Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities – implications for work motivation

References

• Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 139–58. doi: 10.2307/41165921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, 577–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and P.R. Trowler (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogt, H.J.ter, and R.W. Scapens (2012). Performance management in universities: Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems. European Accounting Review, iFirst Article, 1–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, S. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: The case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 6705–72. doi: 10.1080/03075070601004333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., and R. Laughlin (2009). Performance management systems: A conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20, 4283–95. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B.J., and B.M. Staw (1975). Self-perception on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 4599–605. doi: 10.1037/h0077100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., J. Barry, and H. Clark (2002). Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management. Human Relations, 55, 91051–68. doi: 10.1177/0018726702055009019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, J.G., and S. Arenson (1993). Motivational loss in small task groups: Free riding on a cognitive task. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 119, 157–74.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., and K. Genell (2002). Gone shopping? Universities on their way to the market. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18, 4455–74. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00029-X
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 1105–15. doi: 10.1037/h0030644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management, New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1964). Managing for results, Oxford: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., L. Rhoades, and J. Cameron (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 51026–40. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, L. (1992). Mercury meets Minerva: Business studies and higher education: The Swedish case, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009). Flash Eurobarometer no. 260. Students and higher education reform. Survey among students in higher education institutions, in the EU member states, Croatia, Iceland, Norway and Turkey., March 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_260_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S. (2002). Creativity, government and the arts. De Economist, 150, 4363–76. doi: 10.1023/A:1020128016113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S., and R. Jegen (2001). Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 5589–611. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakala, J. (2009a). Socialization of junior researchers in new academic research environments: Two case studies from Finland. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 5501–16. doi: 10.1080/03075070802597119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakala, J. (2009b). Academic cultures in the Finnish mass research university. Change and continuity. PhD dissertation, University of Tampere
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, M.J. (1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 2/393–109. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karran, T. (2009). Academic freedom: In justification of a universal idea. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 3268–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiikka, J. (2002). Management by results and performance-related pay in employees' motivation. PhD dissertation, University of Lapland
   Google Scholar
• Kivistö, J., J. Tirronen (2012). New elitism in universal higher education: The building process, policy and the idea of Aalto University. In A. Sakari, and D. Hoffman (Eds.), Higher education research in Finland, 69–87.Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kuoppala, K. (2005a). Tulosjohtaminen yliopiston sisäisessä hallinnossa. In H. Aittola, and O.-H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Tulosohjattua autonomiaa, 227–49.Helsinki: Gaudeamus Kirja.
   Google Scholar
• Kuoppala, K. (2005b). Management by results at Finnish universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27, 3345–55. doi: 10.1080/13600800500283692
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit?. ABACUS, 45, 11–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2001). Management by results in higher education, Finland: Publications of the Department for Education and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2003). Goals versus institutions: The development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Management Accounting Research, 14, 4333–59. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2003.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2005). Students as consumers? An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18, 4537–63. doi: 10.1108/09513570510609351
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2006). Institutional and negotiated order perspectives on cost allocations: The case of the Swedish university sector. European Accounting Review, 15, 2219–51. doi: 10.1080/09638180500252144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterloh, M., and B.S. Frey (2009). Are more and better indicators the solution?. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 2225–27. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, L.D. (2002). It's been a pleasure doing business with you: A strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 5/6603–19. doi: 10.1006/cpac.2002.0561
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M., and D. Jary (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2, 2319–38. doi: 10.1177/135050849522013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1992). Performance and accountability in ‘post-industrial society’: The crisis of British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 17, 2123–39. doi: 10.1080/03075079212331382617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffinsøe-Møller, M. (2011). Aims and formats for performance measurement at the Danish universities. Battles over performance regimens and procedures. In J.E. Kristensen, H. Nørreklit, and M. Raffinsøe-Møller (Eds.), University performance management: The silent managerial reform in Danish universities, 49–78.Copenhagen: DJøF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rekilä, E. (2005). Whose university? The impact of the state, of the markets and of self-regulation on the Finnish universities. PhD dissertation, University of Vaasa
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, A. (2003). New public management and Finnish public sector organisations: The case of universities. In A. Amaral, L.V. Meek, and I.M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution?, 55–69.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Sveiby, K-E. (1990). Kunskapsledning, 101 råd till ledare i kunskapsintensiva organisationer, Stockholm: Affärsvärlden Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss, J.E. (2005). A framework for assessing incentives in results-based management. Public Administration Review, 65, 5592–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00486.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakkuri, J., and P. Meklin (2003). The impact of culture on the use of performance measurement information in the university setting. Management Decision, 41, 8751–59. doi: 10.1108/00251740310496260
   Google Scholar
• Van Herpen, M., M. Van Praag, and K. Cools (2005). The effects of performance measurement and compensation on motivation: An empirical study. De Economist, 153, 3303–29. doi: 10.1007/s10645-005-1990-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, M.J. (1980). The effect of incentive and control over outcomes upon intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 2247–54. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1980.9924326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., and R. Boden (2011). Markets, managerialism and measurement: Organisational transformations of universities in UK and Denmark. In J.E. Kristensen, H. Nørreklit, and M. Raffinsøe-Møller (Eds.), University performance management: The silent managerial reform in Danish Universities, 79–99.Copenhagen: DJøF Bublishing.
   Google Scholar