Student engagement: stakeholder perspectives on course representation in university governance

References

• Argyris, C., R. Putnam, and D.M. Smith 1985. Action science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, no. 4: 216–24. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. 2010. So many strategies, so little time … making universities modern. Learning and Teaching, 3, no. 3: 91–116. doi: 10.3167/latiss.2010.030305
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H. 2005. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11, no. 1: 25–36. doi: 10.1080/13538320500074915
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., and K. Brehony 2005. Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31, no. 2: 217–35. doi: 10.1080/03054980500117827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., R. McClelland, and J. Davies 2008. The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16, no. 1: 19–35. doi: 10.1108/09684880810848396
   Google Scholar
• Furedi, F. 2009. Now is the age of the discontented. Times Higher Education, , June 4, 30–35
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. 1992. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.N., and R. Deem 2003. Talking of students: Tensions and contradictions for the manager-academic and the university in contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 46, 289–314. doi: 10.1023/A:1025377826704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Little, B., W. Locke, A. Scesa, and R. Williams 2009. Report to Higher Education Funding Council for England on student engagement. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., and K. Wilson 2009. Student participation in university governance: The role conceptions and sense of efficacy of student representatives on departmental committees. Studies in Higher Education, 34, no. 1: 69–84. doi: 10.1080/03075070802602000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsden, E., H. McBryde-Wilding, and H. Rose 2010. Collaborative practice in enhancing the first year student experience in higher education. Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education, 2, no. 1: 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A. 2009. The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34, no. 2: 171–83. doi: 10.1080/03075070802562857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, B., and J.P. Portelli 2004. Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3, no. 1: 59–76. doi: 10.1076/lpos.3.1.59.27841
   Google Scholar
• Menon, M.E. 2003. Student involvement in university governance: A need for negotiated educational aims?. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, no. 3: 233–46. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2003.9967106
   Google Scholar
• National Nursing Research Unit 2009. Who wants to be a nurse?. Policy+, no. 15
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M. 2010. Student as producer: A pedagogy for the avant-garde; or, how do revolutionary teachers teach? Learning Exchange. http://www.learningexchange.westminster.ac.uk/index.php/lej/article/viewFile/15/13 (accessed November 16, 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., C. Glendinning, and M. Hughes 2008. Beyond modernisation? Social care and the transformation of welfare governance. Journal of Social Policy, 374, 531–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency 2006. Institutional audit: A guide for course representatives. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency 2010. Integrated quality and enhancement review: Student engagement. Information bulletin 2010. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency 2011. Outcomes from institutional audit: 2007–09: Student engagement and support. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 2008. The future of higher education: Teaching and the student experience. , http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/ourwork/consultations/paulramsden_teaching_and_student_experience (accessed August 18, 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 2010. No thinkable alternative. Times Higher Education, , August 5. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=412794 (accessed August 20, 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Standaert, R. 1993. Technical rationality in education management: A survey covering England, France and Germany. European Journal of Education, 28, no. 2: 159–75. doi: 10.2307/1503383
   Google Scholar
• Streeting, W., and G. Wise 2009. Rethinking the values of higher education – Consumption, partnership, community?. London: Quality Assurance Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, W. 2008. Pupil voice to become law. Times Educational Supplement, , July 14
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., and D. Wilding 2009. Rethinking the values of higher education – The student as collaborator and producer? Undergraduate research as a case study. London: Quality Assurance Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, C.H., and A.J. Jaeger 2007. A new context for understanding civic responsibility: Relating culture to action at a research university. Research in Higher Education, 48, no. 8: 993–1019. doi: 10.1007/s11162-007-9058-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. 2010. Student engagement literature review. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2010. Quality assurance: Is the jury still out?. The Law Teacher, 44, no. 1: 4–16. doi: 10.1080/03069400903573495
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A.L., and R.M. Cervero 1997. The song remains the same: The selective tradition of technical rationality in adult education program planning theory. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 16, no. 2: 84–108. doi: 10.1080/0260137970160202
   Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., and L. Leach 2010. Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 167–77. doi: 10.1177/1469787410379680
   Google Scholar