Korean adolescents’ profiles of digital citizenship and its relations to internet ethics: implications for critical digital citizenship education

References

• Ainse. (2020). Digital citizenship education. Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.digitalcitizen.kr/front/digital/digitalcitizenList.do
   Google Scholar
• Al Abdullatif, A., & Gameil, A. (2020). Exploring students’ knowledge and practice of digital citizenship in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(19), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.15611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Menayes, J. J. (2015). Dimensions of social media addiction among university students in Kuwait. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150401.14
   Google Scholar
• Atif, Y., & Chou, C. (2018). Digital citizenship: Innovations in education, practice, and pedagogy. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 152–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, S. M. (2017). The influence of strain factors, social control factors, self-control and computer use on adolescent cyber delinquency: Korean national panel study. Children and Youth Services Review, 78, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, Group Identity, and Citizenship Education in a Global Age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08317501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Fessenden, J. (2006). Citizenship through online communication. Social Education, 70(3), 144–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., & Trost, K. (2006). The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 601–632. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J. J., & Stinson, D. A. (2019). Gender (mis) measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(11), e12506. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. S. (2017, November 8). If the youth had also voted, Park Geun-hye would not have been elected in the first place. Sisain. https://www.sisain.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=30465
   Google Scholar
• Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M., & Cristol, D. (2021). Digital citizenship with intersectionality lens: Towards participatory democracy driven digital citizenship education. Theory into Practice, 60(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2021.1987094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M., Cristol, D., & Gimbert, B. (2018). Teachers as digital citizens: The influence of individual backgrounds, internet use, and psychological characteristics on teachers’ levels of digital citizenship. Computers & Education, 121, 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers& Education, 107, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M., & Park, HJ. (2015). A validation study on the Korean digital citizenship scale through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education in Korea, 47(4), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.47.4.201512.009
   Google Scholar
• Choi, M., & Park, HJ. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ levels of digital citizenship: Implications for digital citizenship education. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education in Korea, 51(1), 275–310.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. Y., & Garcia, S. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching efficacy beliefs of in-service special education teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513520511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. (2006). Digital voices and analogue citizenship bridging the gap between young people and the democratic process. Public Policy Research, 13(4), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1070-3535.2006.00451.x
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., & Westerhof, K. J. (2001). The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour. Learning Environments Research, 4(1), 51–85. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011402608575
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M., Lawson, S., & Sun, Y. (2012). Occupy wall street on the public screens of social media: The many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2012.01141.x
   Google Scholar
• De Marco, S., Robles, J. M., & Antino, M. (2014). Digital skills as a conditioning factor for digital political participation. The European Journal of Communication Research, 39(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emejulu, A., & McGregor, C. (2019). Towards a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1234494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, B., & von Gillern, S. (2018). Digital citizenship with social media: Participatory practices of teaching and learning in secondary education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 200–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, M., & Marcovitz, D. (2019). Reconceptualizing digital citizenship curricula: Designing a critical and justice-oriented digital citizenship course. Society for information technology & teacher education international conference, Las Vegas, United States (pp. 665–672). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., Oser, J., & Marien, S. (2016). A comparative analysis of ‘good citizenship’: A latent class analysis of adolescents’ citizenship norms in 38 countries. International Political Science Review, 37(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114541562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2021). ISTE standards for teachers. http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., & Ito, M. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jobst, N. (2021, August 11). Internet usage in South Korea-statistics & facts. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/2230/internet-usage-in-south-korea/#dossierKeyfigures
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39, 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M. J., & Glassman, M. (2010). Moral action as social capital, moral thought as cultural capital. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240903528592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, D., & Xu, S. (2017). A research on factors affecting college students’ digital citizenship. International conference of educational innovation through technology, Osaka, Japan (pp. 61–64).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H. (2020). Digital citizenship education in the age of online education. Korean Educational Development Institute. Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.kedi.re.kr/eng/kedi/main/main.do
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Glassman, M. (2013). Beyond search and communication: Development and validation of the internet self-efficacy scale (ISS). Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1421–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, J., & Lim, J. (2012). The longitudinal influence of parent–child relationships and depression on cyber delinquency in South Korean adolescents: A latent growth curve model. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(5), 908–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of internet political participation in the United States a resource approach. American Politics Research, 30(5), 476–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauricella, A. R., Herdzina, J., & Robb, M. (2020). Early childhood educators’ teaching of digital citizenship competencies. Computers & Education, 158, 103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2017). What drives political participation? Motivations and mobilization in a digital age. Political Communication, 34(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1225235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance| surveillance culture: Engagement, exposure, and ethics in digital modernity. International Journal of Communication, 11, 824–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirra, N., McGrew, S., Kahne, J., Garcia, A., & Tynes, B. (2022). Expanding digital citizenship education to address tough issues. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(5), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221079976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, J., Morizot, J., Boudrias, S., & Madore, I. (2011). A multifoci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14(1), 58–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109356476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Youth Policy Institute. (2011). Korean youth panel study (panel data for 8th grade). https://www.nypi.re.kr/archive/mps/program/examinDataCode/dataDwloadAgreeView?menuId=MENU00226
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oser, J., Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912436695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandya, Z., Hansuvadha, N., & Pagdilao, K. A. C. (2018). Digital literacies through an intersectional lens: The case of javier. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 17(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-11-2017-0158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, N., & Glassman, M. (2017). Relationship between internet self-efficacy and internet anxiety: A nuanced approach to understanding the connection. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, F. (2016). Students’ perceptions of good citizenship: A person-centered approach. Social Psychology of Education, 19(3), 661–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9342-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, F. (2017). Young adults’ conceptions of ‘good’ citizenship behaviours: A latent class analysis. Journal of Civil Society, 13(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1270959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know. International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, M. G., Gee, D., & Mohammed, S. (2019). A literature review: Digital citizenship and the elementary educator. International Journal of Technology in Education, 2(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, H. S., & Lee, Y. (2017). A latent profile analysis and structural equation modeling of the instructional quality of mathematics classrooms based on the PISA 2012 results of Korea and Singapore. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Kim, S., & Jung, Y. (2019). Needs analysis of digital citizenship education for university students in South Korea: Using importance-performance analysis. Educational Technology International, 20(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public affairs.
   Google Scholar