References
- Akhtar, A., and T. Mahmood. 2020. “Pre-colonial Situation of Women Education in Punjab.” Pakistan Vision 21 (1): 451–465. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/studies/PDF-FILES/33_v21_1_20.pdf
- Bayley, A. 2018. “Posthumanism, Decoloniality and Re-imagining Pedagogy.” Parallax 24 (3): 243–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496576.
- Braidotti, R. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Chatterjee, P. 1989. “Colonialism, Nationalism, and Colonialized Women: The Contest in India.” American Ethnologist 16 (1): 622–633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1989.16.4.02a00020.
- De Lissovoy, N. 2010. “Decolonial Pedagogy and the Ethics of the Global.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 31 (3): 279–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003786886.
- Ferrando, F. 2019. Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury.
- Hashmi, A. 1997. “English Studies in Pakistan.” In Teaching Post-colonialism and Postcolonial Literatures, 84–92. Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
- Macaulay, T. 1835. “Minute upon Indian Education.” http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00generallinks/macaulay/txt_minute_education_1835.html
- Mignolo, W. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
- Mignolo, W. 2018. “The Invention of the Human and the Three Pillars of the Colonial Matrix of Power: Racism, Sexism, and Nature.” In On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis, edited by W. D. Mignolo and C. E. Walsh, 153–176. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
- Rahman, T. 2004. Denizens of Alien Worlds: A Study of Education, Inequality and Polarization in Pakistan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Raja, M. 2010. Constructing Pakistan: Foundational Texts and the Rise of Muslim National Identity, 1857–1947. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sharpe, C. 2010. Monstrous Intimacies: Making Post-slavery Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Siddiqui, J. R. 2016. “Restyling the Humanities Curriculum of Higher Education for Posthuman Times.” Curriculum Inquiry 46 (1): 62–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1133220.
- Sobe, N. W. 2017. “Travelling Researchers, Colonial Difference: Comparative Education in an Age of Exploration.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 47 (3): 332–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1273760.
- Spivak, G. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. London: Macmillan.
- Stengers, I. 2018. “From Science Fiction to Science Studies.” In The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Science, edited by S. Meyer, 25–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Swartz, E. 1996. “Emancipatory Pedagogy: A Postcritical Response to ‘Standard’ School Knowledge.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 28 (4): 397–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280402.
- Viswanathan, G. 1989. Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India. Oxford: Columbia University Press.
- Zembylas, M. 2018. “The Entanglement of Decolonial and Posthuman Perspectives: Tensions and Implications for Curriculum and Pedagogy in Higher Education.” Parallax 24 (3): 254–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496577.