The ability trap: reductionist theorising about academic ability and the ramifications for education policy and school-based practice

References

• Alexander, J. C. (1995). Fin de siècle social theory. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2010). New class inequalities in education: Why education policy may be looking in the wrong place! Education policy, civil society and social class. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(3/4), 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davison (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (Vol. 18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1997). The Forms of Capital. In A. H. Halsey, K. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2013). Education, opportunity and the prospects for social mobility. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5–6), 678–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring (CEM). (2020). Retrieved from https://www.cem.org/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, R. (2006). Class and family. The Sociological Review, 54(4), 658–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y. (2013). Excellence at the cost of social justice? Negotiating and balancing priorities in gifted education. Roeper Review, 35(2), 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2017). Unlocking talent, fulfilling potential: A plan for improving social mobility through education. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/667690/Social_Mobility_Action_Plan_-_for_printing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1902). The Child and the Curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2010a). Injustice: Why social inequality persists. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2010b). The return to elitism in education. Soundings, 44(44), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, M., & Gazeley, L. (2008). Teachers, social class and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(5), 451–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1996). British ability scales II. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Formenti, L., & West, L. (Eds.). (2014). Stories that make a difference. Exploring the collective, social and political potential of narratives in adult education research. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2004). International comparisons of student attainment: Some issues arising from the PISA study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). ‘Cultural Capital’: Some critical observations. Sociologica, 1(2).
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., Vance, A., & Watson, S. D. (2016). Structure of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children–fourth edition in a group of children with ADHD. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, A., & Gregg, P. (Eds.). (2010). Poorer children’s educational attainment: How important are attitudes and behaviour? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. (2010). Education can compensate for society – a bit. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(1), 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. R. (1992). The capital(s) of cultures: A nonholistic approach to status situations, class, gender, and ethnicity. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 257–286). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. (2016). The relationship between teacher perceptions of pupil attractiveness and academic ability. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 376–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hymer, B. J. (2009). Beyond compare? Thoughts towards an inclusional, fluid and non-normative understanding of giftedness. In T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 299–307). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. (2015). How Bourdieu bites back: Recognising misrecognition in education and educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J., & Vignoles, A. (2011). The use (and misuse) of statistics in understanding social mobility: Regression to the mean and the cognitive development of high ability children from disadvantaged homes (No. 11-01). Department of Quantitative Social Science-UCL Institute of Education, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 281–388). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Toronto: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6, 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (2001). Creating a dialogue between sociological and egalitarian theory in education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11(3), 237–260.
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). History of theories and measurement in intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 3–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malanchini, M., Engelhardt, L. E., Grotzinger, A. D., Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2019). ‘Same but different’: Associations between multiple aspects of self-regulation, cognition, and academic abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(6), 1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. J., & Dai, D. Y. (2014). Gifted education: Changing conceptions, emphases and practice. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 335–353.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005). Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education. Roeper Review, 28(2), 64–69.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2008). Wrestling with misconceptions: Is the gifted label good or bad? Understanding Our Gifted, 20(4), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoli Smith, L. (2014). Extending sociological theorising on high ability: The significance of values and lived experience. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 354–371.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoli Smith, L., & Todd, L. (2019). Conceptualising poverty as a barrier to learning through ‘Poverty Proofing the School Day’ the genesis and impacts of stigmatisation. British Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 356–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, T., Dorling, D., & Davey Smith, G. (2016). How well can we predict educational outcomes? Examining the roles of cognitive ability and social position in educational attainment. Contemporary Social Science, 11(2–3), 154–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (1999). Realism in the sociology of education: ‘Explaining’ social differences in attainment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(1), 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (2001). Class, ‘ability’ and attainment: A problem for the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(2), 189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (2002). Numbers and narratives: Further reflections in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (2005). The cognitive habitus: Its place in a realist account of inequality/difference. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(5), 599–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2015). The most able students (Report 150034). London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Power, S., Whitty, G., Edwards, T., & Wigfall, V. (1998). Schools, families and academically able students: Contrasting modes of involvement in secondary education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(2), 157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (1998). Cultural reproduction: Mothers’ involvement in their children’s primary schooling.  In M. Grenfell & D. James (Eds.), Bourdieu and Education: Acts of Practical Theory (pp. 55–71). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. (2009). Opportunity structures then and now. Journal of Education and Work, 22(5), 355–368.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2006). Three models of education: Rights, capabilities and human capital. School Field, 4(1), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1999). Bourdieu, Smith and disinterested judgement. The Sociological Review, 47(3), 403–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. L. (2011). SQB topic overview 6: Measuring educational attainment. Colchester: UK Data Service.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. B., & Smart, C. (1999). The ‘new’ practices and politics of family life. In E. Silva & C. Smart (Eds.), The new family? (pp. 1–12).  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (2003). Failing boys and moral panics: Perspectives on the underachievement debate. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(3), 282–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, L., Fleming, T., & Finnegan, F. (2013). Connecting Bourdieu, Winnicott, and Honneth: Understanding the experiences of non-traditional learners through an interdisciplinary lens. Studies in the Education of Adults, 45(2), 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2020). Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/WhatWeDo
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2006). Intelligence, destiny and education: The ideological roots of intelligence testing. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (1983). Cultural production and theories of reproduction. In L. Barton & S. Walker (Eds.), Race, class and education (pp. 107–138). London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, T., Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: Students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, T. T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20, Article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.
   Google Scholar