Interdisciplinarity and industry collaboration in doctoral candidature: tensions within and between discourses

References

• Bansel, P. (2011). Becoming academic: A reflection on doctoral candidacy. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 5543–56. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.594592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N.W.H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality & Quantity, 25, 2115–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00145701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell-Damian, L., T. Brown, A. Dearing, J. Font, S. Hagen, J. Metcalfe, and J. Smith (2010). Collaborative doctoral education: University–industry partnerships for enhancing knowledge exchange. Higher Education Policy, 23, 4493–514. doi: 10.1057/hep.2010.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Božic´, S., and R.J. Pohoryles (2009). Why bother with interdisciplinarity in the social and human sciences?. Innovation, 22, 2143–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbeer, J. (1999). Barriers to interdisciplinarity: Disciplinary discourses and student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23, 3381–96. doi: 10.1080/03098269985326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadman, K., and M. Cargill (2007). Providing quality advice on candidates' writing. In D. Carey, and T. Evans (Eds.), Supervising doctorates downunder: Keys to effective supervision in Australia, 182–91.Camberwell: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chappells, H., and E. Shove (2004). Infrastructures, crises and the orchestration of demand. In D. Southerton, B. Van Vliet, and H. Chappells (Eds.), Sustainable consumption: The implications of changing infrastructures of provision, 130–43.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, L. (2007). Developing the intellectual and emotional climate for candidates. In D. Carey, and T. Evans (Eds.), Supervising doctorates downunder: Keys to effective supervision in Australia, 36–44.Camberwell: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R., and S. Marvin (2006). Researching the sustainable city: Three modes of interdisciplinarity. Environment and Planning A, 38, 61009–28. doi: 10.1068/a37317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, S.H., and P.M. Jean (2003). Bridging the disciplines: Interdisciplinary discourse and faculty scholarship. Journal of Higher Education, 74, 2119–49. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2003.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garton, A., and J. Mcfarlane (2007). Editing and proofreading skills. In D. Carey, and T. Evans (Eds.), Supervising doctorates downunder: Keys to effective supervision in Australia, 87–94.Camberwell: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B.M. (2005). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 3337–54. doi: 10.1080/09518390500082483
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., and E. Shove (2000). A sociology of energy, buildings and the environment, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and J. Malfroy (2009). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 179–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., S. Mowbray (2011). The impact of the doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 5513–25. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.594590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, K.M. (2008). Challenging traditional research training culture: Industry-oriented doctoral programs in Australian cooperative research centres. In J. Välimaa, and O-H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education, 179–95.Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., A. Lee, and B. Green (2000). The PhD and the autonmous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 2135–47. doi: 10.1080/713696141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W.E. Bijker, T.P> Hughes, and T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, 225–58.Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 3267–81. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malfroy, J. (2011). The impact of university–industry research on doctoral programs and practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 5571–84. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.594594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., P. Lant, and G. Mellick (2006). Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 3365–79. doi: 10.1080/13562510600680954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., R. Pitt, L. Cox, P. Boreham, G. Mellick, and P. Lant (2011). Evaluating industry-based doctoral research programs: Perspectives and outcomes of Australian cooperative research centre graduates. Studies in Higher Education, : 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., and W. Medd (2004). Sustainable infrastructures by proxy? Intermediation beyond the production–consumption nexus. In D. Southerton, B. Van Vliet, and H. Chappells (Eds.), Sustainable consumption: The implications of changing infrastructures of provision, 81–94.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T.W., and R. Smyth (2010). Research supervision: The research management matrix. Higher Education, 59, 407–22. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9256-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliam, E. (2002). Mentor, manager and mentoree: New academic literacies for research education. In M. Kiley, and G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: Integrating perspectives, Canberra: Centre for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Scholarship, University of Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, K. (2009). For interdisciplinarity and a disciplined, professional sociology. Innovation, 22, 2219–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., and D.S. Pugh (2005). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen-Karlsson, M., and L. Wallgren (2008). The interaction of academic and industrial supervisors in graduate education. Higher Education, 56, 177–93. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9090-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove (2010a). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1273–85. doi: 10.1068/a42282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2010b). Social theory and climate change: Questions often, sometimes and not yet asked. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 2–3277–88. doi: 10.1177/0263276410361498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove (2011). Commentary: On the difference between chalk and cheese – a response to Whitmarsh et al's comments on ‘Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change’. Environment and Planning A, 43, 262–64. doi: 10.1068/a43484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., L. Lutzenhiser, S. Guy, B. Hackett, and H. Wilhite (1998). Energy and social systems. In S. Rayner, and E.L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change, 291–323.Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sofoulis, Z. 1997. What scholar would endorse me? Transference, counter-transference and postgraduate pedagogy. Paper presented at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, October 3
   Google Scholar
• Sofoulis, Z. (2005). Big water, everyday water: A sociotechnical perspective. Continuum, 19, 4445–63. doi: 10.1080/10304310500322685
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2009. Bridging the divide between resource management and everyday life: Smart metering, comfort and cleanliness. PhD thesis, RMIT University
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2011a. Beyond demand management: Co-managing energy and water consumption in Australian households. Policy Studies 32, no. 1: 35–58
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2011b. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for doctoral supervision, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Thune, T. (2009). Doctoral students on the university–industry interface: A review of the literature. Higher Education, 58, 5637–51. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9214-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, B., H. Chappells, and E. Shove (2005). Infrastructures of consumption: Environmental innovation in the utilities industries, London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., S. O'Neill, and I. Lorenzoni (2011). Commentary: Climate change or social change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond disciplines. Environment and Planning A, 43, 258–61. doi: 10.1068/a43359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite, H., E. Shove, L. Lutzenhiser, and W. Kempton (2000). The legacy of twenty years of energy demand management: We know more about individual behaviour but next to nothing about demand. In E. Jochem, J. Sathaya, and D. Bouille (Eds.), Society, behaviour and climate change mitigation, 109–26.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar