365
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The framework of a generic DProf programme – a reflection on its design, the relational dimension for candidates and advisers and the potential for knowledge co-creation

References

  • Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2009). Impact and scholarship: Unlearning and practising to co-create actionable knowledge. Manage. Learn. Management Learning, 40, 4421–30. doi: 10.1177/1350507609336708
  • Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2010). Beyond co-production: Practice-relevant scholarship as a foundation for delivering impact through powerful ideas. Public Money and Management, 30, 4219–26. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2010.492182
  • Atkinson, T., and G. Claxton (2000). The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Bartunek, J.M. (2007). Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 61223–333. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.28165912
  • Berger, P.L., B. Berger, and H. Kellner (1974). The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Boud, D., and C. Costley (2007). From project supervision to advising: New conceptions of the practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 2119–30. doi: 10.1080/14703290701241034
  • Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered – Priorities of the professoriate, : Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Brown, K., and C. Cooke. 2010. Professional doctorate awards in the UK. Lichfield: UK Council for Graduate Education. http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/Resources/UKCGE/Documents/PDF/Professional%20Doctorate%20Awards%20in%20the%20UK%20(2010).pdf (accessed August 3, 2010)
  • Carvalho de Mello, J.M., and H. Etzkowitz (2000). The endless transition: Relations among social, economic and scientific development in a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. In: Paper presented at the Third Triple Helix International ConferenceRio de Janeiro, April 26–29.
  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) (2008). Learning and development, London
  • Costley, C., and P. Armsby (2006). Work-based learning assessed as a field or a mode of study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 121–33. doi: 10.1080/02602930600848267
  • Dingman, M.E. 2004. The effects of executive coaching on job-related attitudes. Doctorate thesis, Regent University, Virginia Beach
  • Doncaster, K., and S. Lester (2002). Capability and its development: Experiences from a work-based doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 191–101. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099395
  • Dreyfus, H.L., P. Rabinow, and M. Foucault (1983). Michel Foucault, beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dunning, D., M. Perie, and A.L. Story (1991). Self-serving prototypes of social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 6957–68. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.957
  • Dutton, J.E., and J.M. Dukerich (2006). Editors' forum: What makes research interesting? The relational foundation of research: An underappreciated dimension of interesting research. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 121 doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785497
  • Evans, T. (1997). Flexible doctoral research: Emerging issues in professional doctorate programs. Studies in Continuing Education, 19, 2174 doi: 10.1080/0158037970190207
  • Gherardi, S. 2009. Knowing and learning in practice-based studies. EBook Library. http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=474409
  • Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gibbons, M. (2000). Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science. Science and Public Policy, 27, 159–63. doi: 10.3152/147154300781782011
  • Grant, B. (2008). Agonistic struggle. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7, 19–27. doi: 10.1177/1474022207084880
  • Grant, B.M. (2010). Improvising together. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 9, 3271–88. doi: 10.1177/1474022210379376
  • Jarvis, J., D. Lane, and A. Fillery-Travis (2006). The case for coaching – Making evidence-based decisions on coaching, : London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
  • Jarzabkowski, P., S. Mohrman, and A. Scherer (2010). Organization studies as applied science: The generation and use of academic knowledge about organizations introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 31, s. 9/101189–1207. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374394
  • Kameen, P. (1995). Studying professionally: Pedagogical relationships at the graduate level. College English, 57, 4448–60. doi: 10.2307/378243
  • Kealey, T. (1996). The economic laws of scientific research, Basingstoke, UK: Houndmills; New York: Macmillan.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lane, D., and S. Corrie (2006). The scientist practitioner, New York: Routledge.
  • Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 3267–81. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049202
  • Lee, A. (2010). New approaches to doctoral supervision: Implications for educational development. Educational Developments, 11, 318–23.
  • Lester, S. (2004). Conceptualising the practitioner doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 5757–70.
  • Macey, W.H., and B. Schneider (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 13–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
  • Maxwell, T. (2003). From first to second generation professional doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 3279 doi: 10.1080/03075070309292
  • Maxwell, T.W., B. Green, and P.J. Shanahan (2001). Doctoral education and professional practice: The next generation?, Armidale, Australia: Kardoorair Press.
  • Roberts, W.R., and I. Bywater (1954). The rhetoric and the poetics of Aristotle, : New York: Modern Library.
  • Ruona, W.E.A., and J.W. Gilley (2009). Practitioners in applied professions: A model applied to human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 4438–53. doi: 10.1177/1523422309344719
  • Rynes, S.L., J.M. Bartunek, and R.L. Daft (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 2340–55. doi: 10.2307/3069460
  • Salter, A. (2000). Committee of Vice-chancellors Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom (CVCP) University of Sussex Science Policy Research and Higher Education Funding Council for England. Talent, not technology: Publicly funded research and innovation in the UK, London: CVCP.
  • Schatzki, T.R., K. Knorr-Cetina, and E.V. Savigny (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory, New York: Routledge.
  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, : New York: Basic Books.
  • Scott, I. (2010). But I know that already: Rhetoric or reality the accreditation of prior experiential learning in the context of work-based learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15, 119–31. doi: 10.1080/13596740903565285
  • Stephenson, J., M. Malloch, and L. Cairns (2006). Managing their own programme: A case study of the first graduates of a new kind of doctorate in professional practice. Studies in Continuing Education, 28, 117–32. doi: 10.1080/01580370500525681
  • Tennant, M. (2004). Doctoring the knowledge worker. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 3431–41. doi: 10.1080/0158037042000265971
  • Trullen, J., and J. Bartunek (2007). What a design approach offers to organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 123–40. doi: 10.1177/0021886306297549
  • Van de Ven, A.H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wasserman, I.C., and K.E. Kram (2009). Enacting the scholar–practitioner role. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, 112–38. doi: 10.1177/0021886308327238
  • Zoë, B. (2009). Theology and the researching professional. Theology, 112, 869333–43.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.