The politics of student voice: unravelling the multiple discourses articulated in schools

References

• Anderson, A. (2015). The critical purchase of genealogy: Critiquing student participation projects. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(1), 42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, G., Kaur, B., Ohtani, M., & Clarke, D. (2013). The learner’s perspectives study: Attending to student voice. In B. Kaur, G. Anthony, M. Ohtani, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Student voice in mathematics classrooms around the world (pp. 1–12). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2016). Pedagogic voice: Student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2009). Te Kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 734–742.10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, B., Dixon, H., & Hill, M. (2016). Assessment capability for New Zealand teachers and students: Challenging but possible. SET, 2, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, R. (2016). Liberating the learner through self-assessment. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, R., & Loveridge, J. (2014a). ‘Radical collegiality’ through student voice: Challenging our understandings of educational experience, policy and practice. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 49(2), 126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, R., & Loveridge, J. (2014b). Exposing the divide between assessment and the point of learning through student voice. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 49(2), 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, S. (2007). Student voice and governmentality: The production of enterprising subjects? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 343–358.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, S., & Manchester, H. (2012). Pedagogies of student voice. Revista de Education, 359, 143–163.
   Google Scholar
• Brasof, M. (2015). Student voice and school governance: Distributing leadership to youth and adults. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.10.2307/3207893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter – On the discursive limits of sex. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J. (2013). Learner agency: A dynamic element of the New Zealand key competencies. Teachers and Curriculum Journal, 13, 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J. (2014a). Learner agency, dispositionality and the New Zealand curriculum key competencies. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 11(2), 175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J. (2014b). Agentic subjectivities and key competencies. Curriculum Matters, 10, 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J. (2015). Dialogic feedback as divergent assessment for learning: An ecological approach to teacher professional development. Critical Studies in Education, 57(3), 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2015). Teacher agency and dialogic feedback: Using classroom data for practitioner inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 114–123.10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook- Sather, A. (2014). The trajectory of student voice in educational research. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 49(2), 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2007). Resisting the impositional potential of student voice work: Lessons for liberatory educational research from poststructuralist feminist critiques of critical pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2010). Students as learners and teachers: Taking responsibility, transforming education, and redefining accountability. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(4), 555–575.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2010.00501.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham and London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822392996
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler’s analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. J. (2015). Aboriginal student stories, the missing voice to guide us towards change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 42(5), 613–625.10.1007/s13384-015-0182-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (1999). Radical collegiality: Affirming teaching as an inclusive professional practice. Australian Educational Researcher, 26(2), 1–34.10.1007/BF03219692
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123–141.10.1023/A:1017949213447
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.10.1080/0141192042000195236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. (2015). Student voice: An emerging discourse in Irish Education Policy. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 223–242.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power [Afterword]. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gorden, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. (M. Senellart (Ed.), G. Burchell (Trans.), Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979). New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, L., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. Childhood, 15, 499–516.10.1177/0907568208091672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2011a). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2011b). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2015). Dangerous thinking in the age of the new authoritarianism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S. (2009). Consulting young people: An untapped resource for school improvement. Presentation to: Sydney South West Region, NSW DET PAS Principals’ Partnership Program. Retrieved from www.swgate.org.uk/dodownload.asp?did=26394
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S. (2011). Concerning equity: The voice of young people. Leading and Managing, 17(2), 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2016). From data source to co-researchers? Tracing the shift from ‘student voice’ to student–teacher partnerships in Educational Action Research. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Clode, A. (2012). Ko te reo o nga akonga: Creative leadership of Maori student partnerships. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 27(1), 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., Thompson, G., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2017). Teachers’ and school leaders’ perceptions of commercialisation in Australian public schools. The Australian Educational Researcher. Online at: https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.une.edu.au/article/10.1007/s13384-017-0246-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynds, A., Faircloth, S. C., Green, C., & Jacob, H. (2014). Researching identity with indigenous D/deaf youth. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 49(2), 176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Hynds, A. S., Hindle, R., Savage, C., Meyer, L. H., Penetito, W., & Sleeter, C. (2016). The impact of teacher professional development to reposition pedagogy for indigenous students in mainstream schools. The Teacher Educator, 51(3), 230–249.10.1080/08878730.2016.1176829
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2015). Student voice and teacher accountability: Possibilities and problematics. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(2), 225–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2017). School autonomy reform and public education in Australia: Implications for social justice. Australian Education Researcher, 44(4–5), 373–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 263–268.10.1080/09695940903319646
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). PISA for schools: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD’s global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 27–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Lewis, S. (2017). Accountabilities in schools and school Systems. Oxford University Press. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Linnell, S. (2008). Found wanting and becoming undone: A response to Eva Bendix Petersen. In J. Davies (Ed.), Judith Butler in conversation. Analyzing the texts and talk of everyday life (pp. 69–87). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1996). An essay concerning human understanding. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, C. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Maidenhead: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In B. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 164–183). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2016). The refrain of the a-grammatical child: Finding another language in/for qualitative research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2016). Shifting research methods with a becoming-child ontology: Co-theorising puppet production with high school students. Childhood, 23(1), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2017). Reconceptualizing the presence of students on school governance councils: The a/effects of spatial positioning. Policy Futures in Education. doi:10.1177/1478210317739468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, E., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2013). Performing alternative positions: Student voice, reflection and reform. In V. Grion & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), Student voice. Prospetive internazionali e pratiche emergenti in Italia (pp. 193–211). Milan: Guerini.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. (2016). Voice without a subject. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miliband, D. (2006). Choice and voice in personalised learning. In OECD (Ed.), Schooling for tomorrow: Personalising Education (pp. 21–30). Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/site/schoolingfortomorrowknowledgebase/.../41175554.pdf10.1787/19900716
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. (2016). The ideology of learner agency and the neoliberal self. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 348–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2011). Ministry of Education position paper: Assessment [Schooling Sector]. Retrieved from http://assessment.tki.org.nz/content/download/5539/49218/file/MOEAssessmentPositionPaperOctober11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2016). Professional learning and development is changing. Retrieved from http://services.education.govt.nz/pld
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2017). Ed Act Update - The Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/legislation/the-education-update-amendment-act/#overview
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D., & Serriere, S. (2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: Examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 743–774.10.3102/0002831212443079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2016). Testing students under cognitive capitalism: knowledge production of twenty-first century skills. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 805–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. (2014). Is this student voice?’ Students and teachers re-negotiate power through governance partnerships in the classroom. PhD thesis, University of Waikato. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10289/8846
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. (2015a). Student voice as regimes of truth: Troubling authenticity. Middle Grades Review, 1(2). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/mgreview/vol1/iss2/3
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. (2015b). Opening up to student voice: Supporting teacher learning through collaborative action research. Learning Landscapes, 8(2), 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. (2017). ‘It’s cool, people your same age being in charge of you’: Enacting student voice through classroom governance partnerships. In R. McNae & B. Cowie (Eds.), Realising innovative partnerships in educational research (pp. 9–19). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., & Christenson, K. (2009). Photovoice in the middle: How our students experience learning at school and beyond. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 6(1), 35–46. Retrieved from www.teacherswork.ac.nz/journal/volume6issue1/nelson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2013). Innovative learning environments. Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264203488-en.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook of global education policy (pp. 128–144). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781118468005
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, L., & Richardson, T. (2001). Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3(3), 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Smardon, D., Charteris, J., & Nelson, E. (2015). Shifts to learning eco-systems: Principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of innovative learning environments. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work., 12(2), 149–171. Retrieved from https://teachworkojs.aut.ac.nz/autojs/index.php/nzjtw/article/download/31/56
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. (2012). Doing research on student voice in Australia. Management in Education, 26(3), 153–154.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2013). Making ‘space’: Young people put at a disadvantage re-engaging with learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Hughes. (2016). Introduction. In C. Taylor & Hughes, (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 1–4). New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Robinson, C. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(2), 161–175.10.1080/14681360902934392
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. (2000). Reconcilable differences? Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuinamuana, K. (2011). Teacher professional standards, accountability, and ideology: Alternative discourses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., & Wisby, E. (2007). Whose voice? An exploration of current policy interest in pupil involvement in school decision-making. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(3), 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, T., Lingard, B., & Thomson, P. (2012). Pedagogies of transformation: Keeping hope alive in troubled times. Critical Studies in Education, 53(1), 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar