Toward a Praxis-Oriented Understanding of Student Self-Assessment in STEAM Education: How Exemplary Educators Leverage Self-Assessment

References

• Allal, L. (2020). Assessment and the co-regulation of learning in the classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2019.1609411
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Eds.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment, (pp. 17–34). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, R. (2016). Liberating the learner through self-assessment. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1015963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boy, G. A. (2013, August 26). From STEM to STEAM: Toward a human-centred education [ Paper presentation]. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?print=yes&R=20130011666
   Google Scholar
• Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 368–389). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., LaPorte, J., & Seawright, J. (2012). Putting typologies to work: Concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912437162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Cooke, C., Davies, R., & Trowsdale, J. (Eds.). (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: How can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education?. British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. A., Gane, B. D., Neumann, K., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2020). Contemporary methods of assessing integrated STEM competencies. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 234–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, S. M., Kolohon, W., & Reid, J. L. (2014). Interweaving curriculum and classroom assessment: Engaging the 21st century learner. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubek, M., DeLuca, C., & Rickey, N. (2021). Unlocking the potential of STEAM education: How exemplary teachers navigate assessment challenges. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(6), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1990002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L. D., Adams, R., & King, D. (2020). Design learning in STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 76–86). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fastré, G. M. J., van der Klink, M. R., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012). Drawing students’ attention to relevant assessment criteria: Effects on self-assessment skills and performance. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2011.630537
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. (2015, June 16). STEAM rising: Why we need to put the arts into STEM education. June 16. https://slate.com/technology/2015/06/steam-vs-stem-why-we-need-to-put-the-arts-into-stem-education.html
   Google Scholar
• Glisic, M., & Favaro, P. (2018). Empowering modern learners: 21st century learning - phase 1 evaluation report. Peel District School Board. http://www.arniedocs.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Cat_3_GlisicFavaro-Paul-Favaro.pd
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Herbert, M., Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing. The Elementary School Journal 115(4), 523–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresnigt, R., Taconis, R., van Keulen, H., Gravemeijer, K., & Baartman, L. (2014). Promoting science and technology in primary education: A review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzey, S. S., Caskurlu, S., & Kozan, K. (2020). Integrated STEM pedagogies and student learning. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 65–75). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive educational change: Emotional responses of teachers and implications for leadership. School Leadership & Management, 24(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243042000266936
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: The influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 1(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9000-7
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020). The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 33(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin-Siegler, X., Shaenfield, D., & Elder, A. D. (2015). Contrasting case instruction can improve self-assessment of writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9390-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, R., & Kossack, S. (2007). Effects of recurring use of self-assessment in university courses. The International Journal of Learning: Annual ReviewThe International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 12(4), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v14i04/45277
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2004). Trusting the teacher: Evaluating educational innovation. Evaluation, 10(4), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389004050219
   Google Scholar
• NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. (2021). Instructor guide: Engineering in the classroom. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/teach/resources/engineering-in-the-classroom.php
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M., & Pearson, G. (2014, June 15). Integration in K–12 STEM education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. In 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24.781.1- 24.781.17). American Society for Engineering Education. https://strategy.asee.org/20673
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research: A report on STEM integration in K-12 education, by the National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (the USA). The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18612/stem-integration-in-k-12-education-status-prospects-and-an
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018a). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Handbook-PISA-2018-Global-Competence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018b). The future of education and skills. Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%2005.04.2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2013). Literacy and numeracy secretariat’s capacity building series: Inquiry-based learning. https://thelearningexchange.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/CBS_InquiryBased.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). 21^st century competencies: Foundation document for discussion. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/21stCenturyLearning/21CL_21stCenturyCompetencies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Student self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how it is acquired, and how to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 11(30), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance/Rúbricas y guiones de autoevaluación: efectos sobre la autorregulación y el rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios de primer año. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 37(1), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, G. (2017). National academies piece on integrated STEM. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1289781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W. (2017). Teaching, learning and assessing 21st century skills. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession, Educational Research and Innovation (pp. 223–251). OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2020). Applying Theory to STEM Education. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 39–50). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social science. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegesmund, A. (2017). Using self-assessment to develop metacognition and self-regulated learners. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(11), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinay, E., Jaipal-Jamani, K., Nahornick, A., & Douglin, M. (2016). STEM teaching and learning in the Toronto District School Board: Towards a strong theoretical foundation and scaling up from initial implementation of the K-12 STEM strategy. Research Series I. Research Report No. 15/16–16. Toronto District School Board.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). Dancing robots: Integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. (2007). Conceptions of self-assessment: What is needed for long-term learning? In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 114–127). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. C. (2016). Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st century? [Paper presentation]. Research Conference 2016 - Improving STEM Learning: What will it take?. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference/RC2016/9august/6.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuneburg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2019). “Design thinking in STEM”: Education project combining STEM education, design based education and the challenges addressed by the SDGs. Sustainable development goals partner platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=35246
   Google Scholar
• van Reybroeck, M., Penneman, J., Vidick, C., & Galand, B. (2017). Progressive treatment and self-assessment: Effects on students’ automatisation of grammatical spelling and self-efficacy beliefs. Reading and Writing, 30(9), 1965–1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9761-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2017). Using rubrics in student self-assessment: Student perceptions in the English as a foreign language writing context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1280–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar