Profiling approaches to teaching in higher education: a cluster-analytic study

References

• Åkerlind, G.S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher – Variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375–90. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000122242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 2151–62. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying, Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and M. Coffey (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87–100. doi: 10.1177/1469787404040463
   Google Scholar
• Gore, P.A.,Jr. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H.E.A. Tinsley, and S.D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling, 297–321.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S.B., and N.J. Salkind (2003). Using SPSS for windows and Macintosh. Analyzing and understanding data (3rd ed), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255–75. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., and L. Gow (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 58–74. doi: 10.2307/2943877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., and K. Kwan (2000). Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–90. doi: 10.1023/A:1026569608656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, C., and A. Saleh (1998). Teaching nine to five: A study of the teaching styles of male and female professors. Paper presented at the Women in Educational Leadership Annual Conference, October 11–12, in Lincoln, Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., K. Trigwell, A. Nevgi, and P. Ashwin (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285–98. doi: 10.1080/03075070600680539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueddeke, G.R. (2003). Professionalizing teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 213–28. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000058082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-centered approach. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, and J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual, 33–64.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.H.F. (2000). The modeling of ‘dissonant’ study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 5–18. doi: 10.1007/BF03173163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.H.F., and M.G. Eley (2006). The approaches to teaching inventory: A critique of its development and applicability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 633–49. doi: 10.1348/000709905X49908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevgi, A., L. Postareff, and S. Lindblom-Ylänne (2004). The effect of discipline on motivational and self-efficacy beliefs and on approaches to teaching of Finnish and English university teachers. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG Higher Education Conference, 18–21 June, in Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., N. Katajavuori, S. Lindblom-Ylanne, and K. Trigwell (2008). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 149–61. doi: 10.1080/03075070701794809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., and S. Lindblom-Ylänne (2008). Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 2109–20. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Ylänne, and A. Nevgi (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M, P. Ramsden, K. Trigwell, and E. Martin (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 37–48. doi: 10.1080/03075070309299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405–419. doi: 10.1348/000709905X43571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelowicz, K., and J.D. Bain (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00138620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, E. (1996). Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty. Research in Higher Education, 37, 659–79. doi: 10.1007/BF01792951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stes, A. (2008). The impact of instructional development in higher education: Effects on teachers and students, Ghent: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stes, A., L. Coertjens, and P. Van Petegem (2010). Instructional development for teachers in higher education: Impact on teaching approach. Higher Education, 60, 2187–204. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9294-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stes, A., S. De Maeyer, and P. Van Petegem (2010). Approaches to teaching in higher education: Validation of a Dutch version of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Learning Environments Research, 13, 159–73. doi: 10.1007/s10984-009-9066-7
   Google Scholar
• Stes, A., D. Gijbels, and P. Van Petegem (2008). Student-focused approaches to teaching in relation to context and teacher characteristics. Higher Education, 55, 3255–67. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9053-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 3275–84. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 409–25. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and P. Ginns (2005). Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 349–60. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284730
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and P. Taylor (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84. doi: 10.1007/BF01383761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and F. Waterhouse (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1003548313194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, E., and M.B. Miles. 1994. Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar