Barriers to women leaders in academia: tales from science and technology

References

• Adamo, S. A. 2013. “Attrition of Women in the Biological Sciences: Workload, Motherhood, and Other Explanations Revisited.” BioScience 63 (1): 43–48. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athena SWAN. 2011. Annual Report. London: Equality Challenge Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Bailyn, L. 2003. “Academic Careers and Gender Equity: Lessons Learned from MIT1.” Gender, Work and Organization 10 (2): 137–53. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, S., A. Powell, B. Bagilhole, and A. Dainty. 2009. “Researching UK Women Professionals in SET: A Critical Review of Current Approaches.” Gender, Science and Technology 2 (3): 361–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., and W. M. Williams. 2011. “Understanding Current Causes of Women's Underrepresentation in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (8): 3157–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clance, P. R., and S. A. Imes. 1978. “The Impostor Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Interventions.” Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice 15: 241–47. doi: 10.1037/h0086006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clance P. R., and M. A. O'Toole. 1987. “Impostor Phenomenon: An Internal Barrier to Empowerment and Achievement.” Women and Therapy 6 (3): 51–64. doi: 10.1300/J015V06N03_05
   Google Scholar
• Darisa, T., V. J. Davidson, K. Korabik, and S. Desmarais. 2010. “Commitment to Graduate Studies and Careers in Science and Engineering: Examining Women's and Men's Experiences.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 2 (1): 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• De Welde, K., and S. Laursen 2011. “The Glass Obstacle Course: Informal and Formal Barriers For Women PhD Students in STEM Fields.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3 (3): 571–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., A. E. Lincoln, and C. Tansey. 2012. “Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science.” Gender and Society 26 (5): 693–717. doi: 10.1177/0891243212451904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. 2007. “‘You Need Tits to Get on Round Here’: Gender and Sexuality in the Entrepreneurial University of the 21st Century.” Ethnography 8 (4): 503–17. doi: 10.1177/1466138107083565
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M. 2013. “No Woman is Like a Man (in Academia): The Masculine Symbolic Order and the Unwanted Female Body.” Organization Studies 34 (9): 1251–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. 2005. “Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity Among Scientists.” Social Studies of Science 35 (1): 131–50. doi: 10.1177/0306312705046630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. 2010. “Women and Men Faculty in Academic Science and Engineering: Social-organizational Indicators and Implications.” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (7): 997–1012. doi: 10.1177/0002764209356234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., C. Fonseca, and J. Bao. 2011. “Work and Family Conflict in Academic Science: Patterns and Predictors Among Women and Men in Research Universities.” Social Studies of Science 41 (5): 715–35. doi: 10.1177/0306312711417730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, S. 2012. “Perspectives on Collegiality Matters.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 38 (2): 108–14. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., M. A. Mason, and K. Frasch. 2011. “Keeping Women in the Science Pipeline.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 638 (1): 141–62. doi: 10.1177/0002716211416925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. 2007. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, J. 2013. Glass Ceiling Remains in Place for Female Academics. Global Gender Index, 2013. Times Higher Education. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/features/global-gender-index-2013/2003517.fullarticle.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. 1995. “Race, Opportunity, and Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial Networks.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (3): 673–703. doi: 10.2307/256742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., M. Kilduff, and W. Tsai. 2005. “Zooming In and Out: Connecting Individuals and Collectivities at the Frontiers of Organizational Network Research.” Organization Science 16 (4): 359–71. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imes, S. A., and P. R. Clance. 1984. “Treatment of the Impostor Phenomenon in High Achieving Women.” In Women Working With Women, edited by C. Brody, 75–88. New York: Snapfinger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jöstl, G., E. Bergsmann, M. Lüftenegger, B. Schober, and C. Spiel. 2012. “When will they Blow my Cover? The Impostor Phenomenon among Austrian Doctoral Students.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 220 (2): 109. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldal, S., J. Rindfleish, and A. Sheridan. 2005. “Deal-making and Rule-breaking: Behind the Facade of Equity in Academia.” Gender and Education 17 (4): 431–47. doi: 10.1080/09540250500145130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and W. Richards. 2003. “Sex Discrimination in UK Academia.” Gender and Work Organisation 10 (2): 213–38. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, J., and P. R. Clance. 1993. “The Imposter Phenomenon: Recent Research Findings Regarding Dynamics, Personality and Family Patterns and their Implications for Treatment.” Psychotherapy 30 (3): 495–501. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.30.3.495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E. 2006. “Gender Differences in Productivity Research Specialization as a Missing Link.” Gender and Society 20 (6): 754–80. doi: 10.1177/0891243206293030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledin, A., L. Bornmann, F. Gannon, and G. Wallon. 2007. “A Persistent Problem: Traditional Gender Roles Hold Back Female Scientists.” EMBO Reports 8 (11): 982–87. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2010. “Professors as Intellectual Leaders: Formation, Identity and Role.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (1): 57–73. doi: 10.1080/03075070903443734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2012. “Whisper it Softly, Professors are Really Academic Developers too.” International Journal for Academic Development 17 (2): 181–83. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2012.662465
   Google Scholar
• Maranto, C. L., and A. E. Griffin. 2011. “The Antecedents of a ‘Chilly Climate’ for Women Faculty in Higher Education.” Human Relations 64 (2): 139–59. doi: 10.1177/0018726710377932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. A. 2008. “Do Babies Matter in Science?” Chronicle of Higher Education 17.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, and J. Handelsman. 2012. “Science Faculty's Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (41): 16474–79. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemi, S., S. Mortazavi, and S. Borjalilou. 2012. “Investigating Factors Influencing Women's Inclination in Adopting Managerial Positions in Iranian Higher Education.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 4 (7): 722–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H. L. 2013. “Barriers to and Facilitators of Female Deans’ Career Advancement in Higher Education: An Exploratory Study in Vietnam.” Higher Education 66 (1): 123–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pell, A. N. 1996. “Fixing the Leaky Pipeline: Women Scientists in Academia.” Journal of Animal Science 74 (11): 2843–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., B. Bagilhole, and A. Dainty. 2009. “How Women Engineers do and undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality.” Gender, Work and Organisation 16 (4): 411–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. N. 2000. “The Glass Ceiling: Explaining the Good and Bad News.” Women in Management: Current Research Issues 2: 236–49.
   Google Scholar
• Priola, V. 2007. “Being Female Doing Gender. Narratives of Women in Education Management.” Gender and Education 19 (1): 21–40. doi: 10.1080/09540250601087728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probert, B. 2005. “‘I Just Couldn't Fit in’: Gender and Unequal Outcomes in Academic Careers.” Gender, Work and Organisation 21 (1): 50–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., M. Fuller, L. McEwen, and H. Roberts. 2010. “Managing Leadership in the UK University: A Case for Researching the Missing Professoriate? Studies in Higher Education 35 (6): 617–31. doi: 10.1080/03075070903243100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoton, L. A. 2009. “Distancing as a Gendered Barrier: Understanding Women Scientists’ Gender Practices.” Gender and Society 25 (6): 696–716. doi: 10.1177/0891243211422717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, S. V., and E.O. Lane. 2002. “Key Barriers for Academic Institutions Seeking to Retain Female Scientists and Engineers: Family-unfriendly Policies, Low Numbers, Stereotypes and Harassment.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 8 (2): 161–89.
   Google Scholar
• Schostak, J. F. 2006. Interviewing and Representation in Qualitative Research Projects. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., L. M. Cortina, J. Malley, and A. J. Stewart. 2006. “The Climate for Women in Academic Science: The Good, the Bad, and the Changeable.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (1): 47–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., P. Flowers, and M. Larkin. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tapping all our Talents. 2012. Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: A Strategy for Scotland. Edinburgh: Royal Society of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. 2009. “The Impostor Phenomenon: A Look at the Outside, the Inside, and the Other Side Through Scholarly Personal Narrative.” Doctoral diss., Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, M. E., and E. B. Kimmel. 1985. “The Imposter Phenomenon: Feeling Phony.” Academic Psychology Bulletin 7 (2): 213–26.
   Google Scholar
• UCU. 2013. The Position of Women and BME Staff in Professorial Roles in UK HEIs. London: UCU.
   Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2012. “Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs.” Organization 19 (4): 507–24. doi: 10.1177/1350508411414293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., Y. Benschop, and W. Jansen. 2010. “Transparency in Academic Recruitment: A Problematic Tool for Gender Equality?.” Organization Studies 31 (11): 1459–83. doi: 10.1177/0170840610380812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerås, C., and C. Wold. 1997. “Nepotism and Sexism in Peer Review.” Nature 387 (6631): 341–43.
   Google Scholar
• West, J. D., J. Jacquet, M. M. King, S. J. Correll, and C. T. Bergstrom. 2012. “The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.1759.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. 2003. “Women in Leadership in Higher Education in Australia.” Tertiary Education and Management 9 (1): 45–60. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2003.9967092
   Google Scholar
• Willig C. 2008. Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfinger, N., M. A. Mason, and M. Goulden. 2008. “Problems in the Pipeline.” Gender, Marriage and Fertility in the Ivory Tower 79 (4): 388–405.
   Google Scholar
• Zalevski, A., R. Tobbell, and J. Butcher. 2009. Female Attrition, Retention and Barriers to Careers in SET Academic Research. UKRC Report. http://www.theukrc.org/files/useruploads/files/resources/female_attrition,_retention_and_barriers_to_careers_report_08_12_09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zeldin, A. L., S. L. Britner, and F. Pajares. 2008. “A Comparative Study of the Self Efficacy Beliefs of Successful Men and Women in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Careers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (9): 1036–58. doi: 10.1002/tea.20195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeldin, A. L., and F. Pajares. 2000. “Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers.” American Educational Research Journal 37 (1): 215–46. doi: 10.3102/00028312037001215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar