700
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How teacher competence functions as an institutionalised discourse in the epoch of globalisation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 105-125 | Received 21 Aug 2019, Accepted 10 Jun 2020, Published online: 30 Jun 2020

References

  • Anderson, G. L. (1962). Professional education: Present status and continuing problems. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Education for the professions (pp. 3–26). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Apple, M. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservatism in a global context. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 57–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Apple, M. W. (1993). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Teachers College Record, 95(2), 222–241.
  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from https://aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/apst-resources/australian_professional_standard_for_teachers_final.pdf
  • Ball, S. (1993). Education policy, power relations and teachers’ work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 106–121.
  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
  • Ball, S. (2006). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. Dillabough, & A. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization & social change (pp. 692–701). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ball, S. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Ball, S. (2016). Subjectivity as a site of struggle: Refusing neoliberalism?. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(8), 1129–1146.
  • Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey.
  • Beck, J. (2009). Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring the official knowledge base of England’s ‘modernised’ teaching profession. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 3–14.
  • Berardi, F. (2012). The uprising: On poetry and finance. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
  • Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302.
  • Blackmore, J. (2006). Localization/globalization and the midwife state: Strategic dilemmas for state feminism in education. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. Dillabough, & A. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization & social change (pp. 212–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Boas, T., & Gans-Morse, J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(2), 137–161.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflective sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Breakspear, S. (2014). How does PISA shape policy making? Why how we measure learning determines what counts in education. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.
  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.
  • Brown, W. (2019). In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the West. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence of accountability reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Caena, F. (2011). Literature review: Quality in teachers’ continuing professional development. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture.  Retrieved from https://goo.gl/2eNfaS
  • Chitty, C. (2004). Education policy in Britain. London: Palgrave.
  • Clarke, J. (2008). Living with/in and without neoliberalism. Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology, 51, 135–147.
  • Codd, J., Gordon, L., & Harker, R. (1997). Education and the role of the state: Devolution and control Post-Picot. In A. H. Halsey, H. Hauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education, culture, economy and society (pp. 263–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Conway, P. F., Murphy, R., Rath, A., & Hall, K. (2010). Learning to teach and its implications for the continuum of teacher education: A nine-country cross-national study. Report Commissioned by the Teaching Council. University College Cork and Teaching Council of Ireland.
  • Cussó, R., & D’Amico, S. (2005). From development comparativism to globalization comparativism: Towards more normative international education statistics. Comparative Education, 41(2), 199–216.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (2000). Studies of excellence in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
  • Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677–692.
  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
  • Department of Education. (2011). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/publications
  • Embse, N. P., Pendergast, L. L., Segool, N., Saeki, E., & Ryan, S. (2016). The influence of test-based accountability policies on school climate and teacher stress across four states. Teaching and Teachers Education, 59, 492–502.
  • European Commission DG Education and Culture. (2005). Common European principles for teacher competences and qualifications. Retrieved from http://www.pef.uni-lj.si/bologna/dokumenti/eu-common-principles.pdf
  • European Commission on Education and Training. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Report of the Thematic Working Group on Teacher Professional Development.
  • European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2018). Teaching careers in Europe: Access, progression and support. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Ferguson, J. (2010). The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode, 41, 166–184.
  • Forghani-Arani, N., Cerna, L., & Bannon, M. (2019). The lives of teachers in diverse classrooms (OECD Education Working Papers No. 198). Paris: OECD Publications. doi: 10.1787/8c26fee5-en
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1975). The birth of the clinic: An archeology of medical perception. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. London: Penguin.
  • Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
  • Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended. New York, NY: Picador.
  • Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York, NY: Picador.
  • Foucault, M. (2011). The courage of truth: Lectures at the Collège de France II. 1983–1984. Trans. G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals. New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Gogolin, I. (2011). The challenge of super diversity for education in Europe. Education Inquiry, 2(2), 239–249.
  • Goode, W. (1966). Professions and non-professions. In H. M. Vollmer & D. L. Mills (Eds.), Professionalization (pp. 33–45). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Goodson, I., & Dowbiggin, I. (1990). Docile bodies: Commonalities in the history of psychiatry and schooling. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education (pp. 105–129). London: Routledge.
  • Greenwood, E. (1957). Attributes of a profession. Social Work, 2, 45–55.
  • Guo, S. (2010). Migration and communities: Challenges and opportunities for lifelong learning. International Jounral of Lifelong Education, 29(4), 437–447.
  • Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and egalitarian beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers’ professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teachers, 45, 44–55.
  • Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hanover Research. (2011). A survey of race to the top teacher evaluation systems. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Hanushek, E. (2010). The difference is teacher quality. In K. Weber (Ed.), Waiting for ‘Superman’: How we can save America’s failing public schools? (pp. 81–100). New York, NY: Public Affairs.
  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  • Hattam, R., & Smyth, J. (1995). Ascertaining the nature of competent teaching: A discursive practice. Critical Pedagogy Networker, 8(3&4), 1–12.
  • Hattie, J., & Clinton, J. (2008). Identifying accomplished teachers: A validation study. In L. Ingvarson & J. A. C. Hattie (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification. The first decade of the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards (pp. 313–344). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Hayek, F. A. (2007). The road to serfdom. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. London: Thomson Learning.
  • Keohane, R. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29–43.
  • Kleinhenz, E., & Ingvarson, L. (2007). Standards for teaching. Theoretical underpinnings and applications. New Zealand Teachers Council. Retrieved from https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.tw/&httpsredir=1&article=1000&context=teaching_standards
  • Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism. London: University of California Press.
  • Leggatt, T. (1970). Teaching as a profession. In J. A. Jackson (Ed.), Professions and professionalization (pp. 155–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lerch, J., Bromley, P., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2017). The rise of individual agency in conceptions of society: Textbooks worldwide, 1950–2011. International Sociology, 32(1), 38–60.
  • Lingard, B. (2000). It is and it isn’t: Vernacular globalization, educational policy, and restructuring. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 79–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Locke, T., Vulliamy, G., Webb, R., & Hill, M. (2005). Being a ‘professional’ primary school teacher at the beginning of the 21st century: A comparative analysis of primary teacher professionalism in New Zealand and England. Journal of Education Policy, 20(5), 555–581.
  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). School-teacher: A sociological study. London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Louden, W., & Wallace, J. (1993). Competency standards in teaching. Unicorn, 19(1), 45–53.
  • Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2018). Discomforts, opposition and resistance in schools: The perspectives of union representatives. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(7), 1060–1073.
  • McPhail, G. (2017). Does knowledge matter? Disciplinary identities and students’ readiness for university. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 52, 57–71.
  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77.
  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirex, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.
  • Miller, A. D., Ramirez, E. M., & Murdock, T. (2017). The influence of teachers’ self-efficacy on perceptions: Perceived teacher competence and respect and student effort and achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 260–269.
  • Millman, J., & Sykes, G. (1992). The assessment of teaching based on assessment of student learning: An analysis. Washington, DC: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.
  • Ministry of Education New Zealand. (2010). OECD review on evaluation and assessment frameworks for improving school outcomes. New Zealand country background report. Retrieved from www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications
  • Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.
  • Nusche, D., Laveault, D., MacBeath, J., & Santiago, P. (2012). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: New Zealand 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264116917-en
  • OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments. First results from TALIS. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606.pdf
  • OECD. (2014). Talis 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264196261-en
  • Olssen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A. (2004). Education policy: Globalization, citizenship and democracy. London: Sage.
  • Papadopoulos, G. S. (1994). Education 1960–1990 – the OECD perspective. Paris: OECD.
  • Park, M., Zong, J., & Batalova, J. (2018). Growing superdiversity among young U.S. dual language learners and its implications. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
  • Parsons, T. (1954). Essays in sociological theory. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Popkewitz, T. S. (1994). Professionalization in teaching and teacher education: Some notes on its history, ideology, and potential. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 1–14.
  • Pyke, C. L., & Lynch, S. (2005). Mathematics and science teachers’ preparation for national board of teaching standards certification. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 25–35.
  • Revais, N. (2018). What difference do standards make to educating teachers? A review with case studies on Estonia, Singapore and Australia (OECD Education Working Paper No. 174). Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/19939019
  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2006). Globalization and the changing nature in the OECD’s educational work. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, A. Dillabough, & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization and social change (pp. 247–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.
  • Robertson, S. (1996). Teachers’ work, restructuring and postfordism: Constructing the new ‘professionalism’. In I. F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers' professional lives (pp. 1–27). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Robertson, S. (2012). Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584–607.
  • Robertson, S. (2016). The global governance of teachers’ work. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 275–290). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Robertson, S. (2017). A class act: Changing teachers work, the state, and globalization. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Robertson, S., & Dale, R. (2016). Comparing policies in a globalising world: Methodological reflections. In A. Hadjar & C. Gross (Eds.), Education systems and inequalities  (pp. 33–50). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.
  • Ryan, S. V., Embse, N. P., Pendergast, L. L., Saeki, E., Segool, N., & Schwing, S. (2017). Leaving the teaching profession: The role of teacher stress and educational accountability policies on turnover intent. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 1–11.
  • Säfström, C. A. (2005). The European knowledge society and the diminishing state control of education: The case of Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 20(5), 583–593.
  • Santiago, P., Benavides, F., Danielson, C., Goe, L., & Nusche, D. (2013). Teacher evaluation in Chile ( OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education). Paris: OECD.
  • Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.
  • Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19.
  • Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (2016). The handbook of neoliberalism. London: Routledge.
  • Tang, S. Y. F., Wong, A. K. Y., & Cheng, M. M. H. (2016). Examining professionallearning and the preparation of professionally competent teachers in initial teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 54–69.
  • Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2014). Education policy-making and time. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 700–715.
  • Thomson, J. (2014). Teacher performance plays growing role in employment decisions (ED560990). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
  • Torres, C. A. (2006). Globalization and higher education in the Americas. In R. Rhoads & C. A. Torres (Eds.), The university, state, and market (pp. 3–38). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Trippestad, T. A. (2016). The glocal teacher: The paradox agency of teaching in a glocalised world. Policy Futures in Education, 14(4), 9–23.
  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.
  • Vertovec, S. (2019). Talking around super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(1), 125–139.
  • Whitty, G. (1994). Deprofessionalising teaching: Recent developments in teacher education in England (Occasional Paper No.22). Canberra: Australian College of Education.
  • Zhu, C., Wang, D., Cai, Y., & Nadine, E. (2013). What core competences are related to teachers’ innovative teaching? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 9–27.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.