Change in university teachers' elearning beliefs and practices: a longitudinal study

References

• Asensio, M., J. Whatley, and C. Jones. 2001. “Taking over Someone Else's Design: Implications for the Tutor's Role in Networked Learning.” Association for Learning Technology Journal 9 (3): 65–74. doi: 10.1080/0968776010090307
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., J. D. Bain, and J. Packer. 1999. “Researching University Teaching in Australia: Themes and Issues in Academics’ Reflections.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (2): 237–57. doi: 10.1080/03075079912331379918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2006. “The Contribution of Computer Software to Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data and Analyses.” Research in the Schools 13 (1): 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Vol. 9. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, J. A., and F. Marton. 2004. The University of Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. 2000. Introduction to Research Methods. Sydney: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. 1984. Teachers’ Classroom Decision-Making. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. 1991. “Representations of Teachers’ Knowledge”. In Teaching Knowledge and Intelligent Tutoring, edited by P. Goodyear, 269–78. Norwood: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. 1996. “Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by David C. Berliner and Robert C. Calfee, 709–25. New York: Macmillan/American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Caudle, L. A., and M. J. Moran. 2012. “Changes in Understandings of Three Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice Across Time: Moving from Teacher Preparation to In-service Teaching.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 33 (1): 38–53. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2011.650784
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, F. E., M. D. Fewell, and W. A. Sugar. 2009. “Researcher and Researched.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education 10 (2): 165–76.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., M. Hanley, and D. Hounsell. 1979. “Identifying Distinctive Approaches to Studying.” Higher Education 8 (4): 365–80. doi: 10.1007/BF01680525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., and P. Walker. 2000. “Strategic Alertness and Expanded Awareness Within Sophisticated Conceptions of Teaching.” Instructional Science 28 (5): 335–61. doi: 10.1023/A:1026579005505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, C. 2009. “Conceptions of, and Approaches to, Teaching Online: A Study of Lecturers Teaching Postgraduate Distance Courses.” Higher Education 57 (3): 299–314. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9145-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, C. 2010. “What Do University Teachers Think eLearning Is Good for in Their Teaching?” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 61–78. doi: 10.1080/03075070902874632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. 2005. “Educational Design and Networked Learning: Patterns, Pattern Languages and Design Practice.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21 (1): 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., and L. Markauskaite. 2009. “Teachers’ Design Knowledge, Epistemic Fluency and Reflections on Students’ Experiences.” Paper read at 32nd HERDSA (Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia) conference, Darwin, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 1986. “Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change.” Educational Researcher 15 (5): 5–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015005005
   Google Scholar
• Holdener, J. M. 2010. “Instructional Design: Seminary Faculty Teaching Experience and Spiritual Formation in an Online Environment.” Capella University, ProQuest dissertations and theses.
   Google Scholar
• JISC. 2007. “Student Expectations Study.” Key findings from Online Research and Discussion Evenings held in June 2007 for the Joint Information Systems Committee. Accessed October 19, 2012. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/studentexpectations
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., S. Adams, and M. Cummins. 2012. The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., R. Smith, H. Willis, A. Levine, and K. Haywood. 2011. “The Horizon Report.” http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/HR2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., F. Dochy, K. Struyven, and E. Cascallar. 2011. “The Direct and Indirect Effect of Motivation for Learning on Students’ Approaches to Learning Through the Perceptions of Workload and Task Complexity.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (2): 135–50. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.501329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lameras, P., P. Levy, I. Paraskakis, and S. Webber. 2012. “Blended University Teaching Using Virtual Learning Environments: Conceptions and Approaches.” Instructional Science 40 (1): 141–57. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9170-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D., and D. Ljubojevic. 2011. “Evaluating Learning Designs Through the Formal Representation of Pedagogical Patterns.” In Investigations of E-learning Patterns: Context Factors, Problems and Solutions, edited by C. Kohls and J. Wedekind, 86–105. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Mälkki, K., and S. Lindblom-Ylänne. 2012. “From Reflection to Action? Barriers and Bridges Between Higher Education Teachers’ Thoughts and Actions.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (1): 33–50. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.492500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning – I: Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1): 4–11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., C. Weston, C. Beauchamp, C. Wiseman, and J. Beauchamp. 1999. “Building a Metacognitive Model of Reflection.” Higher Education 37 (2): 105–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1003548425626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., and M. Koehler. 2006. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” The Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumannn, W. L. 2003. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–32. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., N. Katajavuori, S. Lindblom-Ylänne, and K. Trigwell. 2008. “Consonance and Dissonance in Descriptions of Teaching of University Teachers.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (1): 49–61. doi: 10.1080/03075070701794809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Ylänne, and A. Nevgi. 2007. “The Effect of Pedagogical Training on Teaching in Higher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (5): 557–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. 1998. “Toward a Theory of Teaching-in-Context.” Issues in Education 4 (1): 1–94. doi: 10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K. M. 2013. “Does a University Teacher Need to Change E-learning Beliefs and Practices When Using a Social Networking Site? A Longitudinal Case Study.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44 (4): 571–80. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., and C. K. Looi. 2012. “Linking Teacher Beliefs, Practices and Student Inquiry-Based Learning in a CSCL Environment: A Tale of Two Teachers.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 7 (1): 129–59. doi: 10.1007/s11412-011-9133-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, S. J., K. Shephard, and I. Harris. 2011. “Conceptions of E-learning and Professional Development for E-learning Held by Tertiary Educators in New Zealand.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (1): 145–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00997.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stes, Ann, Sven De Maeyer, David Gijbels, and Peter Van Petegem. 2013. “Effects of Teachers’ Instructional Development on Students’ Study Approaches in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (1): 2–19. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.562976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tearle, P., P. Dillon, and N. Davis. 1999. “Use of Information Technology by English University Teachers: Developments and Trends at the Time of the National Inquiry into Higher Education.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 23 (1): 5–15. doi: 10.1080/0309877990230101
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, H. H. 1997. “Stability and Change in Student Teachers’ Beliefs.” European Journal of Teacher Education 20 (3): 209–12. doi: 10.1080/0261976970200301
   Google Scholar
• Torrisi-Steele, G., and G. Davis. 2000. “A Website for My Subject: The Experiences of Some Academics’ Engagement with Educational Designers in a Team Based Approach to Developing Online Learning Materials.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 16 (3): 283–301.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight ‘Big-Tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–51. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K. 2006. “Phenomenography: An Approach to Research into Geography Education.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 30 (2): 367–72. doi: 10.1080/03098260600717489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 1997. “Towards an Understanding of Individual Acts of Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education Research and Development 16 (2): 241–52. doi: 10.1080/0729436970160210
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar