems. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, M. (2013). ‘Datafication’: Making sense of (big) data in a complex world. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 381–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nóvoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (1987). Studying education through the lives of policy makers: An attempt to close the micro-macro gap. In S. Walker & L. Barton (Eds.), Changing policies, changing teachers: New directions for schooling? (pp. 138–150). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2016). Trust in numbers? Digital education governance and the inspection process. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (2012). Funny numbers. Culture Unbound, 4, 585–598.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1994). The audit explosion: Rituals of verification. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488856
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J., & Rawolle, S. (2013). Neoliberalism is not a theory of everything: A Bourdeiuian analysis of illusio in educational research. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sætnan, A. R., Lomell, H. M., & Hammer, S. (2011). Introduction: By the very act of counting: The mutual construction of statistics and society. In A. R. Saetnan, H. M. Lomell, & S. Hammer (Eds.), The mutual construction of statistics and society (pp. 1–17). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, M. (2015). Governing education without reform: The power of the example. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 712–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. C. (Ed.). (2016). The global testing culture: Shaping education policy, perceptions and practice. Wallingford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2014). Manipulating the data: Teaching and NAPLAN in the control society. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T., & Gulson, K. (2012). Policy prolepsis in education: Encounters, becomings, and phantasms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(1), 87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar